Metabarcoding of marine zooplankton: prospects, progress and pitfalls

Metabarcoding (large-scale taxonomic identification of complex samples via analysis of one or few orthologous DNA regions, called barcodes) is revolutionizing analysis of biodiversity of marine zooplankton assemblages. Metabarcoding relies on high-throughput DNA sequencing (HTS) technologies, which yield millions of DNA sequences in parallel and allow large-scale analysis of environmental samples. Metabarcoding studies of marine zooplankton have used various regions of nuclear small- (18S) and large-subunit (28S) rRNA, which allow accurate classification of novel sequences and reliable amplification with consensus primers, but- due to their relatively conserved nature- may underestimate species diversity in a community. To discriminate species, more variable genes are needed. A limited number of metabarcoding studies have used mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I (COI), which ensures detection of species-level diversity, but may require group-specific primers and thus result in inconsistent amplification success rates. Reference databases with sequences for accurately-identified species are critically needed to allow taxonomic designation of molecular operational taxonomic units (MOTU) and comparison with previous studies of zooplankton diversity. Potential and promising applications of metabarcoding include rapid detection of impacts of climate change, monitoring and assessment of ecosystem health, calculation of biotic indices, characterization of food webs and detection of introduced, non-indigenous species.

[1]  D. Steinke,et al.  DNA barcoding of marine metazoa. , 2011, Annual review of marine science.

[2]  B. Deagle,et al.  Quantifying sequence proportions in a DNA‐based diet study using Ion Torrent amplicon sequencing: which counts count? , 2013, Molecular ecology resources.

[3]  M. Raupach,et al.  High-Throughput Sequencing—The Key to Rapid Biodiversity Assessment of Marine Metazoa? , 2015, PloS one.

[4]  E. Goetze.  Species discovery in marine planktonic invertebrates through global molecular screening , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[5]  Susan M. Huse,et al.  A Method for Studying Protistan Diversity Using Massively Parallel Sequencing of V9 Hypervariable Regions of Small-Subunit Ribosomal RNA Genes , 2009, PloS one.

[6]  Matej David,et al.  Dose of truth—Monitoring marine non-indigenous species to serve legislative requirements , 2015 .

[7]  C. Möllmann,et al.  Marine Ecosystem Regime Shifts Induced by Climate and Overfishing: A Review for the Northern Hemisphere , 2012 .

[8]  M. Heath,et al.  Integrating conventional microscopy and molecular analysis to analyse the abundance and distribution of four Calanus congeners in the North Atlantic , 2006 .

[9]  Malcolm B. Jones,et al.  Simple molecular method to distinguish the identity of Calanus species (Copepoda: Calanoida) at any developmental stage , 1999 .

[10]  Aibin Zhan,et al.  Unreliable quantitation of species abundance based on high-throughput sequencing data of zooplankton communities , 2015 .

[11]  Mark Blaxter,et al.  Molecular barcodes for soil nematode identification , 2002, Molecular ecology.

[12]  A. Tsuda,et al.  Evaluation of ITS2-28S as a molecular marker for identification of calanoid copepods in the subtropical western North Pacific , 2013 .

[13]  D. Lodge,et al.  Conservation in a cup of water: estimating biodiversity and population abundance from environmental DNA , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[14]  Naiara Rodríguez-Ezpeleta,et al.  Genomics in marine monitoring: new opportunities for assessing marine health status. , 2013, Marine pollution bulletin.

[15]  J. Shultz,et al.  Ecdysozoan phylogeny and Bayesian inference: first use of nearly complete 28S and 18S rRNA gene sequences to classify the arthropods and their kin. , 2004, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[16]  T. Bruns,et al.  Quantifying microbial communities with 454 pyrosequencing: does read abundance count? , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[17]  A. Tsuda,et al.  A metagenetic approach for revealing community structure of marine planktonic copepods , 2015, Molecular ecology resources.

[18]  M. Burgman,et al.  Allocating surveillance resources to reduce ecological invasions: maximizing detections and information about the threat. , 2011, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[19]  Cuong Q. Tang,et al.  The widely used small subunit 18S rDNA molecule greatly underestimates true diversity in biodiversity surveys of the meiofauna , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Making environmental DNA count , 2016, Molecular ecology resources.

[21]  M. Nishida,et al.  Zooplankton diversity analysis through single-gene sequencing of a community sample , 2009, BMC Genomics.

[22]  Wenjing Zhang,et al.  16S rRNA is a better choice than COI for DNA barcoding hydrozoans in the coastal waters of China , 2014, Acta Oceanologica Sinica.

[23]  P. Somerfield,et al.  Next Generation Sequencing Reveals the Hidden Diversity of Zooplankton Assemblages , 2013, PloS one.

[24]  Xavier Pochon,et al.  Targeted gene enrichment and high‐throughput sequencing for environmental biomonitoring: a case study using freshwater macroinvertebrates , 2016, Molecular ecology resources.

[25]  P. Wiebe,et al.  A “Rosetta Stone” for metazoan zooplankton: DNA barcode analysis of species diversity of the Sargasso Sea (Northwest Atlantic Ocean) , 2010 .

[26]  A. Bucklin,et al.  DNA barcoding of Arctic Ocean holozooplankton for species identification and recognition , 2010 .

[27]  Mehrdad Hajibabaei,et al.  Next‐generation sequencing technologies for environmental DNA research , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[28]  H. MacIsaac,et al.  Rare biosphere exploration using high-throughput sequencing: research progress and perspectives , 2015, Conservation Genetics.

[29]  P. Bork,et al.  Eukaryotic plankton diversity in the sunlit ocean , 2015, Science.

[30]  P. Hebert,et al.  Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  Yoji Nakamura,et al.  Effects of plankton net characteristics on metagenetic community analysis of metazoan zooplankton in a coastal marine ecosystem , 2015 .

[32]  Susanna A. Wood,et al.  Development of single and multispecies detection methods for the surveillance and monitoring of marine pests in New Zealand , 2012 .

[33]  Holly M. Bik,et al.  Sequencing our way towards understanding global eukaryotic biodiversity. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[34]  C. Wiuf,et al.  Monitoring endangered freshwater biodiversity using environmental DNA. , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[35]  Anastasija Zaiko,et al.  Metabarcoding approach for the ballast water surveillance--an advantageous solution or an awkward challenge? , 2015, Marine pollution bulletin.

[36]  Douglas W. Yu,et al.  Reliable, verifiable and efficient monitoring of biodiversity via metabarcoding. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[37]  X. Irigoien,et al.  Assessment of Zooplankton Community Composition along a Depth Profile in the Central Red Sea , 2015, PloS one.

[38]  T. Gregory,et al.  The correlation between rDNA copy number and genome size in eukaryotes. , 2003, Genome.

[39]  Pelin Yilmaz,et al.  The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools , 2012, Nucleic Acids Res..

[40]  A. Eiler,et al.  Unveiling Distribution Patterns of Freshwater Phytoplankton by a Next Generation Sequencing Based Approach , 2013, PloS one.

[41]  Anastasija Zaiko,et al.  Metabarcoding approach for nonindigenous species surveillance in marine coastal waters. , 2015, Marine pollution bulletin.

[42]  D. Lindsay,et al.  DNA barcoding of pelagic cnidarians : current status and future prospects (日本プランクトン学会2014年度春季シンポジウム 遺伝子解析とプランクトン研究) , 2015 .

[43]  Á. Borja,et al.  Environmental Status Assessment Using DNA Metabarcoding: Towards a Genetics Based Marine Biotic Index (gAMBI) , 2014, PloS one.

[44]  Louis Legendre,et al.  Marine biodiversity, ecosystem functioning, and carbon cycles , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  Jennifer L. Molnar,et al.  Assessing the global threat of invasive species to marine biodiversity , 2008 .

[46]  R. Danovaro,et al.  Metagenetic tools for the census of marine meiofaunal biodiversity: An overview. , 2015, Marine genomics.

[47]  X. Irigoien,et al.  Zooplankton diversity across three Red Sea reefs using pyrosequencing , 2014, Front. Mar. Sci..

[48]  Frédéric J. J. Chain,et al.  Divergence thresholds and divergent biodiversity estimates: can metabarcoding reliably describe zooplankton communities? , 2015, Ecology and evolution.

[49]  Margaret R. Caldwell,et al.  Harnessing DNA to improve environmental management , 2014, Science.

[50]  A. Albaina,et al.  18S rRNA V9 metabarcoding for diet characterization: a critical evaluation with two sympatric zooplanktivorous fish species , 2016, Ecology and evolution.

[51]  J. Claverie,et al.  Marine protist diversity in European coastal waters and sediments as revealed by high-throughput sequencing. , 2015, Environmental microbiology.

[52]  Mark L. Blaxter,et al.  Second-generation environmental sequencing unmasks marine metazoan biodiversity , 2010, Nature communications.

[53]  Douglas W. Yu,et al.  Environmental DNA for wildlife biology and biodiversity monitoring. , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[54]  A. Tsuda,et al.  Metagenetic community analysis of epipelagic planktonic copepods in the tropical and subtropical Pacific , 2015 .