Model order identification and parameters estimation using array processings for small sample support

We propose a sequential algorithm for determining the number of narrow band source signals, and estimation of the parameters associated with the signal (angles and powers) and of the receiver noise power using the noisy sample observed at the receiver sensor arrays. Previous parameter estimates (or initial estimates) are refined multiple times in our sequential approach and also the Newton-based refinement gives continuous-valued estimates so the estimation performance is not limited to the grid resolution. By benchmarking against the Cramer Rao Lower Bound (CRLB), the estimation performance for all parameters of the proposed algorithm achieves near optimal performance even in the low SNR and small sample support region, in which, the sample size can be smaller than the number of sensors in the array. At the same time, the detection (or model order identification) performance outperforms other relevant algorithms.

[1]  Alan Edelman,et al.  Sample Eigenvalue Based Detection of High-Dimensional Signals in White Noise Using Relatively Few Samples , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[2]  Mati Wax,et al.  Detection and localization of multiple sources via the stochastic signals model , 1991, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[3]  H. Akaike,et al.  Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle , 1973 .

[4]  Y. Bar-Ness,et al.  A new approach to array geometry for improved spatial spectrum estimation , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[5]  Thomas Kailath,et al.  ESPRIT-estimation of signal parameters via rotational invariance techniques , 1989, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[6]  Kyuwan Choi,et al.  Detecting the Number of Clusters in n-Way Probabilistic Clustering , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[7]  Daniel W. Bliss,et al.  Adaptive Wireless Communications: Index , 2013 .

[8]  Thomas Kailath,et al.  Detection of signals by information theoretic criteria , 1985, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[9]  T. Engin Tuncer,et al.  Classical and Modern Direction-of-Arrival Estimation , 2009 .

[10]  P. P. Vaidyanathan,et al.  Nested Arrays: A Novel Approach to Array Processing With Enhanced Degrees of Freedom , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[11]  K. Bell,et al.  Maximum likelihood approach to joint array detection/estimation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[12]  Upamanyu Madhow,et al.  Newtonized Orthogonal Matching Pursuit: Frequency Estimation Over the Continuum , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[13]  R. O. Schmidt,et al.  Multiple emitter location and signal Parameter estimation , 1986 .

[14]  Upamanyu Madhow,et al.  Frequency estimation for a mixture of sinusoids: A near-optimal sequential approach , 2015, 2015 IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing (GlobalSIP).

[15]  Daniel W. Bliss,et al.  Adaptive Wireless Communications: MIMO Channels and Networks , 2013 .

[16]  Petre Stoica,et al.  Performance study of conditional and unconditional direction-of-arrival estimation , 1990, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..