Reference Production as Search: The Impact of Domain Size on the Production of Distinguishing Descriptions.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Per B. Brockhoff,et al. lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models , 2017 .
[2] M. Elsner,et al. Giving Good Directions: Order of Mention Reflects Visual Salience , 2015, Front. Psychol..
[3] H. Westerbeek,et al. Stored object knowledge and the production of referring expressions: the case of color typicality , 2015, Front. Psychol..
[4] M. Schlesewsky,et al. Two routes to actorhood: lexicalized potency to act and identification of the actor role , 2015, Front. Psychol..
[5] Vicente Ordonez,et al. ReferItGame: Referring to Objects in Photographs of Natural Scenes , 2014, EMNLP.
[6] Luke S. Zettlemoyer,et al. See No Evil, Say No Evil: Description Generation from Densely Labeled Images , 2014, *SEMEVAL.
[7] Alexander Koller,et al. Generation of effective referring expressions in situated context , 2014 .
[8] Jeremy M Wolfe,et al. Guided search for triple conjunctions , 2014, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[9] Micha Elsner,et al. Information Structure Prediction for Visual-world Referring Expressions , 2014, EACL.
[10] Tamara L. Berg,et al. BabyTalk: Understanding and Generating Simple Image Descriptions , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.
[11] Frank Keller,et al. Image Description using Visual Dependency Representations , 2013, EMNLP.
[12] Kees van Deemter,et al. Generating Expressions that Refer to Visible Objects , 2013, NAACL.
[13] D. Barr,et al. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.
[14] Aykut Erdem,et al. Visual saliency estimation by nonlinearly integrating features using region covariances. , 2013, Journal of vision.
[15] Martijn Goudbeek,et al. The Effect of Scene Variation on the Redundant Use of Color in Definite Reference , 2013, Cogn. Sci..
[16] J. Theeuwes,et al. Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[17] Michael C. Frank,et al. Predicting Pragmatic Reasoning in Language Games , 2012, Science.
[18] Karl Stratos,et al. Midge: Generating Image Descriptions From Computer Vision Detections , 2012, EACL.
[19] Emiel Krahmer,et al. Toward a Computational Psycholinguistics of Reference Production , 2012, Top. Cogn. Sci..
[20] Emiel Krahmer,et al. Computational Generation of Referring Expressions: A Survey , 2012, CL.
[21] Emiel Krahmer,et al. Factors causing overspecification in definite descriptions , 2011 .
[22] Yiannis Aloimonos,et al. Corpus-Guided Sentence Generation of Natural Images , 2011, EMNLP.
[23] Robert G Alexander,et al. Visual similarity effects in categorical search. , 2011, Journal of vision.
[24] Emiel Krahmer,et al. Non-deterministic attribute selection in reference production , 2011 .
[25] Simon Farrell,et al. Computational Modeling in Cognition: Principles and Practice , 2010 .
[26] Ellen Campana,et al. Natural discourse reference generation reduces cognitive load in spoken systems , 2010, Natural Language Engineering.
[27] Cyrus Rashtchian,et al. Every Picture Tells a Story: Generating Sentences from Images , 2010, ECCV.
[28] Linda Jeffery,et al. Race-specific norms for coding face identity and a functional role for norms. , 2010, Journal of vision.
[29] Yansong Feng,et al. How Many Words Is a Picture Worth? Automatic Caption Generation for News Images , 2010, ACL.
[30] George L. Malcolm,et al. The effects of target template specificity on visual search in real-world scenes: evidence from eye movements. , 2009, Journal of vision.
[31] Ricardo Olmos,et al. New algorithms assessing short summaries in expository texts using latent semantic analysis , 2009, Behavior research methods.
[32] Sabine Süsstrunk,et al. Frequency-tuned salient region detection , 2009, 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
[33] F. E. H. N. Wijermans. The Cambridge Handbook of Computational Psychology , 2009 .
[34] Victor A. F. Lamme,et al. UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Brain responses strongly correlate with Weibull image statistics when processing natural images , 2009 .
[35] Michael L. Mack,et al. Viewing task influences eye movement control during active scene perception. , 2009, Journal of vision.
[36] Eva Belke,et al. Top-down effects of semantic knowledge in visual search are modulated by cognitive but not perceptual load , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.
[37] F. Hamker,et al. About the influence of post-saccadic mechanisms for visual stability on peri-saccadic compression of object location. , 2008, Journal of vision.
[38] C. Koch,et al. Task-demands can immediately reverse the effects of sensory-driven saliency in complex visual stimuli. , 2008, Journal of vision.
[39] Athanassios Protopapas,et al. Check Vocal: A program to facilitate checking the accuracy and response time of vocal responses from DMDX , 2007, Behavior research methods.
[40] Dirk B. Walther,et al. Modeling attention to salient proto-objects , 2006, Neural Networks.
[41] Antonio Torralba,et al. Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: the role of global features in object search. , 2006, Psychological review.
[42] Michael J. Spivey,et al. Inefficient conjunction search made efficient by concurrent spoken delivery of target identity , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.
[43] John D. Kelleher,et al. Incremental Generation of Spatial Referring Expressions in Situated Dialog , 2006, ACL.
[44] Laura Stoia,et al. Noun Phrase Generation for Situated Dialogs , 2006, INLG.
[45] Eva Belke. Visual determinants of preferred adjective order , 2006 .
[46] Kees van Deemter. Generating Referring Expressions that Involve Gradable Properties , 2006, CL.
[47] M. Tanenhaus,et al. Watching the eyes when talking about size: An investigation of message formulation and utterance planning , 2006 .
[48] Karl G. D. Bailey,et al. Do speakers and listeners observe the Gricean Maxim of Quantity , 2006 .
[49] Josef van Genabith,et al. Dynamically structuring, updating and interrelating representations of visual and linguistic discourse context , 2005, Artif. Intell..
[50] Robert Dale,et al. Viewing Referring Expression Generation as Search , 2005, IJCAI.
[51] Pamela W. Jordan,et al. Learning Content Selection Rules for Generating Object Descriptions in Dialogue , 2005, J. Artif. Intell. Res..
[52] B. Gibson,et al. Linguistically mediated visual search: The critical role of speech rate , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[53] Yuhong Jiang,et al. Setting up the target template in visual search. , 2005, Journal of vision.
[54] Matthew W. Crocker,et al. The influence of the immediate visual context on incremental thematic role-assignment: evidence from eye-movements in depicted events , 2005, Cognition.
[55] J. Wolfe,et al. What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[56] Astrid Busch,et al. The Ebbinghaus illusion modulates visual search for size-defined targets: Evidence for preattentive processing of apparent object size , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.
[57] Elizabeth S. Olds,et al. Does Previewing One Stimulus Feature Help Conjunction Search? , 2004, Perception.
[58] B. Rossion,et al. Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart's Object Pictorial Set: The Role of Surface Detail in Basic-Level Object Recognition , 2004, Perception.
[59] Daniel Kersten,et al. Is Color an Intrinsic Property of Object Representation? , 2003, Perception.
[60] Kenneth I Forster,et al. DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.
[61] Kyle R Cave,et al. Roles of salience and strategy in conjunction search. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[62] M. Tanenhaus,et al. Circumscribing Referential Domains during Real-Time Language Comprehension , 2002 .
[63] A. Meyer,et al. Tracking the time course of multidimensional stimulus discrimination: Analyses of viewing patterns and processing times during “same”-“different“ decisions , 2002 .
[64] N. Haslam,et al. Visual search: Efficiency continuum or distinct processes? , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[65] Michael J. Spivey,et al. Linguistically Mediated Visual Search , 2001, Psychological science.
[66] C. Koch,et al. Computational modelling of visual attention , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[67] Elizabeth S. Olds,et al. Partial orientation pop-out helps difficult search for orientation , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.
[68] Elizabeth S. Olds,et al. Tracking visual search over space and time , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[69] Elizabeth S. Olds,et al. The time-course of pop-out search , 2000, Vision Research.
[70] G. Altmann,et al. Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference , 1999, Cognition.
[71] R. Desimone. Visual attention mediated by biased competition in extrastriate visual cortex. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[72] Ehud Reiter. Building Natural-Language Generation Systems , 1996, ArXiv.
[73] W. Cowan,et al. Visual search for colour targets that are or are not linearly separable from distractors , 1996, Vision Research.
[74] J. Palmer. Attention in Visual Search: Distinguishing Four Causes of a Set-Size Effect , 1995 .
[75] Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al. Second-order parallel processing: visual search for the odd item in a subset. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[76] Robert Dale,et al. Computational Interpretations of the Gricean Maxims in the Generation of Referring Expressions , 1995, Cogn. Sci..
[77] J. Palmer. Set-size effects in visual search: The effect of attention is independent of the stimulus for simple tasks , 1994, Vision Research.
[78] J. Wolfe,et al. Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[79] G W Stuart,et al. Preattentive Processing of Object Size: Implications for Theories of Size Perception , 1993, Perception.
[80] G E Legge,et al. Color improves object recognition in normal and low vision. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[81] Zijiang J. He,et al. Surfaces versus features in visual search , 1992, Nature.
[82] Philipp Koehn,et al. Cognitive Psychology , 1992, Ageing and Society.
[83] Susan L. Franzel,et al. Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[84] J. Duncan,et al. Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.
[85] Robert Dale,et al. Cooking Up Referring Expressions , 1989, ACL.
[86] Ken Nakayama,et al. Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions , 1986, Nature.
[87] Douglas E. Appelt,et al. Planning English Referring Expressions , 1985, Artif. Intell..
[88] T. Pechmann,et al. Social interaction and the development of definite descriptions , 1982, Cognition.
[89] J. G. Snodgrass,et al. A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.
[90] A. Treisman,et al. A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.
[91] P. Brockhoff,et al. lmerTest: Tests for random and fixed effects for linear mixed effect models (lmer objects of lme4 package) , 2014 .
[92] Kees van Deemter,et al. Corpus-based metrics for assessing communal common ground , 2012, CogSci.
[93] Michael J. Spivey,et al. The Role of Preview and Incremental Delivery on Visual Search , 2012, CogSci.
[94] Emiel Krahmer,et al. The Impact of Colour Difference and Colour Codability on Reference Production , 2012, CogSci.
[95] J. Wolfe,et al. Visual search , 2008, Scholarpedia.
[96] Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al. Guided Search 4.0: Current Progress With a Model of Visual Search , 2007, Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems.
[97] Michael L. Mack,et al. VISUAL SALIENCY DOES NOT ACCOUNT FOR EYE MOVEMENTS DURING VISUAL SEARCH IN REAL-WORLD SCENES , 2007 .
[98] Author ' s personal copy The role of context in object recognition , 2007 .
[99] Laurent Itti,et al. Models of Bottom-up Attention and Saliency , 2005 .
[100] A. Arts,et al. Overspecification in instructive texts , 2004 .
[101] Julie C. Sedivy,et al. Pragmatic Versus Form-Based Accounts of Referential Contrast: Evidence for Effects of Informativity Expectations , 2003, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[102] Willem J. M. Levelt,et al. Producing spoken language: A blueprint of the speaker , 1999 .
[103] K. Nakayama,et al. Attention, pattern recognition and popout in visual search , 1998 .
[104] K J Vicente,et al. An ecological theory of expertise effects in memory recall. , 1998, Psychological review.
[105] A Found,et al. Parallel coding of conjunctions in visual search , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.
[106] T. Landauer,et al. An introduction to latent semantic analysis , 1998 .
[107] Julie C. Sedivy,et al. Subject Terms: Linguistics Language Eyes & eyesight Cognition & reasoning , 1995 .
[108] R. Desimone,et al. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.
[109] T. Pechmann. Incremental speech production and referential overspecification , 1989 .
[110] W. Levelt. Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1989 .
[111] A Treisman,et al. Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. , 1988, Psychological review.
[112] Hans-Joachim Novak,et al. Strategies for Generating Coherent Descriptions of Object Movements in Street Scenes , 1987 .
[113] Michael A. Arbib,et al. From Schema Theory To Language , 1987 .
[114] Werner Deutsch,et al. Psychologie der Objektbenennung , 1976 .
[115] Matthew H Tong,et al. Please Scroll down for Article Visual Cognition Sun: Top-down Saliency Using Natural Statistics , 2022 .
[116] S. McKee,et al. journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/visres , 2022 .
[117] Zenzi M. Griffin,et al. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article WHAT THE EYES SAY ABOUT SPEAKING , 2022 .
[118] J. Wolfe,et al. What Can 1 Million Trials Tell Us About Visual Search? , 1998 .