Induced emotional interpretation bias and anxiety.

Five experiments are reported showing that the interpretation of personally relevant emotional information can be modified by systematic exposure to congruent exemplars. Participants were induced to interpret ambiguous information in a relatively threatening or a benign way. Comparison with a baseline condition suggested that negative and positive induction had similar but opposing effects. Induction of an interpretative bias did not require active generation of personally relevant meanings, but such active processing was necessary before state anxiety changed in parallel with the induced interpretative bias. These findings provide evidence consistent with a causal link between the deployment of interpretative bias and anxiety and reveal something of the processes underlying this association.

[1]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PC compatibles , 1988 .

[2]  P. Salkovskis,et al.  Misinterpretation of body sensations in panic disorder. , 1997, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[3]  Joseph Wolpe,et al.  Cognitive therapy and emotional disorders: by Aaron T. Beck International Universities Press. $15.00 , 1977 .

[4]  A. Richards,et al.  An Anxiety-Related Bias in Semantic Activation When Processing Threat/Neutral Homographs , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[5]  M. Castillo,et al.  Mood congruent Bias in Interpretation of Ambiguity Strategic Processes and Temporary Activation , 1997 .

[6]  A. Mathews Why worry? The cognitive function of anxiety. , 1990, Behaviour research and therapy.

[7]  D. Wechsler Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. , 1955 .

[8]  G. Bower Mood and memory. , 1981, The American psychologist.

[9]  M. Eysenck,et al.  Ego-threat interpretive bias in test anxiety: on-line inferences , 1994 .

[10]  C. Spielberger,et al.  Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory , 1970 .

[11]  D. Clark A cognitive approach to panic. , 1986, Behaviour research and therapy.

[12]  Andrew Mathews,et al.  COGNITIVE PROCESSES IN ANXIETY , 1983 .

[13]  M. Antony,et al.  The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Trait version: structure and content re-examined. , 1998, Behaviour research and therapy.

[14]  C MacLeod,et al.  Memory accessibility and probability judgments: an experimental evaluation of the availability heuristic. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  R. Friend,et al.  Measurement of social-evaluative anxiety. , 1969, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[16]  A. Mathews,et al.  Interpretative inferences when reading about emotional events. , 1997, Behaviour research and therapy.

[17]  C. MacLeod,et al.  Cognitive functioning and anxiety , 1987, Psychological research.

[18]  M. Eysenck,et al.  Interpretation of homophones related to threat in anxiety states. , 1989, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[19]  C. MacLeod,et al.  Anxiety and the interpretation of ambiguity: a text comprehension study. , 1993, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[20]  M. Eysenck,et al.  Bias in interpretation of ambiguous sentences related to threat in anxiety. , 1991, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[21]  J. Bargh,et al.  Automatic information processing and social perception: The influence of trait information presented outside of conscious awareness on impression formation. , 1982 .

[22]  M. Eysenck,et al.  Interpretation Bias in Test Anxiety: The Time Course of Predictive Inferences , 1997 .

[23]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Inference during reading. , 1992 .

[24]  E. Velten A laboratory task for induction of mood states. , 1968, Behaviour research and therapy.

[25]  E. Tory Higgins,et al.  Knowledge accessibility and activation: Subjectivity and suffering from unconscious sources. , 1989 .

[26]  J. Bargh Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition. , 1989 .