Large-Scale Jet Noise Testing, Reduction and Methods Validation "EXEJET": 5. Analysis of jet-airfoil interaction noise by microphone array techniques

With the constant increase of the size of modern engines to get higher and higher bypassratios, the issue of engine integration is a still more important industrial challenge, especially at take-off and landing. This paper is focused on the identification of jet noise sources and jet-airfoil interaction sources by using microphone array data. The measurements were carried-out in the anechoic, opened test section wind tunnel of Onera, Cepra19. The microphone array technique relies on the Lighthill’s and Ffowcs-Williams & Hawkings’ acoustic analogy equation. The output is the cross-spectrum of the source term of the analogy, defined as the optimal solution to a regularized minimal error equation using the measured microphone cross-spectra as reference. In spite of the heavy computational costs of this technique, a large test matrix could be analyzed. The analysis of isolated jet noise data in subsonic regime shows the contribution of the conventional mixing noise source in the low frequency range, as expected, and of uniformly distributed, decorrelated noise sources in the jet flow at higher frequencies. In underexpanded supersonic regime, a shock-associated noise source is clearly identified, too. An additional contribution is detected in the vicinity of the nozzle exit both in supersonic and subsonic regimes. In presence of an airfoil, the distribution of the noise sources is deeply modified. In particular, a strong noise source is localized on the flap. For high Strouhal numbers, higher than about 2 (based on the jet mixing velocity and diameter), a significant contribution from the jet flow, particularly in the shear-layer near the flap, is observed, too. Indications of acoustic reflection effects on the airfoil are also discerned.

[1]  N. Sandham,et al.  Sound radiation from exponentially growing and decaying surface waves , 2006 .

[2]  Tim Colonius,et al.  Axisymmetric superdirectivity in subsonic jets , 2011, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[3]  Keith Holland,et al.  MEASURING THE RELATIVE STRENGTHS OF A SET OF PARTIALLY COHERENT ACOUSTIC SOURCES , 1997 .

[4]  Stefan Funke,et al.  Noise Source Analysis of an Aeroengine with a new Inverse Method SODIX , 2008 .

[5]  Joel Delville,et al.  Pressure velocity coupling in a subsonic round jet , 2000 .

[6]  Russell H. Thomas,et al.  Flaperon Modification Effect on Jet-Flap Interaction Noise Reduction for Chevron Nozzles , 2007 .

[7]  Tim Colonius,et al.  Instability waves in a subsonic round jet detected using a near-field phased microphone array , 2006, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[8]  Takao Suzuki A review of diagnostic studies on jet-noise sources and generation mechanisms of subsonically convecting jets , 2010 .

[9]  Renaud Davy,et al.  Beamforming-Based Noise Level Measurements in Hard-Wall Closed-Section Wind Tunnels , 2012 .

[10]  Takao Suzuki L1 generalized inverse beam-forming algorithm resolving coherent/incoherent, distributed and multipole sources , 2011 .

[11]  R. Camussi,et al.  Wavelet analysis of near-field pressure fluctuations generated by a subsonic jet , 2012, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[12]  R. Amiet Refraction of sound by a shear layer , 1977 .

[13]  Charles E. Tinney,et al.  A time-resolved estimate of the turbulence and sound source mechanisms in a subsonic jet flow , 2007 .

[14]  V. Fleury,et al.  Optimization of Microphone Array Wall Mountings in Closed-Section Wind Tunnels , 2012 .

[15]  G. Elias Experimental techniques for source location , 1997 .

[16]  J. Huber,et al.  Large-scale Jet Noise Testing, Reduction and Methods Validation "EXEJET" : 4 - Flows characterization with PIV in the CEPRA19 anechoic wind tunnel of Onera , 2014 .

[17]  J. Laufer,et al.  Noise generation by a low-Mach-number jet , 1983, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[18]  Thomas F. Brooks,et al.  Extension of DAMAS Phased Array Processing for Spatial Coherence Determination (DAMAS-C) , 2006 .

[19]  M. Lighthill On sound generated aerodynamically I. General theory , 1952, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[20]  Guillaume Bodard,et al.  Large-Scale Jet Noise Testing, Reduction and Methods Validation "EXEJET": 2. Optimisation of chevron design aimed at jet noise reduction of future turbofans , 2014 .

[21]  Renaud Davy,et al.  Determination of acoustic directivity from microphone array measurements using correlated monopoles , 2008 .

[22]  R.W. Schafer,et al.  Constrained iterative restoration algorithms , 1981, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[23]  Anurag Agarwal,et al.  Jittering wave-packet models for subsonic jet noise , 2011 .

[24]  Takao Suzuki,et al.  Coherent noise sources of a subsonic round jet investigated using hydrodynamic and acoustic phased-microphone arrays , 2013, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[25]  P. Maher,et al.  Handbook of Matrices , 1999, The Mathematical Gazette.

[26]  Renaud Davy,et al.  Characterization of Installation Effects for HBPR Engine, Part 4: Assessment of Jet Acoustics , 2009 .

[27]  P. Hansen Rank-Deficient and Discrete Ill-Posed Problems: Numerical Aspects of Linear Inversion , 1987 .

[28]  Cyril Bonnaud,et al.  Large-Scale Jet Noise Testing, Reduction and Methods Validation "EXEJET": 1. Project Overview and Focus on Installation , 2014 .

[29]  D. G. Crighton,et al.  Shear-layer pressure fluctuations and superdirective acoustic sources , 1990, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[30]  Guillaume Bodard,et al.  Large-Scale Jet Noise Testing, Reduction and Methods Validation 'EXEJET': 3. Hybrid RANS-CAA methods for noise prediction of dual stream jets , 2014 .

[31]  Kevin W. Kinzie,et al.  Turbulence Measurements of Separate-Flow Nozzles with Pylon Interaction Using Particle Image Velocimetry , 2007 .