Computer-Interpreted Electrocardiograms: Benefits and Limitations.

[1]  Hubert V. Pipberger,et al.  Digital Recording of Electrocardiographic Data for Analysis by a Digital Computer , 1959 .

[2]  H. Pipberger,et al.  Preparation of Electrocardiographic Data for Analysis by Digital Electronic Computer , 1960, Circulation.

[3]  J L Willems,et al.  A plea for common standards in computer aided ECG analysis. , 1980, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[4]  M Demeester,et al.  Assessment of the performance of electrocardiographic computer programs with the use of a reference data base. , 1985, Circulation.

[5]  Recommendations for measurement standards in quantitative electrocardiography. The CSE Working Party. , 1985, European heart journal.

[6]  J. L. Willems,et al.  The diagnostic performance of computer programs for the interpretation of electrocardiograms. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  M. Ackerman,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of screening electrocardiograms in long QT syndrome I. , 2001, Pediatrics.

[8]  Douglas B. Fridsma,et al.  Research Paper: Computer Decision Support as a Source of Interpretation Error: The Case of Electrocardiograms , 2003, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[9]  S. Salerno,et al.  Competency in Interpretation of 12-Lead Electrocardiograms: A Summary and Appraisal of Published Evidence , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[10]  Frank Bogun,et al.  Misdiagnosis of atrial fibrillation and its clinical consequences. , 2004, The American journal of medicine.

[11]  Paul Kligfield,et al.  Diagnostic performance of a computer-based ECG rhythm algorithm. , 2005, Journal of electrocardiology.

[12]  N. Goldschlager,et al.  Status of computerized electrocardiography. , 2006, Cardiology clinics.

[13]  M. Guglin,et al.  Common errors in computer electrocardiogram interpretation. , 2006, International journal of cardiology.

[14]  Computer error and acceptable standards for electrocardiographic interpretation. , 2006, Journal of electrocardiology.

[15]  Frank Bogun,et al.  Accuracy of electrocardiogram interpretation by cardiologists in the setting of incorrect computer analysis. , 2006, Journal of electrocardiology.

[16]  E. W. Hancock,et al.  Recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part II: Electrocardiography diagnostic statement list: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College , 2007, Circulation.

[17]  A. Shah,et al.  Errors in the computerized electrocardiogram interpretation of cardiac rhythm. , 2007, Journal of electrocardiology.

[18]  E. W. Hancock,et al.  Recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram. Part I: The electrocardiogram and its technology. A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Car , 2007, Heart rhythm.

[19]  E. W. Hancock,et al.  Recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part II: electrocardiography diagnostic statement list a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College o , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  Paul Kligfield,et al.  Magnitude, Mechanism, and Reproducibility of QT Interval Differences Between Superimposed Global and Individual Lead ECG Complexes , 2007, Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc.

[21]  P. Mele,et al.  The ECG dilemma: guidelines on improving interpretation. , 2008, Journal of healthcare risk management : the journal of the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management.

[22]  Peter Homel,et al.  Interpretation of electrocardiograms by first-year residents: the need for change. , 2009, Journal of electrocardiology.

[23]  E. W. Hancock,et al.  AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part IV: the ST segment, T and U waves, and the QT interval: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  E. W. Hancock,et al.  AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part VI: acute ischemia/infarction: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Card , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[25]  E. W. Hancock,et al.  AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part III: intraventricular conduction disturbances: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[26]  William N Southern,et al.  The Effect of Erroneous Computer Interpretation of ECGs on Resident Decision Making , 2009, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[27]  E. W. Hancock,et al.  AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part V: electrocardiogram changes associated with cardiac chamber hypertrophy: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinic , 2009, Circulation.

[28]  H. Wellens,et al.  The value of the ECG for decision-making at first medical contact in the patient with acute chest pain , 2010, Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation.

[29]  B. Tyl,et al.  Improvement and limitation of the reliability of automated QT measurement by recent algorithms. , 2011, Journal of electrocardiology.

[30]  Richard E Gregg,et al.  Automated serial ECG comparison improves computerized interpretation of 12-lead ECG. , 2012, Journal of electrocardiology.

[31]  S. Chae,et al.  Erroneous Computer Electrocardiogram Interpretation of Atrial Fibrillation and Its Clinical Consequences , 2012, Clinical cardiology.

[32]  Can you trust a computer to read your electrocardiogram? , 2012, The American journal of medicine.

[33]  M. Lehmann,et al.  Prolonged QT Interval Diagnosis Suppression by a Widely Used Computerized ECG Analysis System , 2013, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[34]  Competency in interpretation of 12-lead electrocardiogram among Swiss doctors. , 2013, Swiss medical weekly.

[35]  N. Estes.  Computerized interpretation of ECGs: supplement not a substitute. , 2013, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[36]  J. Saul,et al.  Assessment of the 12-lead ECG as a screening test for detection of cardiovascular disease in healthy general populations of young people (12-25 Years of Age): a scientific statement from the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology. , 2014, Circulation.

[37]  Peter W Macfarlane,et al.  Automatic detection of end QRS notching or slurring. , 2013, Journal of electrocardiology.

[38]  K. Gjesdal,et al.  Visual or computer-based measurements: important for interpretation of athletes’ ECG , 2014, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[39]  P. Macfarlane,et al.  Comparison of automated measurements of electrocardiographic intervals and durations by computer-based algorithms of digital electrocardiographs. , 2014, American heart journal.

[40]  P. Macfarlane,et al.  The Early Repolarization Pattern: A Consensus Paper. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[41]  Makani Purva,et al.  Teaching the interpretation of electrocardiograms: which method is best? , 2015, Journal of electrocardiology.

[42]  M. Shuster,et al.  Part 9: Acute Coronary Syndromes: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. , 2010, Circulation.

[43]  T. Coleman,et al.  Accuracy of methods for diagnosing atrial fibrillation using 12-lead ECG: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2015, International journal of cardiology.

[44]  A. Dubin.  Screening ECGs for young competitive athletes: it is complicated , 2015, Current opinion in pediatrics.

[45]  M. Gulati,et al.  COCATS 4 Task Force 3: Training in Electrocardiography, Ambulatory Electrocardiography, and Exercise Testing. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[46]  H. Huikuri,et al.  Sensitivity and Specificity of Automated Detection of Early Repolarization in Standard 12‐Lead Electrocardiography , 2015, Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc.

[47]  H. Kalantari,et al.  Underestimated and unreported prolonged QTc by automated ECG analysis in patients on methadone: can we rely on computer reading? , 2015, Acta cardiologica.

[48]  J. Hollander,et al.  State-of-the-Art Evaluation of Emergency Department Patients Presenting With Potential Acute Coronary Syndromes , 2016, Circulation.

[49]  J. Villacastín,et al.  The influence of computerized interpretation of an electrocardiogram reading. , 2016, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[50]  Pentti M Rautaharju,et al.  Eyewitness to history: Landmarks in the development of computerized electrocardiography. , 2016, Journal of electrocardiology.

[51]  M. Ezekowitz,et al.  Electrocardiographic Early Repolarization: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association , 2016, Circulation.

[52]  W. Roberts,et al.  AMSSM Position Statement on Cardiovascular Preparticipation Screening in Athletes: Current evidence, knowledge gaps, recommendations and future directions , 2016, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[53]  Jonathan R Studnek,et al.  Electrocardiographic diagnosis of ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: An evaluation of three automated interpretation algorithms. , 2016, Journal of electrocardiology.

[54]  S. Harendza,et al.  How can we improve teaching of ECG interpretation skills? Findings from a prospective randomised trial. , 2016, Journal of electrocardiology.

[55]  P. Macfarlane,et al.  Causes of Prehospital Misinterpretations of ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction , 2017, Prehospital emergency care : official journal of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the National Association of State EMS Directors.

[56]  Marek Brabec,et al.  The variability of automated QRS duration measurement , 2016, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[57]  M. D. De Buyzere,et al.  Accuracy of computer-calculated and manual QRS duration assessments: Clinical implications to select candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy. , 2017, International journal of cardiology.