Public support for anti-smoking legislation varies with smoking status.

OBJECTIVE Rural Australians have higher rates of smoking than their urban counterparts, contributing to poorer health outcomes. In 2004, the Queensland Government introduced legislation to reduce the impact of environmental tobacco smoke on the community. The aims of the study were to describe smoking behaviours and associations between smoking behaviour and agreement with current anti-smoking laws. PARTICIPANTS A total of 1208 people over the age of 18 years and living in rural, remote and very remote central Queensland participated in this telephone survey. RESULTS About 22% (n = 130) of female and 21% of male (n = 125) participants identified themselves as smokers. No difference existed between the mean age of smokers (47.3 years) and non-smokers (47.1 years). While there is high level of support for smoking restrictions in public places (75%), attitudes vary with smoking status. Smokers were less likely than smokers to agree that the legislation would create a healthier environment, reduce exposure to passive smoking or agree that 'it is right to ban smoking in public places'. Smokers were significantly more likely to agree that the legislation had gone too far. CONCLUSION The gradual implementation of the anti-smoking legislation is changing social beliefs on what are acceptable smoking practices. It is likely that the legislation within Queensland and the subsequent forced changes in social conditions for smokers will continue to reduce the number of people smoking and reduce exposure to environmental tobacco smoke.

[1]  K. Cummings,et al.  Reductions in tobacco smoke pollution and increases in support for smoke-free public places following the implementation of comprehensive smoke-free workplace legislation in the Republic of Ireland: findings from the ITC Ireland/UK Survey , 2006, Tobacco Control.

[2]  F. Tzelepis,et al.  Regulation of environmental tobacco smoke by Australian drug treatment agencies , 2005, Australian and New Zealand journal of public health.

[3]  F. Tzelepis,et al.  Support for smoking restrictions in bars and gaming areas: review of Australian studies , 2003, Australian and New Zealand journal of public health.

[4]  L. Rushton,et al.  Reducing domestic exposure to environmental tobacco smoke: a review of attitudes and behaviours , 2003, The journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health.

[5]  G. Maguire,et al.  Validation of self‐reported cigarette smoking in a remote Australian Aboriginal community , 2003, Australian and New Zealand journal of public health.

[6]  F. Tzelepis,et al.  Environmental tobacco smoke in homes, motor vehicles and licensed premises: community attitudes and practices , 2002, Australian and New Zealand journal of public health.

[7]  M. Rebagliato Validation of self reported smoking , 2002, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[8]  E Adlaf,et al.  Heterogeneity among smokers and non-smokers in attitudes and behaviour regarding smoking and smoking restrictions. , 2000, Tobacco control.

[9]  C. Rissel,et al.  Smoking: rates and attitudes among nursing staff in central Sydney. , 1999, International journal of nursing practice.

[10]  R. Borland,et al.  Trends in environmental tobacco smoke restrictions in the home in Victoria, Australia , 1999, Tobacco control.

[11]  L. Jorm,et al.  Parental smoking and respiratory illnesses in Australian children aged 0–4 years: ABS 1989–90 National Health Survey results , 1998, Australian and New Zealand journal of public health.

[12]  S. Chapman,et al.  Self-exempting beliefs about smoking and health: differences between smokers and ex-smokers. , 1993, American journal of public health.

[13]  J. Madans,et al.  Validity of mortality analysis based on retrospective smoking information. , 1989, Statistics in medicine.

[14]  Otis Dudley Duncan,et al.  Residential Distribution and Occupational Stratification , 1955, American Journal of Sociology.