Induced Labor in Sweden, 1999-2012: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND Previous studies show contradictory results about the impact of induced labor on the cesarean delivery rate and few studies have investigated the risk of vacuum extraction subsequent to induced labor. The aims of the present study were to describe the rate of induced labor in Sweden from 1999 to 2012, and to assess the risk of unplanned cesarean delivery and vacuum extraction after induced labor in relation to medical complications and length of gestation. METHODS A register-based cohort study was conducted, including 1,078,536 women with spontaneous or induced onset of labor who gave birth by noninstrumental vaginal delivery, unplanned cesarean delivery, or vacuum extraction in gestational week 37 + 0 to 41 + 6. Logistic regression was used to study the association between induced labor and instrumental delivery. RESULTS The rate of induced labor increased from 7.7 to 12.9 percent among primiparous and from 7.5 to 11.8 percent among multiparous women. Induced labor was associated with 2-3 times greater risk of unplanned cesarean delivery among all women, except multiparas in gestational week 37-38, and with a 20-50 percent higher risk of vacuum extraction after the adjustment for confounding factors. Among women without a recognized medical complication, induced labor was associated with a threefold increased risk of cesarean delivery in gestational week 39-41 and a 40 percent increase in gestational week 37-38 compared with women with spontaneous onset of labor. CONCLUSIONS The proportion of induced labors increased substantially during the 14-year study period and was associated with an increased risk of both cesarean delivery and vacuum extraction, even in women without a documented medical complication. The increased risk of instrumental delivery should be taken into account when counseling about the risks and benefits of induced labor.

[1]  D. Savitz,et al.  The effect of labour induction on the risk of caesarean delivery: using propensity scores to control confounding by indication , 2016, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[2]  M. McCarroll,et al.  Induction of labor in women with a history of fast labor* , 2016, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[3]  S. Ounpraseuth,et al.  Maternal and perinatal outcomes of indicated inductions of labor , 2015, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[4]  U. Reddy,et al.  Neonatal outcomes in early term birth. , 2014, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  J. Bailit,et al.  Maternal and neonatal outcomes in electively induced low-risk term pregnancies. , 2014, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[6]  E. Rogozińska,et al.  Use of labour induction and risk of cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2014, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[7]  S. Ross,et al.  Does induction of labour increase the risk of caesarean section? A systematic review and meta‐analysis of trials in women with intact membranes , 2014, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[8]  S. Cnattingius,et al.  Maternal Overweight and Obesity and Risks of Severe Birth-Asphyxia-Related Complications in Term Infants: A Population-Based Cohort Study in Sweden , 2014, PLoS medicine.

[9]  U. Högberg,et al.  Vacuum assisted birth and risk for cerebral complications in term newborn infants: a population-based cohort study , 2014, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[10]  U. Waldenström,et al.  Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes Related to Advanced Maternal Age Compared With Smoking and Being Overweight , 2014, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  K. Singhal,et al.  Adverse neonatal outcomes associated with early-term birth. , 2013, JAMA pediatrics.

[12]  S. Cnattingius,et al.  Reason for the increasing use of vacuum extraction in Sweden: a population‐based study , 2013, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[13]  M. Redshaw,et al.  Women's experience of induction of labor: a mixed methods study , 2013, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[14]  P. Hohlfeld,et al.  Adverse obstetrical and neonatal outcomes in elective and medically indicated inductions of labor at term , 2013, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[15]  C. Cho,et al.  Cesarean section and development of the immune system in the offspring. , 2013, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[16]  S. Cnattingius,et al.  Elective induction of labor and the risk of cesarean section in low‐risk parous women: a cohort study , 2013, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[17]  C. Ananth,et al.  Induction of labor in the United States: a critical appraisal of appropriateness and reducibility. , 2012, Seminars in perinatology.

[18]  B. O'brien,et al.  Rates of interventions in labor and birth across Canada: findings of the Canadian Maternity Experiences Survey. , 2012, Birth.

[19]  U. Reddy,et al.  Induction of labor in a contemporary obstetric cohort. , 2012, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[20]  I. Ford,et al.  Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[21]  E. Sheiner,et al.  Risk factors for neonatal brachial plexus paralysis , 2012, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[22]  A. Caughey,et al.  Impending macrosomia: will induction of labour modify the risk of caesarean delivery? , 2012, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[23]  J. Dodd,et al.  Maternal and neonatal outcomes following induction of labor: a cohort study , 2012, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[24]  M. Ezzati,et al.  Major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2011, The Lancet.

[25]  K. Salvesen,et al.  Induction of labor and cerebral palsy: a population‐based study in Norway , 2011, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[26]  E. Nilsson,et al.  Increasing incidence of anal sphincter tears among primiparas in Sweden: A population‐based register study , 2008, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[27]  J. Nelson,et al.  Induction of Labor in the Absence of Standard Medical Indications: Incidence and Correlates , 2007, Medical care.

[28]  C. Newburn-Cook,et al.  Is Older Maternal Age a Risk Factor for Preterm Birth and Fetal Growth Restriction? A SystematicReview , 2005, Health care for women international.

[29]  A. Caughey,et al.  Neonatal complications of term pregnancy: rates by gestational age increase in a continuous, not threshold, fashion. , 2005, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[30]  B. Jacobsson,et al.  Advanced Maternal Age and Adverse Perinatal Outcome , 2004, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[31]  I. Hildingsson,et al.  A negative birth experience: prevalence and risk factors in a national sample. , 2004, Birth.

[32]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Rising rates of labor induction: present concerns and future strategies. , 2002, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[33]  M. Boulvain,et al.  Risks of induction of labour in uncomplicated term pregnancies. , 2001, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology.

[34]  K. Costeloe,et al.  Prolonged pregnancy: evaluating gestation‐specific risks of fetal and infant mortality , 1998, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.