Validation of northern latitude Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer stare ozone profiles with ARC-IONS sondes during ARCTAS: sensitivity, bias and error analysis

Abstract. We compare Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer (TES) versions 3 and 4, V003 and V004, respectively, nadir-stare ozone profiles with ozonesonde profiles from the Arctic Intensive Ozonesonde Network Study (ARCIONS, http://croc.gsfc.nasa.gov/arcions/ during the Arctic Research on the Composition of the Troposphere from Aircraft and Satellites (ARCTAS) field mission. The ozonesonde data are from launches timed to match Aura's overpass, where 11 coincidences spanned 44° N to 71° N from April to July 2008. Using the TES "stare" observation mode, 32 observations are taken over each coincidental ozonesonde launch. By effectively sampling the same air mass 32 times, comparisons are made between the empirically-calculated random errors to the expected random errors from measurement noise, temperature and interfering species, such as water. This study represents the first validation of high latitude (>70°) TES ozone. We find that the calculated errors are consistent with the actual errors with a similar vertical distribution that varies between 5% and 20% for V003 and V004 TES data. In general, TES ozone profiles are positively biased (by less than 15%) from the surface to the upper-troposphere (~1000 to 100 hPa) and negatively biased (by less than 20%) from the upper-troposphere to the lower-stratosphere (100 to 30 hPa) when compared to the ozonesonde data. Lastly, for V003 and V004 TES data between 44° N and 71° N there is variability in the mean biases (from −14 to +15%), mean theoretical errors (from 6 to 13%), and mean random errors (from 9 to 19%).

[1]  Glenn E. Shaw,et al.  The Arctic Research of the Composition of the Troposphere from Aircraft and Satellites (ARCTAS) mission: design, execution, and first results , 2010 .

[2]  Xiong Liu,et al.  Ozone profile retrievals from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument , 2009 .

[3]  Cathy Clerbaux,et al.  Measurements of total and tropospheric ozone from IASI: comparison with correlative satellite, ground-based and ozonesonde observations , 2009 .

[4]  Glenn E. Shaw,et al.  The ARCTAS aircraft mission: design and execution , 2009 .

[5]  J. Worden,et al.  Tropospheric ozone surface depletion (spring) and pollution (summer) in 2008 from the ARCTAS Intensive Ozonesonde Network Study (ARC-IONS) soundings , 2008 .

[6]  A. Thompson,et al.  Tropospheric ozone sources and wave activity over Mexico City and Houston during MILAGRO/Intercontinental Transport Experiment (INTEX-B) Ozonesonde Network Study, 2006 (IONS-06) , 2008 .

[7]  E. Browell,et al.  Validation of Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer ozone profiles with aircraft observations during the Intercontinental Chemical Transport Experiment–B , 2008 .

[8]  K. Bowman,et al.  Implementation of cloud retrievals for TES atmospheric retrievals: 2. Characterization of cloud top pressure and effective optical depth retrievals , 2008 .

[9]  K. Bowman,et al.  Comparison of Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer nadir water vapor retrievals with in situ measurements , 2008 .

[10]  Reinhard Beer,et al.  First satellite observations of lower tropospheric ammonia and methanol , 2008 .

[11]  A. Thompson,et al.  Atmospheric comparison of electrochemical cell ozonesondes from different manufacturers, and with different cathode solution strengths: The Balloon Experiment on Standards for Ozonesondes , 2008 .

[12]  Gary A. Morris,et al.  A Trajectory-based Estimate of the Tropospheric Ozone Column Using the Residual Method , 2007 .

[13]  A. Thompson,et al.  Assessment of the performance of ECC‐ozonesondes under quasi‐flight conditions in the environmental simulation chamber: Insights from the Juelich Ozone Sonde Intercomparison Experiment (JOSIE) , 2007 .

[14]  Reinhard Beer,et al.  Comparisons of Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer (TES) ozone profiles to ozonesondes: Methods and initial results , 2007 .

[15]  Kevin Bowman,et al.  Importance of rain evaporation and continental convection in the tropical water cycle , 2007, Nature.

[16]  H. Worden,et al.  Validation of Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer (TES) nadir ozone profiles , 2008 .

[17]  K. Bowman,et al.  Implementation of cloud retrievals for Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer (TES) atmospheric retrievals: part 1. Description and characterization of errors on trace gas retrievals , 2006 .

[18]  Reinhard Beer,et al.  Overview of the EOS aura mission , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[19]  Reinhard Beer,et al.  Tropospheric emission spectrometer: retrieval method and error analysis , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[20]  Reinhard Beer,et al.  TES on the aura mission: scientific objectives, measurements, and analysis overview , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[21]  Reinhard Beer,et al.  TES atmospheric profile retrieval characterization: an orbit of simulated observations , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[22]  Xiong Liu,et al.  First Directly Retrieved Global Distribution of Tropospheric Column Ozone from GOME: Comparison with the GEOS-CHEM Model , 2006 .

[23]  Cathy Clerbaux,et al.  Retrieval and characterization of ozone vertical profiles from a thermal infrared nadir sounder , 2005 .

[24]  Xiong Liu,et al.  Ozone profile and tropospheric ozone retrievals from the Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment: Algorithm description and validation , 2005 .

[25]  Shepard A. Clough,et al.  Predicted errors of tropospheric emission spectrometer nadir retrievals from spectral window selection , 2004 .

[26]  Rolando R. Garcia,et al.  Seasonal variation of methane, water vapor, and nitrogen oxides near the tropopause: Satellite observations and model simulations , 2004 .

[27]  Pawan K. Bhartia,et al.  Upper tropospheric ozone derived from the cloud slicing technique: Implications for large‐scale convection , 2003 .

[28]  Xiong Liu,et al.  Tropical tropospheric ozone derived using Clear-Cloudy Pairs (CCP) of TOMS measurements , 2003 .

[29]  Shepard A. Clough,et al.  Capturing time and vertical variability of tropospheric ozone: A study using TES nadir retrievals , 2002 .

[30]  Cathy Clerbaux,et al.  First satellite ozone distributions retrieved from nadir high‐resolution infrared spectra , 2002 .

[31]  Lynn C. Sparling,et al.  Scale dependence of tracer microstructure: PDFs, intermittency and the dissipation scale , 2001 .

[32]  David M. Rider,et al.  Tropospheric emission spectrometer for the Earth Observing System’s Aura satellite , 2001 .

[33]  Pawan K. Bhartia,et al.  “Cloud slicing”: A new technique to derive upper tropospheric ozone from satellite measurements , 2001 .

[34]  Clive D Rodgers,et al.  Inverse Methods for Atmospheric Sounding: Theory and Practice , 2000 .

[35]  Jack Fishman,et al.  Calculation of daily tropospheric ozone residuals using TOMS and empirically improved SBUV measurements: Application to an ozone pollution episode over the eastern United States , 1999 .

[36]  B. Connor,et al.  Intercomparison of remote sounding instruments , 1999 .

[37]  Philip J. Rasch,et al.  MOZART, a global chemical transport model for ozone and related chemical tracers: 1. Model description , 1998 .

[38]  Anne M. Thompson,et al.  Tropical tropospheric ozone from total ozone mapping spectrometer by a modified residual method , 1998 .

[39]  Pawan K. Bhartia,et al.  Two new methods for deriving tropospheric column ozone from TOMS measurements: Assimilated UARS MLS/HALOE and convective‐cloud differential techniques , 1998 .

[40]  Robert A. Barnes,et al.  Electrochemical concentration cell ozonesonde performance evaluation during STOIC 1989 , 1995 .

[41]  Jack Fishman,et al.  Distribution of tropospheric ozone determined from satellite data , 1990 .

[42]  J. Fishman,et al.  Distribution of total ozone and stratospheric ozone in the tropics: Implications for the distribution of tropospheric ozone , 1987 .