Significance People have long debated about the global influence of languages. The speculations that fuel this debate, however, rely on measures of language importance—such as income and population—that lack external validation as measures of a language’s global influence. Here we introduce a metric of a language’s global influence based on its position in the network connecting languages that are co-spoken. We show that the connectivity of a language in this network, after controlling for the number of speakers of a language and their income, remains a strong predictor of a language’s influence when validated against two independent measures of the cultural content produced by a language’s speakers. Languages vary enormously in global importance because of historical, demographic, political, and technological forces. However, beyond simple measures of population and economic power, there has been no rigorous quantitative way to define the global influence of languages. Here we use the structure of the networks connecting multilingual speakers and translated texts, as expressed in book translations, multiple language editions of Wikipedia, and Twitter, to provide a concept of language importance that goes beyond simple economic or demographic measures. We find that the structure of these three global language networks (GLNs) is centered on English as a global hub and around a handful of intermediate hub languages, which include Spanish, German, French, Russian, Portuguese, and Chinese. We validate the measure of a language’s centrality in the three GLNs by showing that it exhibits a strong correlation with two independent measures of the number of famous people born in the countries associated with that language. These results suggest that the position of a language in the GLN contributes to the visibility of its speakers and the global popularity of the cultural content they produce.
[1]
S. Strogatz,et al.
Linguistics: Modelling the dynamics of language death
,
2003,
Nature.
[2]
P. Bonacich.
Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures
,
1987,
American Journal of Sociology.
[3]
E. Schneider,et al.
Sociolinguistic Theory: Linguistic Variation and Its Social Significance
,
1999
.
[4]
Ethan Zuckerman,et al.
Rewire: Digital Cosmopolitans in the Age of Connection
,
2013
.
[5]
M. Lowe.
Empires of the Word: A Language History of the World.
,
2008
.
[6]
C. Murray,et al.
Human Accomplishment: The Pursuit of Excellence in the Arts and Sciences, 800 B.C. to 1950
,
2003
.
[7]
D. Crystal,et al.
English as a Global Language
,
1998
.
[8]
D. Crystal.
English as a global language: Contents
,
2003
.
[9]
Nicholas David Maclachlan Ostler,et al.
Empires of the Word: A Language History of the World
,
2005
.
[10]
Daniel Pimienta.
Twelve years of measuring linguistic diversity in the Internet: balance and perspectives
,
2009
.