A Meta-Analysis of Competition in Field Experiments

A meta-analysis was conducted on field-competition experiments published in six journals over a 10-yr period. We analyzed the effects of competition on the biomass of organisms belonging to 93 species in a wide variety of habitats. Competition had a large effect overall, with a great deal of heterogeneity in that effect among organisms. There were large differences among trophic levels in competitive effects, but the relative magnitude of competition at different trophic levels was contrary to the predictions of ecological theory. Primary producers and carnivores displayed small to medium effects. In these two groups, interspecific effects did not differ from intraspecific effects, nor did effects differ in terrestrial versus aquatic habitats. The effects of competition on herbivores ranged from large effects on anurans and lotic arthropods, to medium effects on marine mollusks and echinoderms, to effects that were not statistically distinguishable from zero for terrestrial arthropods. Interspecific competitive effects among these herbivore groups were generally less than intraspecific effects. Among primary producers, the effects of competition were not different in high- and low-productivity habitats. Across all taxa, large organisms did not experience greater competitive effects than small organisms, and competitive effects did not depend on the size attained in the absence of competitors. The effects of competition were weakly density-dependent in cases in which it was possible to examine the effects of the density of neighbors. Experiments conducted on caged organisms resulted in greater competitive effects than those with free-roaming and unenclosed organisms. Experiments with small sample sizes, short durations, and poor experimental design were more variable than experiments that were larger, longer, and better planned.

[1]  D. Goldberg,et al.  Patterns and Consequences of Interspecific Competition in Natural Communities: A Review of Field Experiments with Plants , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[2]  D. Tilman,et al.  Component of Plant Competition Along an Experimental Gradient of Nitrogen Availability , 1991 .

[3]  Paul L. Angermeier,et al.  Ecological Experiments: Purpose, Design, and Execution , 1991 .

[4]  James B. Grace,et al.  Perspectives on Plant Competition , 1991 .

[5]  C. Mann.  Meta-analysis in the breech. , 1990, Science.

[6]  James B. Grace,et al.  Components of resource competition in plant communities. , 1990 .

[7]  J. Grace.  On the relationship between plant traits and competitive ability. , 1990 .

[8]  D. Levitan.  Density-dependent size regulation in Diadema antillarum: effects on fecundity and survivorship , 1989 .

[9]  V. Chow.  Intraspecific competition in a fluctuating population of Littorina plena Gould (Gastropoda: Prosobranchia) , 1989 .

[10]  M. Donoghue,et al.  PHYLOGENIES AND THE ANALYSIS OF EVOLUTIONARY SEQUENCES, WITH EXAMPLES FROM SEED PLANTS , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[11]  R. Karban.  Community organization of Erigeron glaucus folivores: Effects of competition, predation and host plant , 1989 .

[12]  E. T. Bauder.  Drought Stress and Competition Effects on the Local Distribution of Pogogyne Abramsii , 1989 .

[13]  F. Chapin,et al.  Competitive Ability and Adaptation to Fertile and Infertile Soils in Two Eriophorum Species , 1989 .

[14]  P. Petraitis.  Effects of the periwinkle Littorina littorea (L.) and of intraspecific competition on growth and survivorship of the limpet Notoacmea testudinalis (Müller) , 1989 .

[15]  R. Alford.  Variation in Predator Phenology Affects Predator Performance and Prey Community Composition , 1989 .

[16]  P. Morin,et al.  Competition Between Aquatic Insects and Vertebrates: Interaction Strength and Higher Order Interactions , 1988 .

[17]  Philip C. Abrami,et al.  Implementation Problems in Meta-Analysis , 1988 .

[18]  L. Oksanen.  Ecosystem Organization: Mutualism and Cybernetics or Plain Darwinian Struggle for Existence? , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[19]  C. Johnson,et al.  Diversity, Patterns of Adaptation, and Stability of Nova Scotian Kelp Beds , 1988 .

[20]  W. Hill,et al.  Experimental Analysis of the Grazing Interaction Between a Mayfly and Stream Algae. , 1987, Ecology.

[21]  F. Wolf.  Meta-Analysis: Quantitative Methods for Research Synthesis , 1987 .

[22]  A. Ellison.  Effects of Competition, Disturbance, and Herbivory on Salicornia Europaea , 1987 .

[23]  G. Polis,et al.  Intraguild Predation and Competition Among Desert Scorpions , 1987 .

[24]  F. Bazzaz,et al.  The Relationship Between Gap Size and Performance of Several Colonizing Annuals , 1987 .

[25]  A. Underwood,et al.  Interspecific Competition Among Subtidal Limpets: Effect of Substratum Heterogeneity , 1987 .

[26]  W. J. Fletcher.  Interactions among subtidal australian sea urchins, gastropods, and algae: effects of experimental removals , 1987 .

[27]  J. P. Grime.  Dominant and subordinate components of plant communities: implications for succession, stability and diversity , 1987 .

[28]  P. Morin.  Interactions Between Intraspecific Competition and Predation in an Amphibian Predator‐Prey System , 1986 .

[29]  S. Ferson,et al.  Competing Reviews, or Why do Connell and Schoener Disagree? , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[30]  J. Sutherland,et al.  Competition conditional on recruitment and temporary escape from predators on a tropical rocky shore , 1986 .

[31]  J. Gurevitch.  Competition and the Local Distribution of the Grass Stipa Neomexicana , 1986 .

[32]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  Analysis of Repeated Measures Experiments , 1986 .

[33]  C. Dickman.  AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF COMPETITION BETWEEN TWO SPECIES OF DASYURID MARSUPIALS , 1986 .

[34]  P. Jernakoff.  The effect of overgrowth by algae on the survival of the intertidal barnacle Tesseropora rosea Krauss , 1985 .

[35]  P. Crowley,et al.  Behavior and Ecological Interactions of Larval Odonata , 1985 .

[36]  R. Alford,et al.  Priority Effects in Experimental Pond Communities: Competition between Bufo and Rana , 1985 .

[37]  S. Ortega.  Competitive interactions among tropical intertidal limpets , 1985 .

[38]  J. Lucas,et al.  Differences and similarities in the community roles of three rocky intertidal surfgrasses , 1985 .

[39]  T. Schoener.  Some Comments on Connell's and My Reviews of Field Experiments on Interspecific Competition , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[40]  Juan J. Armesto,et al.  Experiments on Disturbance in Old‐Field Plant Communities: Impact on Species Richness and Abundance , 1985 .

[41]  J. Felsenstein.  Phylogenies and the Comparative Method , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[42]  Mark A. McPeek,et al.  Predation, Competition, and Prey Communities: A Review of Field Experiments , 1985 .

[43]  C. Moreno,et al.  Herbivory and Structure in a Midlittorial Rocky Community: A Case in Southern Chile , 1984 .

[44]  M. Gilpin,et al.  Perturbation Experiments in Community Ecology: Theory and Practice , 1984 .

[45]  S. Hurlbert.  Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments , 1984 .

[46]  David B. Pillemer,et al.  Summing Up: The Science of Reviewing Research , 1984 .

[47]  Joseph H. Connell,et al.  On the Prevalence and Relative Importance of Interspecific Competition: Evidence from Field Experiments , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[48]  D. Goldberg,et al.  Equivalence of competitors in plant communities: a null hypothesis and a field experimental approach. , 1983 .

[49]  Larry V. Hedges,et al.  A random effects model for effect sizes , 1983 .

[50]  D. Tilman.  Resource competition and community structure. , 1983, Monographs in population biology.

[51]  Gregg B. Jackson,et al.  Meta-Analysis: Cumulating Research Findings Across Studies , 1982 .

[52]  F. Bazzaz,et al.  REGULATION OF FRUIT AND SEED PRODUCTION IN AN ANNUAL LEGUME, CASSIA FASCICULATA' , 1982 .

[53]  Jon Kastendiek.  Competitor-mediated coexistence: Interactions among three species of benthic macroalgae☆ , 1982 .

[54]  G. Glass,et al.  Meta-analysis in social research , 1981 .

[55]  L. Hedges,et al.  Vote-counting methods in research synthesis. , 1980 .

[56]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Evidence for the Existence of Three Primary Strategies in Plants and Its Relevance to Ecological and Evolutionary Theory , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[57]  G. Glass.  9: Integrating Findings: The Meta-Analysis of Research , 1977 .

[58]  G. Glass.  Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research1 , 1976 .

[59]  B. Menge,et al.  Species Diversity Gradients: Synthesis of the Roles of Predation, Competition, and Temporal Heterogeneity , 1976, The American Naturalist.

[60]  Thomas W. Schoener,et al.  Resource Partitioning in Ecological Communities , 1974, Science.

[61]  E. Newman,et al.  Competition and Diversity in Herbaceous Vegetation , 1973, Nature.

[62]  L. Slobodkin,et al.  Regulation in Terrestrial Ecosystems, and the Implied Balance of Nature , 1967, The American Naturalist.

[63]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: the experimenter's hypothesis as unintended determinant of experimental results. , 1963, American scientist.

[64]  L. Slobodkin,et al.  Community Structure, Population Control, and Competition , 1960, The American Naturalist.

[65]  K. Pearson.  ON A METHOD OF DETERMINING WHETHER A SAMPLE OF SIZE n SUPPOSED TO HAVE BEEN DRAWN FROM A PARENT POPULATION HAVING A KNOWN PROBABILITY INTEGRAL HAS PROBABLY BEEN DRAWN AT RANDOM , 1933 .