The Benefits of Branching Deregulation

When the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act went into effect in June 1997, it marked the final stage of a quarter-century-long effort to relax geographic restrictions on banks. This article examines an earlier stage of the deregulatory process-the actions taken by the states between 1978 and 1992 to remove the barriers to intrastate branching and interstate banking-to determine how the lifting of geographic restrictions affect the efficiency of the banking industry. The analysis reveals that banks' loan losses and operating costs fell sharply following the state initiatives, and that the cost declines were largely passed along to bank borrowers in the form of lower loan rates. The authors argue that these efficiency gains arose because better performing banks were able to expand their market share once geographic restraints were erased.

[1]  R. Sylla,et al.  Banks and State Public Finance in the New Republic: The United States, 1790–1860 , 1987, The Journal of Economic History.

[2]  Jstor,et al.  Invention in the Industrial Research Laboratory , 1963, Journal of Political Economy.

[3]  Allen N. Berger,et al.  The Transformation of the U.S. Banking Industry: What a Long, Strange Trip It's Been , 1995 .

[4]  Finance and growth: a synthesis and interpretation of the evidence , 1994 .

[5]  M. C. Keeley,et al.  Deposit insurance, risk, and market power in banking , 1988 .

[6]  Philip E. Strahan,et al.  The Finance-Growth Nexus: Evidence from Bank Branch Deregulation , 1996 .

[7]  H. Broadman,et al.  Finance and Growth: Schumpeter Might Be Right , 1993 .

[8]  Dean F. Amel,et al.  The Relationship between Entry into Banking Markets and Changes in Legal Restrictions on Entry , 1992 .

[9]  H. White A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity , 1980 .

[10]  Douglas W. Diamond Financial Intermediation and Delegated Monitoring , 1984 .

[11]  Allen N. Berger,et al.  The efficiency of financial institutions: A review and preview of research past, present and future , 1993 .

[12]  Philip E. Strahan,et al.  Entry Restrictions, Industry Evolution, and Dynamic Efficiency: Evidence From Commercial Banking1 , 1998, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[13]  Donald T. Savage Interstate banking: a status report , 1993 .

[14]  John Martin Chapman,et al.  Branch banking: Its historical and theoretical position in America and abroad , 1980 .

[15]  Marco Pagano,et al.  Financial markets and growth: An overview☆ , 1993 .

[16]  S. McLaughlin The Impact of Interstate Banking and Branching Reform: Evidence from the States , 1995 .

[17]  N. Economides,et al.  The Political Economy of Branching Restrictions and Deposit Insurance: A Model of Monopolistic Competition among Small and Large Banks , 1995, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[18]  E. Kane De Jure Interstate Banking: Why Only Now? , 1996 .

[19]  P. Calem The impact of geographic deregulation on small banks , 1994 .

[20]  R. Hubbard,et al.  Executive Pay and Performance: Evidence from the U.S. Banking Industry , 1994 .