Maryland's Green Infrastructure assessment : Development of a comprehensive approach to land conservation

Abstract Like many parts of the US, Maryland is urbanizing rapidly. The scattered pattern of low-density development consumes an excessive amount of land, fragments the landscape, displaces many native species, and disrupts ecosystem functions. Maryland's Green Infrastructure Assessment is a tool developed in the Maryland Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to help identify and rank those areas of greatest statewide ecological importance, as well as those at greatest risk of loss to development. It identifies large contiguous blocks of natural land (hubs), interconnected by natural corridors to allow animal and plant propagule dispersal and migration. Hubs and corridors were ranked within their physiographic region for a variety of ecological and development risk parameters, as well as combinations of these. Prioritization was also done on a finer scale (0.127 ha) for ecological importance and vulnerability to development, allowing a more detailed analysis for site prioritization within the network. The hub and corridor framework identified through the Green Infrastructure Assessment is being used to guide Maryland's ongoing land conservation efforts. At a multi-state scale, the green infrastructure method has been used as the framework for setting landscape ecological priorities within the Chesapeake Bay program. At a regional scale, the method has been used to rank or focus areas for state land conservation programs. Within a local government planning context, the method is now being translated into locally relevant criteria to support county-scale green infrastructure initiatives. Finally, the cell-based ranking method has been incorporated into parcel prioritization that has been used to aid state, local and private land trust conservation decision-making.

[1]  F. Thompson,et al.  Reproductive Success of Migratory Birds in Habitat Sources and Sinks , 1995 .

[2]  A. King,et al.  Dispersal success on fractal landscapes: a consequence of lacunarity thresholds , 1999, Landscape Ecology.

[3]  Craig S. Machtans,et al.  Effects of forest regeneration on songbird movements in a managed forest landscape of Alberta, Canada , 2002, Landscape Ecology.

[4]  I. Mcharg.  Design With Nature , 1969 .

[5]  D. Urban,et al.  Avian response to landscape pattern: The role of species' life histories , 1992, Landscape Ecology.

[6]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  2. Predictive and Practical Metapopulation Models: The Incidence Function Approach , 1998 .

[7]  H. Pulliam,et al.  Ecological Processes That Affect Populations in Complex Landscapes , 1992 .

[8]  A. M. Hersperger,et al.  ROAD ECOLOGY AND ROAD DENSITY IN DIFFERENT LANDSCAPES, WITH INTERNATIONAL PLANNING AND MITIGATION SOLUTIONS , 1996 .

[9]  Douglas S. Powell,et al.  The forest resources of Maryland , 1980 .

[10]  R. G. Wright,et al.  GAP ANALYSIS: A GEOGRAPHIC APPROACH TO PROTECTION OF BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY , 1993 .

[11]  Therese M. Donovan,et al.  Regional Forest Fragmentation and the Nesting Success of Migratory Birds , 1995, Science.

[12]  R. Forman,et al.  Landscape Ecology Principles in Landscape Architecture and Land-Use Planning , 1996 .

[13]  Brent J. Danielson,et al.  The effects of landscape composition and physiognomy on metapopulation size: the role of corridors , 1997, Landscape Ecology.

[14]  R. Haight,et al.  A Regional Landscape Analysis and Prediction of Favorable Gray Wolf Habitat in the Northern Great Lakes Region , 1995 .

[15]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[16]  P. Schippers,et al.  Migration rates of grassland plants along corridors in fragmented landscapes assessed with a cellular automation model , 1997, Landscape Ecology.

[17]  Richard H. Yahner,et al.  Changes in Wildlife Communities Near Edges , 1988 .

[18]  B DeLille,et al.  GREEN STREETS: THE 1991 INTERMODAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION EFFICIENCY ACT AND THE GREENING OF TRANSPORTATION POLICY IN THE UNITED STATES , 1997 .

[19]  Ellen I. Damschen,et al.  Corridors affect plants, animals, and their interactions in fragmented landscapes , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  Clarence Lehman,et al.  10. Habitat Destruction and Species Extinctions , 1998 .

[21]  P. Beier,et al.  Do Habitat Corridors Provide Connectivity? , 1998 .

[22]  David G. Haskell.  Effects of Forest Roads on Macroinvertebrate Soil Fauna of the Southern Appalachian Mountains , 2000 .

[23]  Boris Schröder,et al.  Population dynamics and habitat connectivity affecting the spatial spread of populations – a simulation study , 2004, Landscape Ecology.