Quantitative assessment of sodium mass removal using ionic dialysance and sodium gradient as a proxy tool: comparison of high-flux hemodialysis versus online hemodiafiltration.

BACKGROUND Restoration and maintenance of sodium is still a matter of concern and remains of critical importance to improve outcomes in homeostasis of stage 5 chronic kidney disease patients on dialysis. Sodium mass balance and fluid volume control rely on the 'dry weight' probing approach consisting mainly in adjusting ultrafiltration volume and diet restrictions to patient needs. An additional component of sodium and fluid management relies on adjusting the dialysate-plasma sodium concentration gradient. Hypotonicity of ultrafiltrate in online hemodiafiltration (ol-HDF) might represent an additional risk factor in regard to sodium mass balance. METHODS A continuous blood-side approach for quantifying sodium mass balance in hemodialysis and ol-HDF using online ionic dialysance sensor device ("Flux" method) embedded on hemodialysis machine was explored and compared to conventional cross-sectional "Inventory" methods using anthropometric measurement (Watson), multifrequency bioimpedance analysis (MF-BIA) or online clearance monitoring (OCM®) to assess total body water. An additional dialysate-side approach, consisting in the estimation of inlet/outlet sodium mass balance in the dialysate circuit was also performed. Ten stable hemodialysis patients were included in a "ABAB"-designed study comparing high-flux hemodialysis (hf-HD) and ol-HDF. Results are expressed using a patient-centered sign convention, as follows: accumulation into the patient leads to a positive balance while recovery in the external environment (dialysate, machine) leads to a negative balance. RESULTS In the blood-side approach, a slight difference in sodium mass transfer was observed between models with hf-HD (-222.6 [-585.1-61.3], -256.4 [-607.8-43.7], -258.9 [-609.8-41.3] and -258.5 [-607.8-43.5] mmol/session with Flux and Inventory models using VWatson , VMF-BIA and VOCM values for volumes of total body water respectively; global p-value <0.0001) and ol-HDF modalities (-235.3 [-707.4-128.3], -264.9 [-595.5-50.8], -267.4 [-598.1-44.1] and -266.0 [-595.6-55.6] mmol/session with Flux and Inventory models using VWatson , VMF-BIA and VOCM values for volumes of total body water respectively; global p-value <0.0001). Cumulative net ionic mass balance on a weekly basis remained virtually similar in hf-HD and ol-HDF using Flux method (p=n.s.). Finally, the comparative quantification of sodium mass balance using blood-side (Ionic Flux) and dialysate-side approaches reported clinically acceptable i) agreement (with limits of agreement with 95% confidence intervals (CI): -166.2 to 207.2) and ii) correlation (Spearman rho=0.806; p<0.0001) CONCLUSIONS: We validated a new method to quantify sodium mass balance based on ionic mass balance in dialysis patients by using embedded ionic dialysance sensor combined with dialysate/plasma sodium concentrations. This method is accurate enough to support care givers in managing sodium mass balance in dialysis patients. It offers a bridging solution to automated sodium proprietary balancing module of hemodialysis machine in the future.

[1]  P. Ponce,et al.  Evaluation of intradialytic sodium shifts during sodium controlled hemodialysis , 2020, The International journal of artificial organs.

[2]  B. Canaud,et al.  Three compartment bioimpedance spectroscopy in the nutritional assessment and the outcome of patients with advanced or end stage kidney disease: What have we learned so far? , 2020, Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis.

[3]  F. M. van der Sande,et al.  Using Bioimpedance Spectroscopy to Assess Volume Status in Dialysis Patients , 2019, Blood Purification.

[4]  A. Collins,et al.  Fluid and hemodynamic management in hemodialysis patients: challenges and opportunities , 2019, Jornal brasileiro de nefrologia : 'orgao oficial de Sociedades Brasileira e Latino-Americana de Nefrologia.

[5]  B. Canaud,et al.  Is high-volume post-dilution haemodiafiltration associated with risk of fluid volume imbalance? A national multicentre cross-sectional cohort study , 2019, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[6]  B. Canaud,et al.  Automated individualization of dialysate sodium concentration reduces intradialytic plasma sodium changes in hemodialysis , 2019, Artificial organs.

[7]  S. Francis,et al.  Sodium and water handling during hemodialysis: new pathophysiologic insights and management approaches for improving outcomes in end-stage kidney disease. , 2019, Kidney international.

[8]  G. Pontoriero,et al.  Sodium removal and plasma tonicity balance are not different in hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration using high-flux membranes , 2019, Journal of Nephrology.

[9]  B. Canaud,et al.  Zero Diffusive Sodium Balance in Hemodialysis Provided by an Algorithm‐Based Electrolyte Balancing Controller: A Proof of Principle Clinical Study , 2018, Artificial organs.

[10]  J. Vienken,et al.  Hemodiafiltration to Address Unmet Medical Needs ESKD Patients. , 2018, Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN.

[11]  P. Bie Mechanisms of sodium balance: total body sodium, surrogate variables, and renal sodium excretion. , 2018, American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology.

[12]  J. Kooman,et al.  Fluid status assessment in hemodialysis patients and the association with outcome: review of recent literature , 2018, Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension.

[13]  C. Zoccali,et al.  Greater fluid overload and lower interdialytic weight gain are independently associated with mortality in a large international hemodialysis population , 2018, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[14]  F. Gaillard,et al.  From Isonatric to Isotonic Hemodialysis , 2018, Blood Purification.

[15]  H. Kawanishi Is There Enough Evidence to Prove That Hemodiafiltration Is Superior? , 2018, Blood Purification.

[16]  B. Canaud,et al.  Is There Not Sufficient Evidence to Show That Haemodiafiltration Is Superior to Conventional Haemodialysis in Treating End-Stage Kidney Disease Patients? , 2018, Blood Purification.

[17]  M. Picot,et al.  Treatment tolerance and patient-reported outcomes favor online hemodiafiltration compared to high-flux hemodialysis in the elderly. , 2017, Kidney international.

[18]  E. Trinh,et al.  The Dialysis Sodium Gradient: A Modifiable Risk Factor for Fluid Overload , 2017, Nephron Extra.

[19]  L. Uhlmann,et al.  Body composition monitoring-derived urea distribution volume in children on chronic hemodialysis , 2016, Pediatric Nephrology.

[20]  F. Gaillard,et al.  Natremia, Tonicity, and Conductivity Measurements in Hemodialyzed Patients , 2015, The International journal of artificial organs.

[21]  M. Brookhart,et al.  Fluid management: the challenge of defining standards of care. , 2014, Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN.

[22]  J. Campistol,et al.  Bioimpedance-guided fluid management in hemodialysis patients. , 2013, Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN.

[23]  Rajan K. Patel,et al.  Optimal fluid control can normalize cardiovascular risk markers and limit left ventricular hypertrophy in thrice weekly dialysis patients , 2012, Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis.

[24]  B. Canaud,et al.  Probing 'dry weight' in haemodialysis patients: 'back to the future'. , 2012, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[25]  F. Locatelli,et al.  Effect of a plasma sodium biofeedback system applied to HFR on the intradialytic cardiovascular stability. Results from a randomized controlled study , 2012, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[26]  G. Chertow,et al.  Dialysate sodium and sodium gradient in maintenance hemodialysis: a neglected sodium restriction approach? , 2011, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[27]  O. Sergeyeva,et al.  Sodium Gradient: A Tool to Individualize Dialysate Sodium Prescription in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients? , 2011, Blood Purification.

[28]  W. Hörl,et al.  Sodium Setpoint and Sodium Gradient: Influence on Plasma Sodium Change and Weight Gain , 2010, American Journal of Nephrology.

[29]  P. Wabel,et al.  Importance of Whole-Body Bioimpedance Spectroscopy for the Management of Fluid Balance , 2009, Blood Purification.

[30]  P. Chamney,et al.  A comparison of methods for determining urea distribution volume for routine use in on-line monitoring of haemodialysis adequacy. , 2008, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[31]  A. Servais,et al.  Measuring plasma conductivity to detect sodium load in hemodialysis patients. , 2008, Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN.

[32]  C. Tetta,et al.  Online clearance measurement in high-efficiency hemodiafiltration. , 2007, Kidney international.

[33]  T. Petitclerc,et al.  Ionic dialysance: Principle and review of its clinical relevance for quantification of hemodialysis efficiency , 2005, Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis.

[34]  R. Fluck,et al.  Online Conductivity Monitoring: Validation and Usefulness in a Clinical Trial of Reduced Dialysate Conductivity , 2005, ASAIO journal.

[35]  Martin Wilkie,et al.  Determination of urea distribution volume for Kt/V assessed by conductivity monitoring. , 2003, Kidney international.

[36]  T. Greene,et al.  Anthropometrically estimated total body water volumes are larger than modeled urea volume in chronic hemodialysis patients: effects of age, race, and gender. , 2003, Kidney international.

[37]  U. Kuhlmann,et al.  Accuracy and safety of online clearance monitoring based on conductivity variation. , 2001, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[38]  F. Locatelli,et al.  Electrolyte Balancing: Modern Techniques and Outcome , 2000, Blood Purification.

[39]  F. Locatelli,et al.  Relevance of the conductivity kinetic model in the control of sodium pool. , 2000, Kidney international. Supplement.

[40]  B. Béné,et al.  Sodium management in dialysis by conductivity. , 1999, Advances in renal replacement therapy.

[41]  G. Chertow,et al.  Development of a population-specific regression equation to estimate total body water in hemodialysis patients. , 1997, Kidney international.

[42]  J T Daugirdas,et al.  Overestimation of hemodialysis dose depends on dialysis efficiency by regional blood flow but not by conventional two pool urea kinetic analysis. , 1995, ASAIO journal.

[43]  J. Daugirdas Second generation logarithmic estimates of single-pool variable volume Kt/V: an analysis of error. , 1993, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[44]  Polaschegg Hd,et al.  Automatic, noninvasive intradialytic clearance measurement. , 1993 .

[45]  J. Roos,et al.  Sodium balance in renal failure. A comparison of patients with normal subjects under extremes of sodium intake. , 1985, Hypertension.

[46]  F. Gotch,et al.  Serum Sodium Concentration and Body Fluid Distribution during Interdialysis: Importance of Sodium to Fluid Intake Ratio in Hemodialysis Patients , 1984, The International journal of artificial organs.

[47]  F. Gotch,et al.  Hemofiltration: An Unnecessarily Complex Method to Achieve Hypotonic Sodium Removal and Controlled Ultrafiltration , 1983 .

[48]  I. Edelman,et al.  Interrelations between serum sodium concentration, serum osmolarity and total exchangeable sodium, total exchangeable potassium and total body water. , 1958, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[49]  B. Canaud,et al.  What Is the Optimal Target Convective Volume in On-Line Hemodiafiltration Therapy? , 2017, Contributions to nephrology.

[50]  Hans Köhler,et al.  Haemodialysis with on-line monitoring equipment: tools or toys? , 2005, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[51]  P. Watson,et al.  Total body water volumes for adult males and females estimated from simple anthropometric measurements. , 1980, The American journal of clinical nutrition.