Single photon transduction in Limulus photoreceptors and the Borsellino-Fuortes model

The time-dependent probabilities for the output of the second stage of the Borsellino and Fuortes model for explaining the random kinetics of single photon responses (quantum bumps) observed in Limulus photoreceptors are derived. The expressions differ from those of Borsellino and Fuortes, who incorporated an incorrect assumption into their mathematical treatment. The expressions for the second stage are complex and suggest that formulating exact mathematical predictions from the model is difficult. Therefore, the model was tested by computer simulation of quantum bump kinetics. When gain and time scale were distributed equally among the ten stages, simulated bumps did not resemble quantum bumps recorded from voltage-clamped ventral photoreceptors of Limulus. The distribution of gain and time scale among the stages was varied, as well as the number of stages, but improvement of the match between simulated and real bumps was not achieved. It is concluded that a simple series of gain-producing reactions of the sort modeled by Borsellino and Fuortes is unlikely to underlie the generation of quantum bumps. Alternate possibilities are discussed.

[1]  M. Fuortes,et al.  Visual responses in Limulus. , 1965, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[2]  R. Srebro,et al.  Calcium and the control of discrete wave latency in the ventral photoreceptor of Limulus. , 1976, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  J. Howard,et al.  Response of an insect photoreceptor: a simple log-normal model , 1981, Nature.

[4]  M. Montal Rhodopsin in model membranes. , 1979, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[5]  M. Fuortes,et al.  Interpretation of responses of visual cells of limulus , 1968 .

[6]  Maxwell Rosenlicht Differential extension fields of exponential type. , 1975 .

[7]  F. Wong Nature of light-induced conductance changes in ventral photoreceptors of Limulus , 1978, Nature.

[8]  R. Payne Chemical modifications to transduction in an insect eye , 1981 .

[9]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  Changes in time scale and sensitivity in the ommatidia of Limulus , 1964, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  Changes in time scale and sensitivity in turtle photoreceptors , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  J. Dawes,et al.  In vitro Physiology of Frog Photoreceptor Membranes , 1973 .

[12]  R. Srebro,et al.  The thermal origin of spontaneous activity in the Limulus photoreceptor , 1972, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  S. Yeandle,et al.  Light-Evoked and Spontaneous Discrete Waves in the Ventral Nerve Photoreceptor of Limulus , 1973, The Journal of general physiology.

[14]  J. Lisman Effects of removing extracellular Ca2+ on excitation and adaptation in Limulus ventral photoreceptors. , 1976, Biophysical journal.

[15]  M. Fuortes,et al.  Probability of Occurrence of Discrete Potential Waves in the Eye of Limulus , 1964, The Journal of general physiology.

[16]  Joel E. Brown,et al.  Two Light-Induced Processes in the Photoreceptor Cells of Limulus Ventral Eye , 1971, The Journal of general physiology.

[17]  B W Knight,et al.  Dispersion of latencies in photoreceptors of Limulus and the adapting- bump model , 1980, The Journal of general physiology.