Pareto Optimal Projection Search (POPS): Automated Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning by Direct Search of the Pareto Surface

Objective: Radiation therapy treatment planning is a time-consuming, iterative process with potentially high inter-planner variability. Fully automated treatment planning processes could reduce a planner's active treatment planning time and remove inter-planner variability, with the potential to tremendously improve patient turnover and quality of care. In developing fully automated algorithms for treatment planning, we have two main objectives: to produce plans that are 1) Pareto optimal and 2) clinically acceptable. Here, we propose the Pareto optimal projection search (POPS) algorithm, which provides a general framework for directly searching the Pareto front. Methods: Our POPS algorithm is a novel automated planning method that combines two main search processes: 1) gradient-free search in the decision variable space and 2) projection of decision variables to the Pareto front using the bisection method. We demonstrate the performance of POPS by comparing with clinical treatment plans. As one possible quantitative measure of treatment plan quality, we construct a clinical acceptability scoring function (SF) modified from the previously developed general evaluation metric (GEM). Results: On a dataset of 21 prostate cases collected as part of clinical workflow, our proposed POPS algorithm produces Pareto optimal plans that are clinically acceptable in regards to dose conformity, dose homogeneity, and sparing of organs-at-risk. Conclusion: Our proposed POPS algorithm provides a general framework for fully automated treatment planning that achieves clinically acceptable dosimetric quality without requiring active planning from human planners. Significance: Our fully automated POPS algorithm addresses many key limitations of other automated planning approaches, and we anticipate that it will substantially improve treatment planning workflow.

[1]  Guoping Shan,et al.  Automatic Planning for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Based on Progressive Optimization in RayStation Treatment Planning System , 2020, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[2]  Margie Hunt,et al.  Interobserver variability in radiation therapy plan output: Results of a single-institution study. , 2016, Practical radiation oncology.

[3]  J O Deasy,et al.  IMRT treatment planning for prostate cancer using prioritized prescription optimization and mean-tail-dose functions. , 2008, Linear algebra and its applications.

[4]  Sasa Mutic,et al.  Quantitative metrics for assessing plan quality. , 2012, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[5]  A L Boyer,et al.  Optimization of importance factors in inverse planning. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  I. Rosen,et al.  Implementing IMRT in clinical practice: a joint document of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  Yaorong Ge,et al.  Knowledge‐based planning for intensity‐modulated radiation therapy: A review of data‐driven approaches , 2019, Medical physics.

[8]  Katia Parodi,et al.  Development of the open‐source dose calculation and optimization toolkit matRad , 2017, Medical physics.

[9]  David L Craft,et al.  Approximating convex pareto surfaces in multiobjective radiotherapy planning. , 2006, Medical physics.

[10]  Eugène M.F. Damen,et al.  Adapting automated treatment planning configurations across international centres for prostate radiotherapy , 2019, Physics and imaging in radiation oncology.

[11]  Lei Xing,et al.  Incorporating dosimetric features into the prediction of 3D VMAT dose distributions using deep convolutional neural network , 2019, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  Suresh Senan,et al.  Volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy vs. conventional IMRT in head-and-neck cancer: a comparative planning and dosimetric study. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  Carsten Brink,et al.  Automatic treatment planning improves the clinical quality of head and neck cancer treatment plans , 2016, Clinical and translational radiation oncology.

[14]  Lei Xing,et al.  Image-Guided and Adaptive Radiation Therapy , 2012 .

[15]  C. Ko,et al.  The National Cancer Data Base: A Powerful Initiative to Improve Cancer Care in the United States , 2008, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[16]  James Wheeler,et al.  Variation in external beam treatment plan quality: An inter-institutional study of planners and planning systems. , 2012, Practical radiation oncology.

[17]  Rajat J Kudchadker,et al.  A comprehensive comparison of IMRT and VMAT plan quality for prostate cancer treatment. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  Anqi Fu,et al.  A convex optimization approach to radiation treatment planning with dose constraints , 2018, Optimization and Engineering.

[19]  B. J. Goldsmith,et al.  Comparison of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) vs. Fixed Field Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) Techniques for the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer , 2010 .

[20]  B. Heijmen,et al.  Automation in intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment planning-a review of recent innovations. , 2018, The British journal of radiology.

[21]  Karl Otto,et al.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc. , 2007, Medical physics.

[22]  L Xing,et al.  MO-G-201-03: Deep-Learning Based Prediction of Achievable Dose for Personalizing Inverse Treatment Planning. , 2016, Medical physics.

[23]  Michael G Jameson,et al.  How important is dosimetrist experience for intensity modulated radiation therapy? A comparative analysis of a head and neck case. , 2013, Practical radiation oncology.

[24]  Martin Carolan,et al.  Comparison of prostate IMRT and VMAT biologically optimised treatment plans. , 2011, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[25]  Ke Sheng,et al.  Comparison of Elekta VMAT with helical tomotherapy and fixed field IMRT: plan quality, delivery efficiency and accuracy. , 2010, Medical physics.

[26]  Carsten Brink,et al.  Automatic planning of head and neck treatment plans , 2016, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[27]  Luca Cozzi,et al.  On the pre-clinical validation of a commercial model-based optimisation engine: application to volumetric modulated arc therapy for patients with lung or prostate cancer. , 2014, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[28]  T. Bortfeld,et al.  Improved planning time and plan quality through multicriteria optimization for intensity-modulated radiotherapy. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.