The CAQDAS Postgraduate Learning Model: an interplay between methodological awareness, analytic adeptness and technological proficiency

This paper presents an empirically-derived CAQDAS Postgraduate Learning Model (CPLM) that illustrates the importance of integrated learning of qualitative methodology and technology for postgraduate students. Developed from analysis of a qualitative data-set of interview transcripts, survey responses and support-session observations constructed from two previous studies, CPLM brings the fields of technology acceptance/adoption and CAQDAS together. Analysis reveals that initial enthusiasm for the potential of software is often tempered by frustrations with actual, independent use. However, despite frustrations being attributed to lack of software functionality, CPLM illustrates that successful use of CAQDAS technology amongst postgraduate students is related to methodological awareness, adeptness in the techniques of analysis and technological proficiency.

[1]  J. Davidson,et al.  The Implications of Qualitative ‐ Research Software for Doctoral Work Considering the Individual and Institutional Context , 2008 .

[2]  M. Schreier,et al.  Issues in Learning About and Teaching Qualitative Research Methods and Methodology in the Social Sciences , 2007 .

[3]  Christina Silver.  QDA Miner (With WordStat and Simstat) , 2015 .

[4]  Michael J White,et al.  Illumination with a Dim Bulb? What Do Social Scientists Learn by Employing Qualitative Data Analysis Software in the Service of Multimethod Designs? , 2012, Sociological methodology.

[5]  Megan Woods,et al.  Advancing Qualitative Research Using Qualitative Data Analysis Software (QDAS)? Reviewing Potential Versus Practice in Published Studies using ATLAS.ti and NVivo, 1994–2013 , 2016 .

[6]  Kristi Jackson,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo , 2007 .

[7]  Lynne Halley Johnston,et al.  Software and Method: Reflections on Teaching and Using QSR NVivo in Doctoral Research , 2006 .

[8]  Nigel Fielding,et al.  New Patterns in the Adoption and Use of Qualitative Software , 2002 .

[9]  T. Paulus,et al.  ‘I have a love–hate relationship with ATLAS.ti’™: integrating qualitative data analysis software into a graduate research methods course , 2017 .

[10]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  An Innovative Training Model for an Organization Embracing Technology , 2002, J. Inf. Technol. Educ..

[11]  Manolis Mavrikis,et al.  Using Qualitative Data Analysis Software to analyse students’ computer‐mediated interactions: the case of MiGen and Transana , 2011 .

[12]  Clare Tagg,et al.  Qualitative research and computing: Methodological issues and practices in using QSR NVivo and NUD*IST , 2002 .

[13]  Dan Kaczynski,et al.  Curriculum Development for Teaching Qualitative Data Analysis Online. , 2004 .

[14]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  The Legacy of the Technology Acceptance Model and a Proposal for a Paradigm Shift , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Mary E. Ryan.  Making visible the coding process : Using qualitative data software in a post-structural study , 2009 .

[16]  J. Maxwell.  Understanding and Validity in Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[17]  Christina Silver,et al.  Learning from the Learners: the role of technology acceptance and adoption theories in understanding researchers’ early experiences with CAQDAS packages , 2013 .

[18]  Geoffrey S. Hubona,et al.  The mediation of external variables in the technology acceptance model , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[19]  Karen Renaud,et al.  Predicting technology acceptance and adoption by the elderly: a qualitative study , 2008, SAICSIT '08.

[20]  Pat Bazeley,et al.  Integrative Analysis Strategies for Mixed Data Sources , 2012 .

[21]  Judith Davidson.  Learning to ‘Read’ NVivo Projects: Implications for Teaching Qualitative Research , 2005 .

[22]  U. Flick,et al.  The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis , 2013 .

[23]  Fred D. Davis.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: System Characteristics, User Perceptions and Behavioral Impacts , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[24]  Nicholas Woolf.  Analytic strategies and analytic tactics , 2014 .

[25]  Christina Silver,et al.  Using Computer Packages in Qualitative Research , 2008 .

[26]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  The role of social awareness in technology acceptance of groupware in virtual learning , 2003 .

[27]  Timothy Paul Cronan,et al.  On the Test-Retest Reliability of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use Scales , 1993 .

[28]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Why Don't Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior , 2000, MIS Q..

[29]  Oscar Odena.  Using software to tell a trustworthy, convincing and useful story , 2013 .

[30]  Diógenes Carvajal,et al.  The Artisan's Tools. Critical Issues when Teaching and Learning CAQDAS , 2002 .

[31]  A. King.  ‘Membership matters’: applying Membership Categorisation Analysis (MCA) to qualitative data using Computer‐Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis (CAQDAS) Software , 2010 .

[32]  Judith Davidson,et al.  Qualitative Research Design for Software Users , 2008 .

[33]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[34]  Melanie Nind,et al.  Learning as Researchers and Teachers: The Development of a Pedagogical Culture for Social Science Research Methods? , 2014 .

[35]  Nigel Fielding,et al.  Using Computers in Qualitative Research , 1991 .

[36]  Ann Lewins,et al.  Qualitative phase of the formative evaluation of learningtraining needs in computer assisted qualitative data analysis. , 2006 .

[37]  Marian Carcary,et al.  Evidence Analysis Using CAQDAS: Insights From a Qualitative Researcher , 2011 .

[38]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication , 1992, MIS Q..

[39]  Graham R. Gibbs,et al.  Using software in qualitative analysis , 2013 .

[40]  L. Richards.  Qualitative computing--a methods revolution? , 2002 .

[41]  Nigel Fielding,et al.  Opening up open-ended survey data using qualitative software , 2013 .

[42]  C. Silver,et al.  From guided-instruction to facilitation of learning: the development of Five-level QDA as a CAQDAS pedagogy that explicates the practices of expert users , 2015 .

[43]  Elif Kuş Saillard,et al.  Systematic versus interpretive analysis with two CAQDAS packages: NVivo and MAXQDA , 2011 .

[44]  Ann Lewins,et al.  Using Software in Qualitative Research: A Step-by-Step Guide , 2007 .

[45]  Graham R. Gibbs,et al.  The Use of New Technology in Qualitative Research , 2002 .