The Role of Abatement Costs in GHG Permit Allocations: A Global Stabilization Scenario Analysis

Our objective is to propose permit allocation schemes that lead to a fair distribution of the net abatement cost among regions in a global greenhouse gas (GHG) stabilization scenario. We use a detailed technology-based energy model, World-MARKAL, to determine efficient abatement decisions, and to calculate the regional gross abatement costs (before permit allocation and trading). The net abatement costs are then calculated and used for different permit allocation schemes.

[1]  Ferenc L. Toth,et al.  Fair Weather?: Equity Concerns in Climate Change , 1999 .

[2]  Irving M. Mintzer,et al.  Confronting climate change : risks, implications and responses , 1992 .

[3]  Michel G.J. den Elzen,et al.  Options for differentiation of future commitments in climate policy: how to realise timely participation to meet stringent climate goals? , 2001 .

[4]  Unfccc Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change , 1997 .

[5]  L. Greene EHPnet: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change , 2000, Environmental Health Perspectives.

[6]  Russell J. Molyneux,et al.  Introduction and Overview , 2007, Computational Analysis of Storylines.

[7]  A Different Perspective for Global Climate Policy: Combining Burden Sharing and Climate Protection , 1999 .

[8]  Marshall A. Wise,et al.  International Equity and Differentiation in Global Warming Policy , 1998 .

[9]  J. Waaub,et al.  A decision aid tool for equity issues analysis in emission permit allocations , 2006 .

[10]  Maryse Labriet,et al.  The World-Markal Model and Its Application to Cost-Effectiveness, Permit Sharing, and Cost-Benefit Analyses , 2005 .

[11]  Carlo Carraro,et al.  Efficiency and equity of climate change policy , 2000 .

[12]  S. Rayner,et al.  Equity Issues and Integrated Assessment , 2019, Fair Weather?.

[13]  Sujata Gupta,et al.  An effective allocation criterion for CO2 emissions , 1999 .

[14]  Adam Rose,et al.  The efficiency and equity of marketable permits for CO2 emissions , 1993 .

[15]  Amit Kanudia,et al.  Advanced bottom-up modelling for national and regional energy planning in response to climate change , 1997 .

[16]  O. Godal,et al.  A survey of differentiation methods for national greenhouse gas reduction targets , 1999 .

[17]  Sebastian Oberthür,et al.  The Kyoto Protocol , 1999 .

[18]  Nebojsa Nakicenovic,et al.  Greenhouse gas emission mitigation scenarios and implications , 2001 .

[19]  Leslie G. Fishbone,et al.  Markal, a linear‐programming model for energy systems analysis: Technical description of the bnl version , 1981 .

[20]  J. Linnerooth‐Bayer Climate Change and Multiple Views of Fairness , 2019, Fair Weather?.

[21]  Alain Haurie,et al.  Advanced mathematical programming modeling to assess the benefits from international CO2 abatement cooperation , 1997 .

[22]  James K. Sebenius,et al.  Sharing the Burden , 1992 .