Development of a Heavy-Duty Diesel Modal Emissions and Fuel Consumption Model

There have been significant improvements in recent years in transportation and emissions modeling, in order to better evaluate transportation operational effects and associated vehicle emissions. In particular, instantaneous or modal emissions models have been developed for a variety of light-duty vehicles. To date, most effort has focused primarily on developing these models for light-duty vehicles with less effort devoted to Heavy-Duty Diesel (HDD) vehicles. Although HDD vehicles currently make up only a fraction of the total vehicle population, they are major contributors to the emissions inventory. Furthermore, it is generally believed that transit buses and heavy trucks will offer earlier opportunities for public implementation of automated operations compared to passenger cars. Thus, there is a critical need to have robust modal emissions and fuel consumption models for HDD vehicles. This report describes a HDD truck model that is now part of a larger Comprehensive Modal Emissions Modeling (CMEM) program developed at the University of California, Riverside. Within the CMEM framework, several HDD truck fuel consumption and emission sub-models have been developed, each corresponding to a distinctive vehicle/technology category. The developed models use a parameterized physical approach where the entire emission process is broken down into different components that correspond to physical phenomena associated with vehicle operation and emission production. As part of a parallel research program, UC Riverside has developed a Mobile Emissions Research Laboratory (MERL) that can be attached to a number of heavy duty rigs to measure instantaneous (i.e., modal) emissions and fuel consumption in-situ. Using MERL, a variety of trucks were extensively tested under a wide range of operating conditions. The collected data (along with other HDD truck data sources) were then used to calibrate the HDD models. Particular care was taken to investigate and implement the effects of varying grade and the effects of variable ignition timing. In this report, background material is provide on HDD vehicle fuel consumption and emissions research, followed by a description of the vehicle testing program. The HDD vehicle model development process is then described, along with the model validation process. The model was subsequently integrated with a variety of transportation simulation modeling tools for the purposes of evaluating several automation scenarios. Particular emphasis has been placed on simulating the truck platoon scenario, where aerodynamic drafting effects can provide a significant benefit in terms of fuel and emissions savings. In addition to the modeling, experimentation has been carried out with MERL in real-world tests, examining trucks traveling in tandem with close inter-vehicle spacings. Results of these tests are also described herein.

[1]  Leonidas Ntziachristos,et al.  Real Time Measurements of Diesel Particle Size Distribution with an Electrical Low Pressure Impactor , 1998 .

[2]  J Wayne Miller,et al.  Development and application of a mobile laboratory for measuring emissions from diesel engines. 1. Regulated gaseous emissions. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  David M. Driver,et al.  Progress in Reducing Aerodynamic Drag for Higher Efficiency of Heavy Duty Trucks (Class 7-8) , 1999 .

[4]  M. Zillmer,et al.  MODELING OF NITRIC OXIDE AND SOOT FORMATION IN DIESEL ENGINE COMBUSTION , 1998 .

[5]  Subrata Roy,et al.  External Flow Analysis of a Truck for Drag Reduction , 2000 .

[6]  J F Collins,et al.  Time resolved characterization of diesel particulate emissions. 1. Instruments for particle mass measurements. , 2001, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  Matthew Barth,et al.  Analysis of Modal Emissions From Diverse In-Use Vehicle Fleet , 1997 .

[8]  Matthew Barth,et al.  STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND MODEL VALIDATION OF AUTOMOBILE EMISSIONS , 2000 .

[9]  C Hart,et al.  EPA's Onboard Analysis Shootout: Overview and Results , 2002 .

[10]  Harold Haskew THE EXECUTION OF A COOPERATIVE INDUSTRY-GOVERNMENT EXHAUST EMISSION TEST PROGRAM. , 1994 .

[11]  M. Graboski,et al.  Quantifying the emission benefits of opacity testing and repair of heavy-duty diesel vehicles. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  Nigel N. Clark,et al.  Measurement Delays and Modal Analysis for a Heavy Duty Transportable Emissions Testing Laboratory , 1995 .

[13]  N. Draper,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis. , 1967 .

[14]  Daniel K. Carder,et al.  Measurement of In-Use, On-Board Emissions from Heavy-Duty Diesel Vehicles:Mobile Emissions Measurement System , 2001 .

[15]  T. H. Allegri The Code of Federal Regulations , 1986 .

[16]  Peter Stommel,et al.  Diesel Exhaust Treatment - New Approaches to Ultra Low Emission Diesel Vehicles , 1999 .

[17]  Matthew Barth,et al.  Development of a Comprehensive Modal Emissions Model , 2000 .

[18]  Kazutoshi Mori WORLDWIDE TRENDS IN HEAVY-DUTY DIESEL ENGINE EXHAUST EMISSION LEGISLATION AND COMPLIANCE TECHNOLOGIES , 1997 .

[19]  Matthew Barth,et al.  Development of Comprehensive Modal Emissions Model: Operating Under Hot-Stabilized Conditions , 1997 .

[20]  Foy G. King,et al.  Comparison of the Particle Size Distribution of Heavy-Duty Diesel Exhaust Using a Dilution Tailpipe Sampler and an In-Plume Sampler during On-Road Operation , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[21]  Mohammad Haghgooie,et al.  Particulate Emissions from a Direct-Injection Spark-Ignition (DISI) Engine , 1999 .

[22]  Robert L. McCormick,et al.  Effect of Humidity on Heavy-Duty Transient Emissions from Diesel and Natural Gas Engines at High Altitude , 1997 .

[23]  Richard J. Atkinson,et al.  Neural Network-Based Diesel Engine Emissions Prediction Using In-Cylinder Combustion Pressure , 1999 .

[24]  N. Clark,et al.  Models for Predicting Transient Heavy Duty Vehicle Emissions , 1998 .

[25]  Ahmed Rachid,et al.  Diesel Engine Exhaust Emissions Modelling Using Artificial Neural Networks , 1999 .

[26]  Matthew Barth Mobile Source Emissions New Generation Model: Using A Hybrid Database Prediction Technique , 2002 .

[27]  Nigel N. Clark,et al.  Application of the New City-Suburban Heavy Vehicle Route (CSHVR) to Truck Emissions Characterization , 1999 .

[28]  C. Weaver,et al.  Development of the ‘RAVEM’ Ride-Along Vehicle Emission Measurement System for Gaseous and Particulate Emissions , 2001 .

[29]  Prakash Gajendran,et al.  A predictive tool for emissions from heavy-duty diesel vehicles. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[30]  M. Graboski,et al.  In-Use Emissions from Heavy-Duty Diesel Vehicles , 2000 .

[31]  Rolf Egnell,et al.  Combustion Diagnostics by Means of Multizone Heat Release Analysis and NO Calculation , 1998 .

[32]  Fred Browand,et al.  Aerodynamic Forces on Truck Models, Including Two Trucks in Tandem , 2001 .

[33]  Rolf Egnell A Simple Approach to Studying the Relation between Fuel Rate Heat Release Rate and NO Formation in Diesel Engines , 1999 .

[34]  M. Graboski,et al.  CHASSIS DYNAMOMETER STUDY OF EMISSIONS FROM 21 IN-USE HEAVY-DUTY DIESEL VEHICLES , 1999 .

[35]  P. Taskinen,et al.  Simulation of Combustion, Soot and Nox-emissions in a Large Medium Speed Diesel Engine , 1998 .

[36]  Fred Browand,et al.  Fuel Saving Achieved in the Field Test of Two Tandem Trucks , 2004 .

[37]  D. Foster,et al.  Modeling of Soot Formation During DI Diesel Combustion Using a Multi-Step Phenomenological Model , 1998 .

[38]  Matthew Barth,et al.  Modal Emissions Model for Heavy-Duty Diesel Vehicles , 2004 .

[39]  Robert A. Harley,et al.  A Fuel-Based Inventory for Heavy-Duty Diesel Truck Emissions , 1998 .

[40]  F. Browand,et al.  The Limits of Drag Behavior for Two Bluff Bodies in Tandem , 2004 .

[41]  F. An,et al.  The Use of Fuel by Spark Ignition Engines , 1993 .

[42]  Matthew Barth,et al.  Modal Emissions Modeling: A Physical Approach , 1996 .

[43]  Matthew Barth,et al.  Integrating a Comprehensive Modal Emissions Model into ATMIS Transportation Modeling Frameworks , 2001 .

[44]  Fred Browand,et al.  Quantifying Platoon Fuel Savings: 1999 Field Experiments , 2001 .

[45]  Janet Yanowitz,et al.  Prediction of in-use emissions of heavy-duty diesel vehicles from engine testing. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[46]  A C Lloyd,et al.  Diesel Engines: Environmental Impact and Control , 2001, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[47]  D. Kittelson Engines and nanoparticles: a review , 1998 .

[48]  H. M Oosmu ‹ Ller,et al.  Time Resolved Characterization of Diesel Particulate Emissions. 1. Instruments for Particle Mass Measurements , 2001 .

[49]  J Edward Brown,et al.  On-Road Facility to Measure and Characterize Emissions from Heavy-Duty Diesel Vehicles , 2002, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[50]  Hans Fritz,et al.  Fuel Consumption Reduction in a Platoon: Experimental Results with two Electronically Coupled Trucks at Close Spacing , 2000 .

[51]  Marc Ross,et al.  MODEL OF FUEL ECONOMY WITH APPLICATIONS TO DRIVING CYCLES AND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT , 1993 .