Integrating Web‐Enhanced Instruction into a Research Methods Course: Examination of Student Experiences and Perceived Learning

Background and Purpose. Classroom technology in the form of Web‐enhanced instruction is becoming widely available and adopted by educators as a supplement to didactic instruction. The research purpose of this qualitative study was to describe physical therapist student experiences and perceived learning during a Web‐enhanced course. A second purpose was to present the instructor's perspective on the scholarship of teaching as defined by Boyer. Subjects. Fifty‐seven fifth‐year physical therapist students enrolled in a 12‐week Web‐enhanced course PTH1405 “Research for Physical Therapists” participated. Methods. Course materials were placed online using BlackboardTM, a Web‐based educational software package. To examine student experiences and learning, data were collected four times during the academic term via discussion board transcripts, chat room transcripts, and reflective papers. The investigator iteratively analyzed each round of data to identify the principle patterns using a qualitative research methodology. Review of data categories by two physical therapist graduate students served as a method of triangulation. Coding categories began as descriptive and progressed to pattern codes and themes. Results. Four themes addressed issues pertaining to: online behavior, communication feature use, students' perspective‐how they learn‐and barriers. Discussion and Conclusion. Students behaved differently when using discussion board and chat room communication features. Discussion boards allowed students to post individual reactions to assignments, view diverse perspectives of their peers, and post threads leisurely. Virtual chat was viewed as duplicative when students could meet in person. Many students articulated a preference for face‐to‐face interaction. Web‐enhanced instruction is one available educational strategy that can potentially foster deeper thinking about an assignment and provide opportunities for students to compare their thinking to their peers. Barriers to online learning can be either technical or nontechnical. Student reflective papers and archival records of online communication provide data that contributes to faculty scholarship on teaching and learning.

[1]  H. Lim,et al.  Comparison of Two Methods of Training Student Physical Therapists to Score the Gross Motor Function Measure , 2000 .

[2]  Brian Dille,et al.  Identifying Predictors of High Risk among Community College Telecourse Students , 1991 .

[3]  Thomas D. Clark,et al.  Using Web-Enhanced Instruction in an Interpersonal Skills Course , 1999 .

[4]  G. Karst,et al.  Model for Ability‐Based Assessment in Physical Therapy Education , 1995 .

[5]  Beth Phillips Simpson Web‐Based and Computer‐Assisted Instruction in Physical Therapist Education , 2003 .

[6]  Henry S. Pritchett,et al.  THE CARNEGIE FOUNDATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING. , 1912, Science.

[7]  L. May,et al.  Assessing the need for change in clinical education practices. , 2002, Physical therapy.

[8]  Margaret B. Stern,et al.  Weaving the Web into the Classroom: An Evolution of Web Enhanced Instruction , 1999 .

[9]  J. Morse,et al.  Qualitative Research Methods for Health Professionals , 1995 .

[10]  K. F. Shepard,et al.  Physical therapist curricula for the 1990s: educating the reflective practitioner. , 1990, Physical Therapy.

[11]  Gene Kinnaly Netiquette: The Rules of the Road for Effective Internet Communication. , 1997 .

[12]  Jason Henry,et al.  The Effectiveness of Computer-Assisted Instruction in Teaching Biomechanics of the Temporomandibular Joint , 1999 .

[13]  Walter Rankin Increasing the Communicative Competence of Foreign Language Students Through the FL Chatroom , 1997 .

[14]  J. B. Arbaugh,et al.  Virtual Classroom versus Physical Classroom: An Exploratory Study of Class Discussion Patterns and Student Learning in an Asynchronous Internet-Based MBA Course , 2000 .

[15]  C. Allen,et al.  Effects of Web-based instruction on learning behaviors of undergraduate and graduate students. , 1999, Nursing and health care perspectives.

[16]  Rena M. Palloff,et al.  Lessons from the Cyberspace Classroom: The Realities of Online Teaching , 2001 .

[17]  Tak-Wai Chan,et al.  An Attempt to Design Synchronous Collaborative Learning Environments for Peer Dyads on the World Wide Web , 1999 .

[18]  Joseph A. Maxwell,et al.  Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach , 1996 .

[19]  G Jensen,et al.  Teaching Physical Therapy Students to Reflect: A Suggestion for Clinical Education , 1991 .

[20]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  The “Virtual Classroom”: Using Computer‐Mediated Communication for University Teaching , 1986 .

[21]  K. Schultze,et al.  Cadaver and Computer Use in the Teaching of Gross Anatomy in Physical Therapy Education , 1999 .

[22]  Judith C. Anderson,et al.  Retention of Anatomical Detail , 2000 .

[23]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Joining Together: Group Theory and Group Skills , 1975 .

[24]  Charles Soukup,et al.  The Gendered Interactional Patterns of Computer-Mediated Chatrooms: A Critical Ethnographic Study , 1999, Inf. Soc..

[25]  Margaret M Plack Computer‐Assisted Instruction Versus Traditional Instruction in Teaching Human Gross Anatomy , 2000 .

[26]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Correlates of Learning in a Virtual Classroom , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[27]  T English,et al.  A distance learning model in a physical therapy curriculum. , 1998, Journal of allied health.

[28]  Thomas W. Treadwell,et al.  Collaborative Teaching over the Internet , 1998 .