Errors in radiotherapy: motivation for development of new radiotherapy quality assurance paradigms.

Modern radiotherapy practice has rapidly evolved during the past decade, making use of many highly complex and/or automated processes for planning and delivery, including new techniques, like intensity-modulated radiotherapy driven by inverse planning optimization methods, or near real-time image-guided adaptive therapy based on fluoroscopic or tomographic imaging on the treatment machine. In spite of the modern technology, or potentially because of it in some instances, errors and other problems continue to have a significant impact on the field. This report reviews example errors and problems, discusses some of the quality assurance issues that these types of problems raise, and motivates the development of more modern and sophisticated approaches to assure quality for our clinical radiotherapy treatment methods.

[1]  Nancy G. Leveson,et al.  An investigation of the Therac-25 accidents , 1993, Computer.

[2]  H. Bartelink,et al.  Quality assurance in the EORTC phase III randomised 'boost vs. no boost' trial for breast conserving therapy: comparison of the results of two individual case reviews performed early and late during the accrual period. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[3]  T. K. Yeung,et al.  Quality assurance in radiotherapy: evaluation of errors and incidents recorded over a 10 year period. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[4]  R Calandrino,et al.  Human errors in the calculation of monitor units in clinical radiotherapy practice. , 1993, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[5]  Robert E. Drzymala,et al.  Errors in radiation oncology: A study in pathways and dosimetric impact , 2005, Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics.

[6]  J. Valentin,et al.  Don't step on it , 2000, Annals of the ICRP.

[7]  J. Bernier,et al.  The quality assurance programme of the Radiotherapy Group of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer: past, present and future. , 2005, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[8]  Benedick A Fraass,et al.  A method for evaluating quality assurance needs in radiation therapy. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  C. J. Karzmark,et al.  Medical accelerator safety considerations: report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 35. , 1993, Medical physics.

[10]  R. Macklis,et al.  Error rates in clinical radiotherapy. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  D L McShan,et al.  The impact of treatment complexity and computer-control delivery technology on treatment delivery errors. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  M. Piérart,et al.  High conformality radiotherapy in Europe: thirty-one centres participating in the quality assurance programme of the EORTC prostate trial 22991. , 2004, European journal of cancer.

[13]  L. Kohn,et al.  To Err Is Human : Building a Safer Health System , 2007 .

[14]  G. Eichholz Accidental Overexposure of Radiotherapy Patients in Bialystok , 2004 .