Awareness, Navigation, and Use of Feed Control Settings Online

Control settings are abundant and have significant effects on user experiences. One example of an impactful but understudied area is feed settings. In this study, we investigated awareness, navigation, and use of feed settings. We began by creating a taxonomy of feed settings on social media and search sites. Via an online survey, we measured awareness of Facebook feed settings. An in-person interview study then investigated how people navigated to and chose to set feed settings on their own feeds. We discovered that many participants did not believe ad personalization feed settings existed. Furthermore, we discovered a misalignment in the expectation and the function of settings, especially of ad personalization settings for many participants. Despite all participants struggling to find at least one setting, participants overall wanted to use settings: 94% altered at least one setting they encountered. From these results, we discuss implications and suggest design guidelines for settings.

[1]  Jens Grossklags,et al.  Third-party apps on Facebook: privacy and the illusion of control , 2011, CHIMIT '11.

[2]  Karrie Karahalios,et al.  First I "like" it, then I hide it: Folk Theories of Social Feeds , 2016, CHI.

[3]  Yang Wang,et al.  Nudges for Privacy and Security , 2017, ACM Comput. Surv..

[4]  Jennifer King,et al.  Privacy: is there an app for that? , 2011, SOUPS.

[5]  Clayton Lewis,et al.  Task-centered user interface design , 1993 .

[6]  Barbara S. Chaparro,et al.  The pervasiveness of text advertising blindness , 2014 .

[7]  A. Anderson.  Social Media Use in 2018 , 2018 .

[8]  Alessandro Acquisti,et al.  Imagined Communities: Awareness, Information Sharing, and Privacy on the Facebook , 2006, Privacy Enhancing Technologies.

[9]  Jon Trinder,et al.  The Humane Interface: New Directions for Designing Interactive Systems , 2002, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[10]  Pamela Effrein Sandstrom,et al.  Information Foraging Theory: Adaptive Interaction with Information , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[11]  Pamela J. Wisniewski,et al.  Making privacy personal: Profiling social network users to inform privacy education and nudging , 2017, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[12]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Interaction Anticipation: Communicating Impacts of Groupware Configuration Settings to Users , 2015, IS-EUD.

[13]  Lujo Bauer,et al.  (Do Not) Track Me Sometimes: Users’ Contextual Preferences for Web Tracking , 2016, Proc. Priv. Enhancing Technol..

[14]  Tovi Grossman,et al.  A survey of software learnability: metrics, methodologies and guidelines , 2009, CHI.

[15]  Sam Wineburg,et al.  Evaluating information: The cornerstone of civic online reasoning , 2016 .

[16]  Michael L. Bernard.  Examining User Expectations for the Location of Common E-Commerce Web Objects , 2003 .

[17]  Wai-Tat Fu,et al.  SNIF-ACT: A Cognitive Model of User Navigation on the World Wide Web , 2007, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[18]  L. Cranor,et al.  Nudges for Privacy and Security , 2017, ACM Comput. Surv..

[19]  Klaus Opwis,et al.  Mental models for web objects: Where do users expect to find the most frequent objects in online shops, news portals, and company web pages? , 2010, Interact. Comput..

[20]  Alexandre N. Tuch,et al.  Location matters, especially for non-salient features-An eye-tracking study on the effects of web object placement on different types of websites , 2013, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[21]  Cameron Marlow,et al.  A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization , 2012, Nature.

[22]  Alessandro Acquisti,et al.  Silent Listeners: The Evolution of Privacy and Disclosure on Facebook , 2013, J. Priv. Confidentiality.

[23]  Clayton Lewis,et al.  TASK-CENTERED USER INTERFACE DESIGN A Practical Introduction , 2006 .

[24]  Bertrand Meyer,et al.  Applying 'design by contract' , 1992, Computer.

[25]  Jason Dana,et al.  The default pull: An experimental demonstration of subtle default effects on preferences , 2012, Judgment and Decision Making.

[26]  Eytan Adar,et al.  The PViz comprehension tool for social network privacy settings , 2012, SOUPS.

[27]  Katrien Verbert,et al.  "I Really Don't Know What 'Thumbs Up' Means": Algorithmic Experience in Movie Recommender Algorithms , 2019, INTERACT.

[28]  Karrie Karahalios,et al.  The Illusion of Control: Placebo Effects of Control Settings , 2018, CHI.

[29]  Paul N. Bennett,et al.  Guidelines for Human-AI Interaction , 2019, CHI.

[30]  Annika Wærn,et al.  Towards Algorithmic Experience: Initial Efforts for Social Media Contexts , 2018, CHI.

[31]  Qiuzhen Wang,et al.  An eye-tracking study of website complexity from cognitive load perspective , 2014, Decis. Support Syst..

[32]  Mary C. Dyson,et al.  The effect of violating visual conventions of a website on user performance and disorientation: how bad can it be? , 2008, SIGDOC '08.

[33]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Analyzing facebook privacy settings: user expectations vs. reality , 2011, IMC '11.

[34]  Keith W. Ross,et al.  Facebook users have become much more private: A large-scale study , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops.

[35]  Nanda Kumar,et al.  Improving privacy settings control in online social networks with a wheel interface , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[36]  Lujo Bauer,et al.  Out of sight, out of mind: Effects of displaying access-control information near the item it controls , 2012, 2012 Tenth Annual International Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust.

[37]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  The Impact of Relative Standards on the Propensity to Disclose , 2012 .

[38]  Scott R. Klemmer,et al.  RePlay: Contextually Presenting Learning Videos Across Software Applications , 2019, CHI.

[39]  Lance Sherry,et al.  Designing User-Interfaces for the Cockpit: Five Common Design Errors and How to Avoid Them , 2002 .

[40]  Christian Sandvig,et al.  SOFTWARE DEFAULTS AS DE FACTO REGULATION The case of the wireless internet , 2008 .

[41]  Steven M. Bellovin,et al.  A study of privacy settings errors in an online social network , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops.

[42]  D. Norman.  The Design of Everyday Things: Revised and Expanded Edition , 2013 .

[43]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Web Home Page Complexity and Communication Effectiveness , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[44]  Alexandre N. Tuch,et al.  Is It Still Where I Expect It? - Users' Current Expectations of Interface Elements on the Most Frequent Types of Websites , 2016, Interact. Comput..

[45]  Eric Gilbert,et al.  Predicting tie strength in a new medium , 2012, CSCW.

[46]  Sabri Boughorbel,et al.  Optimal classifier for imbalanced data using Matthews Correlation Coefficient metric , 2017, PloS one.

[47]  Catherine M. Burns,et al.  There Is More to Monitoring a Nuclear Power Plant than Meets the Eye , 2000, Hum. Factors.

[48]  René F. Kizilcec.  How Much Information?: Effects of Transparency on Trust in an Algorithmic Interface , 2016, CHI.