From single static to multiple dynamic combinatorial auctions

We apply the provisional agreement protocol (PAP) as a new approach to single static, single dynamic and multiple combinatorial auction problems, and empirically evaluate PAP. PAP benefits over one-shot auctions include: bidders not required to submit all bids and their dependencies; interaction with a changing environment during the auction can improve the solution; less communication when each bidder possesses many bids. PAP's backtracking may allow a better solution to be found than the first (greedy) solution, but can be detrimental with multiple auctions when bids (resources) are limited. With multiple auctions, dynamics and competition increases as resources becomes scarce. Therefore, PAP is likely to perform better when many resources are available, which is when auctions are useful anyway. PAP scales well, and applying PAP to a second domain shows its generality.

[1]  Leon Sterling,et al.  A distributed agent approach to global transportation scheduling , 2003, IEEE/WIC International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology, 2003. IAT 2003..

[2]  Yoav Shoham,et al.  Towards a universal test suite for combinatorial auction algorithms , 2000, EC '00.

[3]  Michael P. Wellman,et al.  Combinatorial auctions for supply chain formation , 2000, EC '00.

[4]  Barbara Dunin-Keplicz,et al.  Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology , 2005 .

[5]  Lawrence M. Ausubel,et al.  Auctioning Many Divisible Goods , 2004 .

[6]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Developing a bidding agent for multiple heterogeneous auctions , 2003, TOIT.

[7]  Onn Shehory,et al.  Optimal Bidding in Multiple Concurrent Auctions , 2002, Int. J. Cooperative Inf. Syst..

[8]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  A Fuzzy-Logic Based Bidding Strategy for Autonomous Agents in Continuous Double Auctions , 2003, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[9]  Michael P. Wellman,et al.  AkBA: a progressive, anonymous-price combinatorial auction , 2000, EC '00.

[10]  Tuomas Sandholm,et al.  Algorithm for optimal winner determination in combinatorial auctions , 2002, Artif. Intell..

[11]  Noam Nisan,et al.  Bidding and allocation in combinatorial auctions , 2000, EC '00.

[12]  Michael P. Wellman A Market-Oriented Programming Environment and its Application to Distributed Multicommodity Flow Problems , 1993, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[13]  Leon Sterling,et al.  Provisional Agreement Protocol for Global Transportation Scheduling , 2005, Applications of Agent Technology in Traffic and Transportation.

[14]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Polynomial algorithms for clearing multi-unit single-item and multi-unit combinatorial reverse auctions , 2002, ECAI.

[15]  David C. Parkes,et al.  Iterative Combinatorial Auctions: Theory and Practice , 2000, AAAI/IAAI.