An Incentive Mechanism Design for Socially Aware Crowdsensing Services with Incomplete Information

Traditional crowdsensing platforms rely on sensory information collected from a group of independent users or sensors. Recently, socially aware crowdsensing services have been introduced as the integration of social networks and crowdsensing platforms. For example, in health-related crowdsensing applications, a user benefits from information regarding food, exercise, medicine, and medical treatment collected and shared by his/her socially connected friends and family members. In this article, we first introduce basic concepts of socially aware crowdsensing services and highlight the importance of "social network effects" in the services. Typically adopted in social networks, network effects are used to quantify the influence of an action or preference of one user on other users with social ties. With this focus, we then discuss important aspects of socially aware crowdsensing services with network effects and some technical challenges. We find that game theory is a suitable analytical tool to investigate such crowdsensing services, for which important related work is surveyed. To address existing research gaps, we propose a game model for an incentive mechanism design with incomplete information about social network effects in socially aware crowdsensing. The proposed model is shown to improve the benefits of the crowdsensing service provider as well as those of the users.

[1]  Jean C. Walrand,et al.  Incentive mechanisms for smartphone collaboration in data acquisition and distributed computing , 2012, 2012 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[2]  Man Hon Cheung,et al.  Make a difference: Diversity-driven social mobile crowdsensing , 2017, IEEE INFOCOM 2017 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications.

[3]  Jiming Chen,et al.  An Exchange Market Approach to Mobile Crowdsensing: Pricing, Task Allocation, and Walrasian Equilibrium , 2017, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[4]  Hossam S. Hassanein,et al.  Towards a Practical Crowdsensing System for Road Surface Conditions Monitoring , 2018, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[5]  Michael R. Lyu,et al.  SoRec: social recommendation using probabilistic matrix factorization , 2008, CIKM '08.

[6]  Xu Chen,et al.  Optimal Privacy-Preserving Data Collection: A Prospect Theory Perspective , 2017, GLOBECOM 2017 - 2017 IEEE Global Communications Conference.

[7]  Yanjiao Chen,et al.  Incentivizing crowdsourcing systems with network effects , 2016, IEEE INFOCOM 2016 - The 35th Annual IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[8]  K. Han Posted Pricing for Robust Crowdsensing , 2016 .

[9]  Zhu Han,et al.  Game Theory in Wireless and Communication Networks: Theory, Models, and Applications , 2011 .

[10]  Xu Chen,et al.  Social-Aware Privacy-Preserving Correlated Data Collection , 2018, MobiHoc.

[11]  Fan Ye,et al.  Mobile crowdsensing: current state and future challenges , 2011, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[12]  Xi Fang,et al.  Incentive Mechanisms for Crowdsensing: Crowdsourcing With Smartphones , 2016, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[13]  Tao Zhang,et al.  Need Support, Need Satisfaction, Intrinsic Motivation, and Physical Activity Participation among Middle School Students , 2011 .

[14]  Lin Gao,et al.  Scalable Mobile Crowdsensing via Peer-to-Peer Data Sharing , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.