Practitioner perceptions of Open Source software in the embedded systems area

There is a growing body of research to show that, with the advent of so-called professional Open Source, attitudes within many organisations towards adopting Open Source software have changed. However, there have been conflicting reports on the extent to which this is true of the embedded software systems sector-a large sector in Europe. This paper reports on attitudes towards Open Source software within that sector. Our results show a high level of acceptance of Open Source products with large, well established communities, and not only at the level of the operating system. Control over the software is seen as fundamentally important. Other key perceptions with Open Source are an easing of long-term maintenance problems and ready availability of support. The classical strengths of Open Source, namely mass inspection, ease of conducting trials, longevity and source code access for debugging, were at the forefront of thinking. However, there was an acknowledgement that more guidelines are needed for assessing Open Source software and incorporating it into products.

[1]  J. Dedrick,et al.  WHY FIRMS ADOPT OPEN SOURCE PLATFORMS: A GROUNDED THEORY OF INNOVATION AND STANDARDS ADOPTION , 2003 .

[2]  Ioannis Stamelos,et al.  Emerging Free and Open Source Software Practices , 2007 .

[3]  Richard Kemp Current developments in Open Source Software , 2009, Comput. Law Secur. Rev..

[4]  John C. Nash Directions for open source software over the next decade , 2010 .

[5]  Christof Ebert,et al.  Open Source Software in Industry , 2008, IEEE Software.

[6]  Pär J. Ågerfalk,et al.  Assessing the role of open source software in the European secondary software sector: a voice from industry , 2005 .

[7]  David Probert,et al.  Quality practices and problems in free software projects , 2005 .

[8]  Bruce Perens,et al.  The emerging economic paradigm of Open Source , 2005, First Monday.

[9]  Keng Siau Advanced Topics in Database Research, Volume 1 , 2002 .

[10]  Ari Jaaksi,et al.  Experiences on Product Development with Open Source Software , 2007, OSS.

[11]  Yelena Yesha,et al.  Digital Library Task Force , 1996 .

[12]  Rahul De',et al.  Notice of Violation of IEEE Publication PrinciplesOpen source reuse in commercial firms , 2004, IEEE Software.

[13]  Lorraine Morgan,et al.  Open innovation in secondary software firms: an exploration of managers' perceptions of open source software , 2010, DATB.

[14]  J. Henkel Selective revealing in open innovation processes: the case of embedded Linux (gekürzte Version) , 2006 .

[15]  Daniel M. Germán,et al.  An Empirical Study of the Reuse of Software Licensed under the GNU General Public License , 2009, OSS.

[16]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Assessing the health of open source communities , 2006, Computer.

[17]  Gregorio Robles,et al.  Volunteers in Large Libre Software Projects: A Quantitative Analysis Over Time , 2007 .

[18]  Imed Hammouda,et al.  Opening Industrial Software: Planting an Onion , 2009, OSS.

[19]  Björn Lundell,et al.  Commodification of Industrial Software: A Case for Open Source , 2009, IEEE Software.

[20]  Joel West,et al.  Value Capture and Value Networks in Open Source Vendor Strategies , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[21]  Anna Syberfeldt,et al.  Open Source Software in Complex Domains: Current Perceptions in the Embedded Systems Area , 2008, AMCIS.

[22]  Martin W. Wallin,et al.  Organizing for Open Innovation:: Focus on the Integration of Knowledge , 2010 .

[23]  Reidar Conradi,et al.  Open Source Collaboration for Fostering Off-The-Shelf Components Selection , 2007, OSS.

[24]  Björn Lundell,et al.  OSS tools in a heterogeneous environment for embedded systems modelling: an analysis of adoptions of XMI , 2005, ACM SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes.

[25]  Bart Jacobs,et al.  Increased security through open source , 2007, Commun. ACM.

[26]  Dae-Wha Seo,et al.  Embedded Linux implementation on a commercial digital TV system , 2003, IEEE Trans. Consumer Electron..

[27]  Björn Lundell,et al.  Perceptions and Uptake of Open Source in Swedish Organisations , 2006, OSS.

[28]  Dave Thomas,et al.  Open Source Ecosystems , 2004, IEEE Softw..

[29]  Björn Lundell,et al.  2G.">On the adaptation of Grounded Theory procedures: insights from the evolution of the 2G , 2005, Inf. Technol. People.

[30]  Tobias Rötschke,et al.  Architecture Analysis needs an Open Source Process , 2001 .

[31]  Arnoud Engelfriet Choosing an Open Source License , 2010, IEEE Software.

[32]  Björn Lundell,et al.  Changing perceptions of CASE technology , 2004, J. Syst. Softw..

[33]  Gregorio Robles,et al.  Free/Libre and Open Source Software: Survey and Study - FLOSS FINAL REPORT , 2002 .

[34]  Björn Lundell,et al.  Open source in Swedish companies: where are we? , 2010, Inf. Syst. J..

[35]  W. Stam When Does Community Participation Enhance the Performance of Open Source Software Companies? , 2008 .

[36]  Toshihiko Yamakami Challenges for Mobile Middleware Platform: Issues for Embedded Open Source Software Integration , 2010, OSS.

[37]  Lorraine Morgan,et al.  How Perceptions of Open Source Software Influence Adoption: An Exploratory Study , 2007, ECIS.

[38]  Jacco H. Wesselius,et al.  The Bazaar inside the Cathedral: Business Models for Internal Markets , 2008, IEEE Software.

[39]  Martin Michlmayr Community Management in Open Source Projects , 2009 .

[40]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  The Transformation of Open Source Software , 2006, MIS Q..

[41]  Mark Aberdour A people-focused , 2022 .

[42]  Lorraine Morgan,et al.  Benefits and Drawbacks of Open Source Software: An Exploratory Study of Secondary Software Firms , 2007, OSS.

[43]  Björn Lundell,et al.  Adopting Open Source development tools in a commercial production environment - are we locked-in? , 2005, EMMSAD.

[44]  Tuija Kuusisto,et al.  The use of embedded open source software in commercial products , 2004, ECIS.