Targeting smokers with low readiness to change with tailored and nontailored self-help materials.

BACKGROUND Few smoking cessation self-help materials are available for smokers who are not planning to quit. However, computer-tailored interventions can be designed specifically for these smokers. METHODS In a large randomized field trial (N = 843), two different tailored smoking cessation self-help interventions (multiple tailoring and single tailoring) and one standardized smoking cessation self-help guide were compared with a no-information control group and with each other. The contents of the tailored interventions were adapted to individuals' self-reported stage of change, outcome expectations, self-efficacy levels, and smoking behavior. RESULTS The primary outcome measure was forward stage transition. The standardized self-help guide had no effect. Among smokers who were not planning to quit within the next 5 years the multiple-tailored intervention was more effective than the single-tailored intervention. This pattern was supported by the cognitive changes caused by the interventions. Among smokers who were planning to quit within the next 5 years but not within the next 6 months, none of the self-help materials had any effect. CONCLUSION The present results show that the self-help material currently available in the Netherlands, the standardized self-help guide, was not effective among smokers with low readiness to change. However, computer-generated tailored interventions seem a promising means of communicating information on smoking and smoking cessation to these smokers.

[1]  J. Prochaska,et al.  Systems of Psychotherapy: A Transtheoretical Analysis , 1979 .

[2]  J. Prochaska,et al.  Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. , 1983, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[3]  R. Faust,et al.  Self-help smoking cessation and maintenance programs: a comparative study with 12-month follow-up by the American Lung Association. , 1984, American journal of public health.

[4]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[5]  W. Velicer,et al.  Predicting change in smoking status for self-changers. , 1985, Addictive behaviors.

[6]  I. Rosenstock,et al.  The Role of Self-Efficacy in Achieving Health Behavior Change , 1986, Health education quarterly.

[7]  W F Velicer,et al.  Measuring processes of change: applications to the cessation of smoking. , 1988, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[8]  Hein de Vries,et al.  Self-efficacy: the third factor besides attitude and subjective norm as a predictor of behavioural intentions , 1988 .

[9]  K. Cummings,et al.  Format and Quitting Instructions as Factors Influencing the Impact of a Self-Administered Quit Smoking Program , 1988, Health education quarterly.

[10]  P. Mullen,et al.  A randomized trial of a serialized self-help smoking cessation program for pregnant women in an HMO. , 1989, American journal of public health.

[11]  B. Rimer,et al.  Development of a New Self-Help Guide — Freedom From Smoking® For You And Your Family , 1989, Health education quarterly.

[12]  J. Gruman,et al.  Essential Elements of Self-Help/Minimal Intervention Strategies for Smoking Cessation , 1990, Health education quarterly.

[13]  W F Velicer,et al.  Patterns of Change: Dynamic Typology Applied to Smoking Cessation. , 1991, Multivariate behavioral research.

[14]  W F Velicer,et al.  The process of smoking cessation: an analysis of precontemplation, contemplation, and preparation stages of change. , 1991, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[15]  G Godin,et al.  Predictors of smoking behaviour: an application of Ajzen's theory of planned behaviour. , 1992, British journal of addiction.

[16]  John C. Norcross,et al.  In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors. , 1992 .

[17]  J. Prochaska,et al.  Processes of change in smoking cessation: a cross-validation study in cardiac patients. , 1992, Journal of substance abuse.

[18]  W F Velicer,et al.  Assessing outcome in smoking cessation studies. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  E Lichtenstein,et al.  Smoking cessation: what have we learned over the past decade? , 1992, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[20]  A Heyting,et al.  Statistical handling of drop-outs in longitudinal clinical trials. , 1992, Statistics in medicine.

[21]  R. Mermelstein,et al.  The effects and use of maintenance newsletters in a smoking cessation intervention. , 1993, Addictive behaviors.

[22]  W F Velicer,et al.  Standardized, individualized, interactive, and personalized self-help programs for smoking cessation. , 1993, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[23]  V. Strecher,et al.  The effects of computer-tailored smoking cessation messages in family practice settings. , 1994, The Journal of family practice.

[24]  V. Strecher,et al.  Physicians' recommendations for mammography: do tailored messages make a difference? , 1994, American journal of public health.

[25]  H de Vries,et al.  Self-efficacy as an important determinant of quitting among pregnant women who smoke: the phi-pattern. , 1994, Preventive medicine.

[26]  V. Strecher,et al.  Improving dietary behavior: the effectiveness of tailored messages in primary care settings. , 1994, American journal of public health.

[27]  W F Velicer,et al.  The Transtheoretical Model of Change and HIV Prevention: A Review , 1994, Health education quarterly.

[28]  V. Strecher,et al.  Self-efficacy as a predictor for the cessation of smoking: Methodological issues and implications for smoking cessation programs , 1995 .

[29]  W F Velicer,et al.  Distribution of smokers by stage in three representative samples. , 1995, Preventive medicine.

[30]  W F Velicer,et al.  Applying the transtheoretical model to a representative sample of smokers. , 1995, Addictive behaviors.

[31]  A randomized trial of self-help materials, personalized feedback, and telephone counseling with nonvolunteer smokers. , 1995 .

[32]  V. Strecher,et al.  Do tailored behavior change messages enhance the effectiveness of health risk appraisal? Results from a randomized trial. , 1996, Health education research.

[33]  J. Brug,et al.  The impact of a computer-tailored nutrition intervention. , 1996, Preventive medicine.

[34]  W F Velicer,et al.  A criterion measurement model for health behavior change. , 1996, Addictive behaviors.

[35]  Pros and cons of quitting, self-efficacy, and the stages of change in smoking cessation. , 1996 .

[36]  A Dijkstra,et al.  Subtypes within a sample of precontemplating smokers: a preliminary extension of the stages of change. , 1997, Addictive behaviors.

[37]  Gerjo Kok,et al.  The Impact of Computer-Tailored Feedback and Iterative Feedback on Fat, Fruit, and Vegetable Intake , 1998, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[38]  A Dijkstra,et al.  Tailoring information to enhance quitting in smokers with low motivation to quit: three basic efficacy questions. , 1998, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[39]  A Dijkstra,et al.  Computerized tailored feedback to change cognitive determinants of smoking: a Dutch field experiment. , 1998, Health education research.

[40]  A Dijkstra,et al.  Long-term effectiveness of computer-generated tailored feedback in smoking cessation. , 1998, Health education research.

[41]  Aart N. Mudde,et al.  Predicting stage transitions for smoking cessation applying the attitude-social influence-efficacy model , 1998 .

[42]  A Dijkstra,et al.  Tailored interventions to communicate stage-matched information to smokers in different motivational stages. , 1998, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[43]  W F Velicer,et al.  An expert system intervention for smoking cessation. , 1993, Patient education and counseling.