MRI of the lung: state of the art.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lung is technically challenging due to the low proton density and fast signal decay of the lung parenchyma itself. Additional challenges consist of tissue loss, hyperinflation, and hypoxic hypoperfusion, e.g., in emphysema, a so-called "minus-pathology". However, pathological changes resulting in an increase of tissue ("plus-pathology"), such as atelectases, nodules, infiltrates, mucus, or pleural effusion, are easily depicted with high diagnostic accuracy. Although MRI is inferior or at best equal to multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) for the detection of subtle morphological features, MRI now offers an increasing spectrum of functional imaging techniques such as perfusion assessment and measurement of ventilation and respiratory mechanics that are superior to what is possible with MDCT. Without putting patients at risk with ionizing radiation, repeated examinations allow for the evaluation of the course of lung disease and monitoring of the therapeutic response through quantitative imaging, providing a level of functional detail that cannot be obtained by any other single imaging modality. As such, MRI will likely be used for clinical applications beyond morphological imaging for many lung diseases. In this article, we review the technical aspects and protocol suggestions for chest MRI and discuss the role of MRI in the evaluation of nodules and masses, airway disease, respiratory mechanics, ventilation, perfusion and hemodynamics, and pulmonary vasculature.

[1]  M. Puderbach,et al.  MRI of the lung (2/3). Why … when … how? , 2012, Insights into Imaging.

[2]  Grzegorz Bauman,et al.  Pulmonary functional imaging: qualitative comparison of Fourier decomposition MR imaging with SPECT/CT in porcine lung. , 2011, Radiology.

[3]  H. Kauczor,et al.  Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in cystic fibrosis lung disease , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[4]  Wei Chen,et al.  Whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging vs. FDG-PET for the detection of non-small-cell lung cancer. How do they measure up? , 2010, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[5]  H. Sostman,et al.  Gadolinium-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Pulmonary Embolism , 2010, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[6]  G. Beluffi,et al.  MRI of the lung , 2010, La radiologia medica.

[7]  Zhang Lulu,et al.  Early changes of cardiac structure and function in COPD patients with mild hypoxemia. , 2010 .

[8]  H. Kauczor,et al.  Visualization of morphological parenchymal changes in emphysema: comparison of different MRI sequences to 3D-HRCT. , 2010, European journal of radiology.

[9]  W. Auger,et al.  Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. , 2009, Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine.

[10]  M. Langer,et al.  Detection of Pulmonary Nodules With Move-During-Scan Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using a Free-Breathing Turbo Inversion Recovery Magnitude Sequence , 2008, Investigative radiology.

[11]  J. Biederer,et al.  MRI of pulmonary nodules: technique and diagnostic value , 2008, Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society.

[12]  H. Kauczor,et al.  MR for the evaluation of obstructive pulmonary disease. , 2008, Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America.

[13]  M. Obara,et al.  Correlation of lung parenchymal MR signal intensity with pulmonary function tests and quantitative computed tomography (CT) evaluation: A pilot study , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[14]  M Puderbach,et al.  MR imaging of the chest: a practical approach at 1.5T. , 2007, European journal of radiology.

[15]  Y. Ohno,et al.  STIR turbo SE MR imaging vs. coregistered FDG‐PET/CT: Quantitative and qualitative assessment of N‐stage in non‐small‐cell lung cancer patients , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[16]  H. Kauczor,et al.  Assessment of Morphological MRI for Pulmonary Changes in Cystic Fibrosis (CF) Patients: Comparison to Thin-Section CT and Chest X-ray , 2007, Investigative radiology.

[17]  Y. Ohno,et al.  Whole‐body MR imaging vs. FDG‐PET: Comparison of accuracy of M‐stage diagnosis for lung cancer patients , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[18]  E. Michelakis,et al.  MRI: one-stop shop for the comprehensive assessment of pulmonary arterial hypertension? , 2007, Chest.

[19]  Hans-Ulrich Kauczor,et al.  Lung MRI at 1.5 and 3 Tesla: Observer Preference Study and Lesion Contrast Using Five Different Pulse Sequences , 2007, Investigative radiology.

[20]  F. Rybicki,et al.  Time-resolved MR angiography: a primary screening examination of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism and contraindications to administration of iodinated contrast material. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  John P Mugler,et al.  The variability of regional airflow obstruction within the lungs of patients with asthma: assessment with hyperpolarized helium-3 magnetic resonance imaging. , 2007, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[22]  H. Kauczor,et al.  Impact of Oxygen Inhalation on the Pulmonary Circulation: Assessment by Magnetic Resonance (MR)-Perfusion and MR-Flow Measurements , 2007, Investigative radiology.

[23]  Derliz Mereles,et al.  Quantitative 3D pulmonary MR-perfusion in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: correlation with invasive pressure measurements. , 2007, European journal of radiology.

[24]  K. Kerr,et al.  Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. , 2001, Clinics in chest medicine.

[25]  G. Adam,et al.  Detection of small pulmonary nodules in high-field MR at 3 T: evaluation of different pulse sequences using porcine lung explants , 2007, European Radiology.

[26]  A. Peacock,et al.  Controversies, uncertainties and future research on the treatment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. , 2006, Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society.

[27]  Hans-Ulrich Kauczor,et al.  Assessment of Differential Pulmonary Blood Flow Using Perfusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Comparison With Radionuclide Perfusion Scintigraphy , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[28]  W. Luboldt,et al.  Acute pulmonary embolism to the subsegmental level: diagnostic accuracy of three MRI techniques compared with 16-MDCT. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[29]  Hans-Ulrich Kauczor,et al.  Contrast-enhanced 3D MRI of lung perfusion in children with cystic fibrosis—initial results , 2006, European Radiology.

[30]  T. Nagayasu,et al.  NONINVASIVE ASSESSMENT OF PULMONARY EMPHYSEMA USING DYNAMIC CONTRAST-ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING , 2006, Experimental lung research.

[31]  Y. Kim,et al.  Usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of cardiovascular invasion: Evaluation of sliding motion between thoracic mass and adjacent structures on cine MR images , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[32]  H. Kauczor,et al.  Value of high spatial and high temporal resolution magnetic resonance angiography for differentiation between idiopathic and thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: initial results , 2005, European Radiology.

[33]  Tibo Gerriets,et al.  MRI for short-term follow-up of acute pulmonary embolism. Assessment of thrombus appearance and pulmonary perfusion: a feasibility study , 2005, European Radiology.

[34]  H. Kauczor,et al.  Assessment of hemodynamic changes in the systemic and pulmonary arterial circulation in patients with cystic fibrosis using phase-contrast MRI , 2005, European Radiology.

[35]  John P Mugler,et al.  Functional MRI of the lung using hyperpolarized 3‐helium gas , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[36]  H. Kauczor,et al.  Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: pre- and postoperative assessment with breath-hold MR imaging techniques. , 2004, Radiology.

[37]  Y. Ohno,et al.  Metastases in mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: quantitative and qualitative assessment with STIR turbo spin-echo MR imaging. , 2004, Radiology.

[38]  Paolo Prandoni,et al.  Incidence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after pulmonary embolism. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[39]  Hans-Ulrich Kauczor,et al.  Measurement of diaphragmatic length during the breathing cycle by dynamic MRI: comparison between healthy adults and patients with an intrathoracic tumor , 2004, European Radiology.

[40]  Michael Bock,et al.  Regional lung perfusion: assessment with partially parallel three-dimensional MR imaging. , 2004, Radiology.

[41]  T. Gerriets,et al.  Real-time MR with TrueFISP for the detection of acute pulmonary embolism: initial clinical experience , 2004, European Radiology.

[42]  G. Manenti,et al.  MRI lung perfusion 2D dynamic breath-hold technique in patients with severe emphysema. , 2003, In vivo.

[43]  Y. Ohno,et al.  Clinical Oxygen-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Lung , 2003, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[44]  Jürgen Biederer,et al.  Lung morphology: fast MR imaging assessment with a volumetric interpolated breath-hold technique: initial experience with patients. , 2003, Radiology.

[45]  M. Heller,et al.  Sensitivitt der MRT fr alveolre Infiltrate: Experimentelle Untersuchungen , 2002 .

[46]  M Heller,et al.  [Sensitivity of MRI in detecting alveolar Infiltrates: Experimental studies]. , 2002, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[47]  M. Kusumoto,et al.  Multiphase ECG‐triggered 3D contrast‐enhanced MR angiography: Utility for evaluation of hilar and mediastinal invasion of bronchogenic carcinoma , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[48]  K. Esato,et al.  Impaired respiratory mechanics in pulmonary emphysema: Evaluation with dynamic breathing MRI , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[49]  B J McNeil,et al.  CT and MR imaging in staging non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma: report of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group. , 1991, Radiology.