CT analysis of defects of the cement mantle and alignment of the stem: in vitro comparison of Charnley-Kerboul femoral hip implants inserted line-to-line and undersized in paired femora.
暂无分享,去创建一个
J de Mey | R Deklerck | P. Noble | R. Deklerck | J. de Mey | T. Scheerlinck | P C Noble | T Scheerlinck | J. Mey | Prisca Noble
[1] K. Terayama,et al. Predisposing factors in fixation failure of femoral prostheses following primary Charnley low friction arthroplasty. A 10- to 20-year followup study. , 1994, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.
[2] K. Markolf,et al. In vitro measurement of bone-acrylic interface pressure during femoral component insertion. , 1976, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.
[3] A Sarmiento,et al. The cement mantle in total hip arthroplasty. Analysis of long-term radiographic results. , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.
[4] L. Kerboull,et al. Long-Term Results of Charnley-Kerboull Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Younger Than 50 Years , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.
[5] Robert B. Bourne,et al. Three-Dimensional Analysis of the Cement Mantle in Total Hip Arthroplasty , 2001 .
[6] C. Ranawat,et al. Fifteen-year survivorship of a collarless, cemented, normalized femoral stem in primary hybrid total hip arthroplasty with a modified third-generation cement technique. , 2003, The Journal of arthroplasty.
[7] W H Harris,et al. Localized osteolysis in stable, non-septic total hip replacement. , 1986, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.
[8] Julius T. Tou,et al. Pattern Recognition Principles , 1974 .
[9] Tomoyuki Saito,et al. Mechanisms of failure of total hip replacements: lessons learned from retrieval studies. , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.
[10] H. Tullos,et al. Proximal and Distal Femoral Centralizers in Modern Cemented Hip Arthroplasty , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.
[11] A. McCaskie,et al. Cement pressurisation during hip replacement. , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.
[12] L. Ripley,et al. The femoral cement mantle in three total hip replacements , 2004, International Orthopaedics.
[13] P F Leyvraz,et al. The fixation of the cemented femoral component. Effects of stem stiffness, cement thickness and roughness of the cement-bone surface. , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.
[14] Amos Race,et al. Cement microcracks in thin-mantle regions after in vitro fatigue loading. , 2004, The Journal of arthroplasty.
[15] D. McMahon,et al. Osteolysis after Charnley primary low-friction arthroplasty. A comparison of two matched paired groups. , 1998, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.
[16] U. Schneider,et al. Lavage technique in total hip arthroplasty: jet lavage produces better cement penetration than syringe lavage in the proximal femur. , 2000, The Journal of arthroplasty.
[17] M. Panjabi,et al. Effect of pressurization on methylmethacrylate-bone interdigitation: an in vitro study of canine femora. , 1983, Journal of biomechanics.
[18] U. Schneider,et al. Cement penetration in the proximal femur does not depend on broach surface finish , 2001, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.
[19] P. B. Hanson,et al. Total hip arthroplasty cemented femoral component distal stem centralizer. Effect on stem centralization and cement mantle. , 1995, The Journal of arthroplasty.
[20] C. Howie,et al. Localised endosteal bone lysis in relation to the femoral components of cemented total hip arthroplasties. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.
[21] L. Lidgren,et al. Interface gap after implantation of a cemented femoral stem in pigs. , 1999, Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica.
[22] W. Maloney,et al. Bone lysis in well-fixed cemented femoral components. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.
[23] L. Sedel,et al. The 'French paradox.'. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.
[24] D. Ayers,et al. The importance of proximal cement filling of the calcar region: a biomechanical justification. , 2003, The Journal of arthroplasty.
[25] P. D. de Groen. An Introduction to Total Least Squares , 1996 .
[26] R. Barrack. Early failure of modern cemented stems. , 2000, The Journal of arthroplasty.
[27] B. Wroblewski. The natural history of debonding of the femoral component from the cement and its effect on long-term survival of Charnley total hip replacements. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.
[28] W. Maloney,et al. Importance of a Thin Cement Mantle: Autopsy Studies of Eight Hips , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.
[29] S. Tamai,et al. Thin cement mantle and osteolysis with a precoated stem. , 1999, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.
[30] H. Tullos,et al. Factors influencing pressurization of the femoral canal during cemented total hip arthroplasty. , 1995, The Journal of arthroplasty.
[31] A. McCaskie,et al. A comparison of 2 modern femoral cementing techniques: analysis by cement-bone interface pressure measurements, computerized image analysis, and static mechanical testing. , 2000, The Journal of arthroplasty.
[32] W. Harris,et al. Femoral cement pressurization during total hip arthroplasty. The role of different femoral stems with reference to stem size and shape. , 1984, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.
[33] Amos Race,et al. Early cement damage around a femoral stem is concentrated at the cement/bone interface. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.
[34] V. Pinskerova,et al. Should the cement mantle around the femoral component be thick or thin? , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.
[35] Philip C. Noble,et al. Pressurization and Centralization Enhance the Quality and Reproducibility of Cement Mantles , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.
[36] R. Deklerck,et al. In vitro analysis of the cement mantle of femoral hip implants: Development and validation of a CT‐scan based measurement tool , 2005, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.