Yeast as a model organism for studying the evolution of non-standard genetic codes.

During the last 30 years, a number of alterations to the standard genetic code have been uncovered both in prokaryotes and eukaryotic nuclear and mitochondrial genomes. But, the study of the evolutionary pathways and molecular mechanisms of codon identity redefinition has been largely ignored due to the assumption that non-standard genetic codes can only evolve through neutral evolutionary mechanisms and that they have no functional significance. The recent discovery of a genetic code change in the genus Candida that evolved through an ambiguous messenger RNA decoding mechanism is bringing that naive assumption to an abrupt end by showing, in a rather dramatic way, that genetic code changes have profound physiological and evolutionary consequences for the species that redefine codon identity. In this paper, the recent data on the evolution of the Candida genetic code are reviewed and an experimental framework based on forced evolution, molecular genetics and comparative and functional genomics methodologies is put forward for the study of non-standard genetic codes and genetic code ambiguity in general. Additionally, the importance of using Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a model organism for elucidating the evolutionary pathway of the Candida and other genetic code changes is emphasised.

[1]  M. Tuite,et al.  Codon reassignment in Candida species: an evolutionary conundrum. , 1996, Biochimie.

[2]  André Goffeau,et al.  The yeast genome directory. , 1997, Nature.

[3]  S. Osawa,et al.  Codon reassignment (codon capture) in evolution , 1989, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[4]  M. Tuite,et al.  The non‐standard genetic code of Candida spp.: an evolving genetic code or a novel mechanism for adaptation? , 1997, Molecular microbiology.

[5]  M. Tuite,et al.  Transfer RNA structural change is a key element in the reassignment of the CUG codon in Candida albicans. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[6]  E. J. Murgola.  tRNA, suppression, and the code. , 1985, Annual review of genetics.

[7]  W. H. Mager,et al.  General stress response: In search of a common denominator. , 1997 .

[8]  M. Yarus,et al.  Transfer RNA mutation and the malleability of the genetic code. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  Shin-ichi Yokobori,et al.  Genetic Code Variations in Mitochondria: tRNA as a Major Determinant of Genetic Code Plasticity , 2001, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[10]  S Falkow,et al.  Yeast-enhanced green fluorescent protein (yEGFP): a reporter of gene expression in Candida albicans. , 1997, Microbiology.

[11]  P G Schultz,et al.  Expanding the Genetic Code of Escherichia coli , 2001, Science.

[12]  P. Schultz,et al.  Addition of the keto functional group to the genetic code of Escherichia coli , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Shōzō Ōsawa,et al.  Evolution of the genetic code , 1995 .

[14]  M. Saks.  Making sense out of nonsense , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  T. Ohama,et al.  Non-universal decoding of the leucine codon CUG in several Candida species. , 1993, Nucleic acids research.

[16]  M. Tuite,et al.  Mistranslation induces the heat‐shock response in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1989, Molecular microbiology.

[17]  Laura F. Landweber,et al.  Rewiring the keyboard: evolvability of the genetic code , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[18]  Hiroshi Honda,et al.  The codon CUG is read as serine in an asporogenic yeast Candida cylindracea , 1989, Nature.

[19]  M Yarus,et al.  tRNA structure and ribosomal function. I. tRNA nucleotide 27-43 mutations enhance first position wobble. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  M. Tuite,et al.  The CUG codon is decoded in vivo as serine and not leucine in Candida albicans. , 1995, Nucleic acids research.

[21]  P. Marlière,et al.  Enlarging the Amino Acid Set of Escherichia coli by Infiltration of the Valine Coding Pathway , 2001, Science.

[22]  S. Osawa,et al.  Recent evidence for evolution of the genetic code , 1992, Microbiological reviews.

[23]  Laura F. Landweber,et al.  How Mitochondria Redefine the Code , 2001, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[24]  A. T. Bankier,et al.  A different genetic code in human mitochondria , 1979, Nature.

[25]  T Suzuki,et al.  The 'polysemous' codon--a codon with multiple amino acid assignment caused by dual specificity of tRNA identity. , 1997, The EMBO journal.

[26]  M. Yarus,et al.  On malleability in the genetic code , 1996, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[27]  L. Alberghina,et al.  Evolutionary origin of nonuniversal CUGSer codon in some Candida species as inferred from a molecular phylogeny. , 1995, Genetics.

[28]  Manuel A. S. Santos,et al.  Selective advantages created by codon ambiguity allowed for the evolution of an alternative genetic code in Candida spp. , 1999, Molecular microbiology.

[29]  T. Ohama,et al.  Novel anticodon composition of transfer RNAs in Micrococcus luteus, a bacterium with a high genomic G + C content. Correlation with codon usage. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[30]  Stefan Hohmann,et al.  Yeast Stress Responses , 1997, Topics in Current Genetics.

[31]  M. Gorovsky,et al.  An unusual genetic code in nuclear genes of Tetrahymena. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  A. Hasilik,et al.  UGA is translated as cysteine in pheromone 3 of Euplotes octocarinatus. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  N. Lehman.  Molecular evolution: Please release me, genetic code , 2001, Current Biology.