Baseflow control on sediment flux connectivity: Insights from a nested catchment study in Central Mexico

In order to assess the extent of sediment connectivity between uplands and lowlands and to quantify the processes of in-channel deposition and remobilization, measurements of suspended sediment fluxes were conducted in a nested rural catchment of the Mexican Volcanic Belt. Data were collected over one year at three upland sites (3 to 12 km2) and two downstream stations (390-630 km2). Our results show that a structural discontinuity in the catchment (i.e. abrupt slope decrease at the junction between piedmonts and the alluvial plain from 2 to 10% to < 0.1%) could be compensated by functional continuity during floods. Direct conveyance of fine sediment to the outlet occurred when a high stream transport capacity was reached. Erosion of the streambed was observed on various occasions and accounted for up to 50% of the flux leaving the catchment during one event. Conversely, temporary in-channel storage was apparent on other occasions, amounting to up to 52% of the flux recorded upstream during one storm. These two distinct behaviours were approximately equally distributed along the rainy season and strongly driven by the extent of coupling between surface and subsurface water. This work indeed highlights the role of baseflow spatial variations in determining the extent of lowland sediment conveyance. Riverbed erosional processes occurred when large differences in pre-event baseflow values (i.e. at least a twofold longitudinal increase) were observed between the 5-km distant lowland stations. Our findings outline the importance of systematically taking into consideration the baseflow parameter in research focusing on fine sediment transport across scales.

[1]  Peter Strauss,et al.  Comparative calculation of suspended sediment loads with respect to hysteresis effects (in the Petzenkirchen catchment, Austria) , 2010 .

[2]  J. Poesen,et al.  The sediment delivery problem revisited , 2007 .

[3]  C. Prat,et al.  Erosion extension of indurated volcanic soils of Mexico by aerial photographs and remote sensing analysis , 2003 .

[4]  D. M. Powell,et al.  Is sediment delivery a fallacy? , 2006 .

[5]  J. Poesen,et al.  Predicting soil erosion and sediment yield at the basin scale: Scale issues and semi-quantitative models , 2005 .

[6]  R. Batalla,et al.  Groundwater control on the suspended sediment load in the Na Borges River, Mallorca, Spain , 2009 .

[7]  Influence of storm-related sediment storage on the sediment delivery from tributary catchments in the upper Waipaoa River, New Zealand , 1999 .

[8]  Nicolas Gratiot,et al.  Drivers of erosion and suspended sediment transport in three headwater catchments of the Mexican Central Highlands , 2010 .

[9]  Jean-Jacques Macaire,et al.  Sediment yield and storage variations in the Négron River catchment (south western Parisian Basin, France) during the Holocene period , 2002 .

[10]  D. Walling,et al.  Deposition and storage of fine-grained sediment within the main channel system of the River Tweed, Scotland , 1999 .

[11]  Catherine M. Pringle The need for a more predictive understanding of hydrologic connectivity , 2003 .

[12]  Doerthe Tetzlaff,et al.  Catchment processes and heterogeneity at multiple scales—benchmarking observations, conceptualization and prediction , 2010 .

[13]  Hugh G. Smith,et al.  Interpreting sediment delivery processes using suspended sediment‐discharge hysteresis patterns from nested upland catchments, south‐eastern Australia , 2009 .

[14]  J. Downing Twenty-five years with OBS sensors: The good, the bad, and the ugly , 2006 .

[15]  M. Jansson,et al.  Determining sediment source areas in a tropical river basin, Costa Rica , 2002 .

[16]  Desmond E. Walling Linking land use, erosion and sediment yields in river basins , 1999 .

[17]  J. Knox Agricultural influence on landscape sensitivity in the Upper Mississippi River Valley , 2001 .

[18]  J. Syvitski,et al.  Geomorphic/Tectonic Control of Sediment Discharge to the Ocean: The Importance of Small Mountainous Rivers , 1992, The Journal of Geology.

[19]  G. Williams Sediment concentration versus water discharge during single hydrologic events in rivers , 1989 .

[20]  K. Fryirs,et al.  Geomorphology and River Management: Applications of the River Styles Framework , 2005 .

[21]  H. Bork,et al.  Vineyards, hopgardens and recent afforestation: effects of late Holocene land use change on soil erosion in northern Bavaria, Germany , 2003 .

[22]  A. Dedkov 153. The Relationship between Sediment Yield and Drainage Basin Area , 2005 .

[23]  Tom G. Chapman,et al.  A comparison of algorithms for stream flow recession and baseflow separation , 1999 .

[24]  Increase in surface runoff in the central mountains of Mexico: lessons from the past and predictive scenario for the next century. , 2009 .

[25]  C. Alonso,et al.  Suspended sediment dynamics at high and low storm flows in two small watersheds , 2008 .

[26]  Axel Bronstert,et al.  Flood‐based analysis of high‐magnitude sediment transport using a non‐parametric method , 2008 .

[27]  Jeffrey Shaman,et al.  Are big basins just the sum of small catchments? , 2004 .

[28]  D. Regüés,et al.  Seasonal patterns of suspended sediment transport in an abandoned farmland catchment in the Central Spanish Pyrenees , 2009 .

[29]  E. López-Granados,et al.  Runoff, soil loss, and nutrient depletion under traditional and alternative cropping systems in the Transmexican Volcanic Belt, Central Mexico , 2009 .

[30]  Gary Brierley,et al.  Landscape connectivity: the geographic basis of geomorphic applications , 2006 .

[31]  D. Walling The sediment delivery problem , 1983 .

[32]  Chantal Gascuel-Odoux,et al.  Suspended sediment and discharge relationships to identify bank degradation as a main sediment source on small agricultural catchments , 2007 .

[33]  Trimble,et al.  Decreased rates of alluvial sediment storage in the coon creek basin, wisconsin, 1975-93 , 1999, Science.

[34]  N. Gratiot,et al.  Global uncertainty analysis of suspended sediment monitoring using turbidimeter in a small mountainous river catchment , 2011 .

[35]  John Wainwright,et al.  Hydrological connectivity: Linking concepts with practical implications , 2009 .

[36]  J. Lewis,et al.  Turbidity-Controlled Suspended Sediment Sampling for Runoff-Event Load Estimation , 1996 .

[37]  Doerthe Tetzlaff,et al.  Connectivity between landscapes and riverscapes—a unifying theme in integrating hydrology and ecology in catchment science? , 2007 .

[38]  J. Remondo,et al.  Natural and human forcing in recent geomorphic change; case studies in the Rio de la Plata basin. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[39]  K. Fryirs,et al.  Variability in sediment delivery and storage along river courses in Bega catchment, NSW, Australia: implications for geomorphic river recovery , 2001 .

[40]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Scaling in hydrology , 2001 .

[41]  J. Wainwright,et al.  Linking environmental régimes, space and time: Interpretations of structural and functional connectivity , 2008 .

[42]  S. Kuehl,et al.  Floodplain processes in the Bengal Basin and the storage of Ganges–Brahmaputra river sediment: an accretion study using 137Cs and 210Pb geochronology , 1998 .

[43]  J. López‐Moreno,et al.  From plot to regional scales: Interactions of slope and catchment hydrological and geomorphic processes in the Spanish Pyrenees , 2010 .

[44]  N. Gratiot,et al.  Sediment dynamics during the rainy season in tropical highland catchments of central Mexico using fallout radionuclides , 2010 .

[45]  K. Fryirs,et al.  Buffers, barriers and blankets : the (dis)connectivity of catchment-scale sediment cascades , 2007 .

[46]  Yuichi Onda,et al.  Are headwaters just the sum of hillslopes? , 2005 .

[47]  N. Trustrum,et al.  Impacts of land use change on patterns of sediment flux in Weraamaia catchment, New Zealand , 2005 .

[48]  M. Church,et al.  Disequilibrium of Holocene sediment yield in glaciated British Columbia , 1989, Nature.