Politicians, the Media, and Domestic Audience Costs

Domestic audience costs can help leaders establish credible commitments by tying their hands. Most studies assume these costs without explaining how they arise. I link domestic audience costs to the citizens' ability to sanction the leadership for pursuing a policy they would not want if they had the same information about its quality. How can citizens learn about policy quality? I model two information transmission mechanisms: one potentially contaminated by politically motivated strategic behavior (leader and opposition), and another that is noisy and possibly biased (media). In equilibrium, audience costs can arise from strategic sources only in mixed regimes under relatively restrictive conditions, and cannot arise in autocracies or democracies. However, in democratic polities the media can play a mitigating role and does enable leaders to generate audience costs. Still, their ability to do so depends on the institutional protections guaranteeing freedom of the media from political manipulation. Domestic audience costs are not necessarily linear in regime type, as often assumed in applied research.

[1]  Kenneth A. Schultz Do Democratic Institutions Constrain or Inform? Contrasting Two Institutional Perspectives on Democracy and War , 1999, International Organization.

[2]  Richard A. Brody,et al.  Policy Voting and the Electoral Process: The Vietnam War Issue , 1972, American Political Science Review.

[3]  Kenneth A. Schultz Democracy and Coercive Diplomacy , 2001 .

[4]  H. Dorussen,et al.  Ending Economic Sanctions , 2001 .

[5]  M. Wattenberg,et al.  Throwing the Rascals Out: Policy and Performance Evaluations of Presidential Candidates, 1952–1980 , 1985, American Political Science Review.

[6]  Garry Young,et al.  Good Times, Bad Times, and the Diversionary Use of Force , 1993 .

[7]  Jon A. Krosnick,et al.  News Media Impact on the Ingredients of Presidential Evaluations: Politically Knowledgeable Citizens Are Guided by a Trusted Source , 2000 .

[8]  S. Bennett The Persian Gulf War's impact on Americans' political information , 1994 .

[9]  J. Knopf How Rational Is “The Rational Public”? , 1998 .

[10]  Douglas A. Van Belle,et al.  Press Freedom and Global Politics , 2000 .

[11]  R. Eisinga,et al.  Timing of Vote Decision in First and Second Order Dutch Elections 1978–1995: Evidence from Artificial Neural Networks , 1998, Political Analysis.

[12]  K. Gaubatz Democratic states and commitment in international relations , 1996, International Organization.

[13]  James D. Fearon,et al.  Signaling Versus the Balance of Power and Interests , 1994 .

[14]  Kristopher W. Ramsay Politics at the Water’s Edge , 2004 .

[15]  Kenneth A. Schultz Domestic Opposition and Signaling in International Crises , 1998, American Political Science Review.

[16]  David M. Kreps,et al.  Signaling Games and Stable Equilibria , 1987 .

[17]  Susanne Lohmann,et al.  Why Do Institutions Matter? An Audience–Cost Theory of Institutional Commitment , 2003 .

[18]  Benjamin I. Page,et al.  Foreign Policy and the Rational Public , 1988 .

[19]  Timothy Besley,et al.  Sources of Inefficiency in a Representative Democracy: A Dynamic Analysis , 1998 .

[20]  Peter J. Partell,et al.  Audience Costs and Interstate Crises: An Empirical Assessment of Fearon's Model of Dispute Outcomes , 1999 .

[21]  Kenneth A. Schultz,et al.  The Democratic Advantage: Institutional Foundations of Financial Power in International Competition , 2003, International Organization.

[22]  Morris P. Fiorina,et al.  Retrospective voting in American national elections , 1981 .

[23]  David M. Rocke,et al.  Optimal Imperfection? Domestic Uncertainty and Institutions in International Relations , 1995 .

[24]  Anne E. Sartori The Might of the Pen: A Reputational Theory of Communication in International Disputes , 2002, International Organization.

[25]  Robert Dur Why do Policy Makers Stick to Inefficient Decisions? , 1999 .

[26]  H. E. Goemans War and Punishment: The Causes of War Termination and the First World War , 2000 .

[27]  Alastair Smith Diversionary Foreign Policy in Democratic Systems , 1996 .

[28]  Alastair Smith,et al.  International Crises and Domestic Politics , 1998, American Political Science Review.

[29]  R. Hart,et al.  An Empirical Test of The Audience Cost Proposition , 1996 .

[30]  R. Brody,et al.  Policy failure and public support: The Iran-Contra affair and public assessment of President Reagan , 1989 .

[31]  Alastair Smith ENDOGENOUS ELECTION TIMING IN MAJORITARIAN PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEMS , 1996 .

[32]  Randolph M. Siverson,et al.  The Logic of Political Survival , 2003 .

[33]  Kenneth A. Schultz Looking for Audience Costs , 2001 .

[34]  Valerie Adams,et al.  The media and the Falklands campaign , 1986 .

[35]  John Londregan,et al.  A Model of the Political Economy of the United States , 1991, American Political Science Review.

[36]  M. Baum Going Private , 2004 .

[37]  Brett Ashley Leeds,et al.  Domestic Political Institutions, Credible Commitments, and International Cooperation , 1999 .

[38]  J. Ferejohn Incumbent performance and electoral control , 1986 .

[39]  J. Fearon Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes , 1994, American Political Science Review.

[40]  John H. Aldrich,et al.  Foreign Affairs and Issue Voting: Do Presidential Candidates “Waltz Before a Blind Audience?” , 1989, American Political Science Review.

[41]  Kenneth S. Rogoff,et al.  Equilibrium Political Budget Cycles , 1987 .

[42]  B. Russett Reliable Partners: How Democracies Have Made a Separate Peace , 2004, Perspectives on Politics.

[43]  S. Kernell Explaining Presidential Popularity: How Ad Hoc Theorizing, Misplaced Emphasis, and Insufficient Care in Measuring One's Variables Refuted Common Sense and Led Conventional Wisdom Down the Path of Anomalies , 1978, American Political Science Review.

[44]  B. Geddes Authoritarian Breakdown : Empirical Test of a Game Theoretic Argument , 1999 .

[45]  J. Laffont,et al.  The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model , 2001 .

[46]  D. V. Belle Press Freedom and the Democratic Peace , 1997 .

[47]  E. Mansfield,et al.  Why Democracies Cooperate More: Electoral Control and International Trade Agreements , 2002, International Organization.

[48]  Inés Macho-Stadler,et al.  An Introduction to the Economics of Information: Incentives and Contracts , 1997 .

[49]  J. Mueller,et al.  War, presidents, and public opinion , 1973 .