FAST TRACK PAPER: Surface wave tomography: finite-frequency effects lost in the null space

SUMMARY We compared surface wave tomography models obtained using finite-frequency kernels and ray theory. We systematically changed regularization in both cases and plotted data misfit against the number of independent parameters in the solution. Our tests show that models from finite-frequency kernels and ray-theoretical kernels are statistically similar. This means that any model obtained using one forward theory can be obtained using the other one by appropriately changing the damping constant. It is clear that finite-frequency theory is a better forward theory to represent the wavefield, but the associated inverse problem is not less ill posed. Indeed, current data coverage is such that the solution is dominated by the chosen regularization. This prevents us from achieving a resolution of the order of the Fresnel zone, or beyond, and noticing the benefits of a better forward theory.

[1]  Anatoli L. Levshin,et al.  Global surface wave diffraction tomography , 2002 .

[2]  B. Romanowicz,et al.  The effects of the theoretical formalism and data selection on mantle models derived from waveform tomography , 1999 .

[3]  Barbara Romanowicz,et al.  Seismic waveform modeling and surface wave tomography in a three-dimensional Earth: asymptotic and non-asymptotic approaches , 2000 .

[4]  Qinya Liu,et al.  Tomography, Adjoint Methods, Time-Reversal, and Banana-Doughnut Kernels , 2004 .

[5]  R. Snieder,et al.  Linearized scattering of surface waves on a spherical earth , 1987 .

[6]  Naoshi Hirata,et al.  Generalized least-squares solutions to quasi-linear inverse problems with a priori information. , 1982 .

[7]  J. Woodhouse,et al.  GLOBAL HIGH-RESOLUTION PHASE VELOCITY DISTRIBUTIONS OF OVERTONE AND FUNDAMENTAL-MODE SURFACE WAVES DETERMINED BY MODE BRANCH STRIPPING , 1999 .

[8]  Toshiro Tanimoto,et al.  Waveforms of long-period body waves in a slightly aspherical earth model , 1993 .

[9]  Erhard Wielandt,et al.  Multiple Forward Scattering of Surface Waves: Comparison With an Exact Solution and Born Single-Scattering Methods , 1993 .

[10]  H. Akaike,et al.  Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle , 1973 .

[11]  B. Kennett,et al.  Determination of the influence zone for surface wave paths , 2002 .

[12]  D. Komatitsch,et al.  The Spectral-Element Method, Beowulf Computing, and Global Seismology , 2002, Science.

[13]  J. Trampert,et al.  Implementing spectral leakage corrections in global surface wave tomography , 2003 .

[14]  B. Kennett,et al.  Multimode surface wave tomography for the Australian region using a three-stage approach incorporating finite frequency effects , 2004 .

[15]  R. Snieder.  Large-scale waveform inversions of surface waves for lateral heterogeneity: 1. Theory and numerical examples , 1988 .

[16]  Joseph S. Resovsky,et al.  Probabilistic Tomography Maps Chemical Heterogeneities Throughout the Lower Mantle , 2004, Science.

[17]  G. Schwarz.  Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .

[18]  Maarten V. de Hoop,et al.  On sensitivity kernels for ‘wave-equation’ transmission tomography , 2005 .

[19]  J. Lévêque,et al.  Can finite‐frequency effects be accounted for in ray theory surface wave tomography? , 2004 .

[20]  R. Snieder.  3-D linearized scattering of surface waves and a formalism for surface wave holography , 1986 .

[21]  J. Woodhouse.  Surface Waves in a Laterally Varying Layered Structure , 1974 .

[22]  D. Smeulders,et al.  Validation of first-order diffraction theory for the traveltimes and amplitudes of propagating waves , 2006 .

[23]  B. Kennett,et al.  Sensitivity kernels for finite-frequency surface waves , 2002 .

[24]  J. Tromp,et al.  Theoretical Global Seismology , 1998 .

[25]  Zheng Wang,et al.  Validity of surface‐wave ray theory on a laterally heterogeneous earth , 1995 .

[26]  Maarten V. de Hoop,et al.  Banana-doughnut kernels and mantle tomography , 2005 .

[27]  Guust Nolet,et al.  Wavefront healing: a banana–doughnut perspective , 2001 .

[28]  E. Engdahl,et al.  Finite-Frequency Tomography Reveals a Variety of Plumes in the Mantle , 2004, Science.

[29]  K. Aki,et al.  Amplitude and phase data inversions for phase velocity anomalies in the Pacific Ocean basin , 1987 .

[30]  Jeannot Trampert,et al.  Global phase velocity maps of Love and Rayleigh waves between 40 and 150 seconds , 1995 .

[31]  G. Nolet,et al.  Finite-frequency effects in global surface-wave tomography , 2005 .

[32]  R. Snieder,et al.  The effect of scattering in surface wave tomography , 2002 .

[33]  J. Woodhouse,et al.  Complex Shear Wave Velocity Structure Imaged Beneath Africa and Iceland. , 1999, Science.

[34]  Jeannot Trampert,et al.  Minor-arc and major-arc global surface wave diffraction tomography , 2005 .

[35]  G. Nolet,et al.  Diffraction tomography using multimode surface waves , 1997 .

[36]  Gabi Laske,et al.  CRUST 5.1: A global crustal model at 5° × 5° , 1998 .

[37]  Guust Nolet,et al.  Three‐dimensional sensitivity kernels for surface wave observables , 2004 .

[38]  R. Snieder,et al.  Are we exceeding the limits of the Great Circle Approximation in global surface wave tomography? , 2001 .

[39]  Barbara Romanowicz,et al.  Comparison of global waveform inversions with and without considering cross-branch modal coupling , 1995 .

[40]  J. Ritsema,et al.  Constraints on the correlation of P- and S-wave velocity heterogeneity in the mantle from P, PP, PPP and PKPab traveltimes , 2002 .

[41]  David J. C. MacKay,et al.  Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.