On Bots and Bacteria: Ontology Independent Embodiment

A framework for understanding and exploiting embodiment is presented which is not dependent on any specific ontological context. This framework is founded on a new definition of embodiment, based on the relational dynamics that exist between biological organisms and their environments, and inspired by the structural dynamics of the bacterium Escherichia coli. Full recognition is given to the role played by physically instantiated bodies, but in such a way that this can be meaningfully abstracted within the constraints implied by the term 'embodiment', and applied in a variety of operational contexts. This is illustrated by ongoing experimental work in which the relational dynamics that exist between E. coli and its environment are applied in a variety of software environments, using Cellular Automata (CA) with artificial 'sensory' and 'effector' surfaces, producing qualitatively similar 'chemotactic' behaviours in a variety of operational domains.

[1]  Hubert L. Dreyfus,et al.  The Current Relevance of Merleau-Ponty''s Phenomenology of Embodiment , 1996 .

[2]  J. Crutchfield.  The calculi of emergence: computation, dynamics and induction , 1994 .

[3]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  From Complex Environments to Complex Behaviors , 1996, Adapt. Behav..

[4]  Oren Etzioni,et al.  Intelligence without Robots: A Reply to Brooks , 1993, AI Mag..

[5]  Christopher G. Langton,et al.  Studying artificial life with cellular automata , 1986 .

[6]  R. Brooks.  Living Machines , 2001 .

[7]  Tim Smithers,et al.  On quantitative performance measures of robot behaviour , 1995, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[8]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Biologically Inspired Robotic Experiments on Interaction and Dynamic Agent-Environment Couplings , 1997 .

[9]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  A model of excitation and adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  D. Bray,et al.  Computer analysis of the binding reactions leading to a transmembrane receptor-linked multiprotein complex involved in bacterial chemotaxis. , 1995, Molecular biology of the cell.

[11]  Francisco J. Varela,et al.  Structural Coupling and the Origin of Meaning in a Simple Cellular Automation , 1988 .

[12]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  The role of interactive conceptions of intelligence and life in cognitive technology , 1997, Proceedings Second International Conference on Cognitive Technology Humanizing the Information Age.

[13]  S. Kauffman.  Metabolic stability and epigenesis in randomly constructed genetic nets. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[14]  R. Beer,et al.  Biorobotic approaches to the study of motor systems , 1998, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[15]  Stanley J. Rosenschein,et al.  A dynamical systems perspective on agent-environment interaction , 1996 .

[16]  Rolf Pfeifer,et al.  Cognition - perspectives from autonomous agents , 1995, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[17]  Rodney A. Brooks,et al.  Intelligence Without Reason , 1991, IJCAI.

[18]  Erich Prem.  New AI: Naturalness Revealed in the Study of Artificial Intelligence , 1995 .

[19]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Phenomenology of perception. , 1978, Science.

[20]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  The Art of Designing Socially Intelligent Agents: Science, Fiction, and the Human in the Loop , 1998, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[21]  Thomas S. Ray.  A Proposal to Create a Network-Wide Biodiversity Reserve For Digital Organisms , 1995 .

[22]  Chrystopher L. Nehaniv,et al.  The essence of embodiment: A framework for understanding and exploiting structural coupling between system and environment , 2001 .

[23]  Rodney A. Brooks,et al.  Real Robots, Real Learning Problems , 1993 .

[24]  Alexandros Moukas.  Amalthaea Information Discovery and Filtering Using a Multiagent Evolving Ecosystem , 1997, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[25]  Randall D. Beer,et al.  The brain has a body: adaptive behavior emerges from interactions of nervous system, body and environment , 1997, Trends in Neurosciences.

[26]  D. Parisi.  An Artificial Life Approach to Language , 1997, Brain and Language.

[27]  S. Wolfram.  Statistical mechanics of cellular automata , 1983 .

[28]  D. Bray,et al.  Receptor clustering as a cellular mechanism to control sensitivity , 1998, Nature.

[29]  D. Bray,et al.  Origins of individual swimming behavior in bacteria. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[30]  Stan Franklin,et al.  Autonomous Agents as Embodied Ai , 1997, Cybern. Syst..

[31]  Stefano Nolfi,et al.  Evolutionary Robotics: Exploiting the Full Power of Self-organization , 1998, Connect. Sci..

[32]  Arantxa Etxeverria.  The Origins of Order , 1993 .

[33]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  Adaptive information agents in distributed textual environments , 1998, AGENTS '98.

[34]  Erich Prem,et al.  Epistemic Autonomy in Models of Living Systems , 1997 .

[35]  S. Leibler,et al.  Robustness in simple biochemical networks , 1997, Nature.

[36]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  The origins of order , 1993 .

[37]  Sridhar Mahadevan,et al.  Robot Learning , 1993 .

[38]  Rodney A. Brooks,et al.  Elephants don't play chess , 1990, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[39]  Michael Wheeler,et al.  Cognition's Coming Home: the Reunion of Life and Mind , 1997 .

[40]  F. Varela.  Principles of biological autonomy , 1979 .

[41]  T. Gelder,et al.  The dynamical hypothesis in cognitive science , 1998, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[42]  Melanie Mitchell,et al.  Evolving cellular automata to perform computations: mechanisms and impediments , 1994 .

[43]  F. McMorris,et al.  Mathematical Hierarchies and Biology , 1997 .

[44]  G. Miller,et al.  Artificial Evolution: A New Path for Artificial Intelligence? , 1997, Brain and Cognition.

[45]  R. Somogyi,et al.  The gene expression matrix: towards the extraction of genetic network architectures , 1997 .