Application of a Sediment Quality Triad and Different Statistical Approaches (Hasse Diagrams and Fuzzy Logic) for the Comparative Evaluation of Small Streams

In order to evaluate the ecotoxicological contamination of 12 aquatic sites in streams within the catch ment area of the Neckar River, a sediment quality triad (SQT) approach was applied. In contrast to Chapman's original triad approach, not only sediments, but also surface waters were examined. In brief, to obtain a com prehensive insight into the potential ecotoxicological hazard, both acute toxicity and more specific effects such as mutagenic, genotoxic, teratogenic, dioxin- and estrogen-like responses were recorded. Different statistical methods (ranking, cluster analyses, Hasse diagram techniques, and fuzzy logic) for the evaluation and presentation of the SQT data were compared with respect to the needs of environmental decision-making. Results document advan tages and disadvantages of the methods applied for the evaluation and classification of data within the complex data matrixes. The ranking procedure presented as well as the Hasse diagram technique seem to be suitable tools to elucidate the pattern of the ecotoxicological load. However, these classification methods require expert knowledge to interpret the ranking results with respect to decision-making in environmental sciences and policy. In contrast, fuzzy logic allows both to develop site-specific expert systems in order to assess the ecotoxicological burden and to give insight into the pattern of the contamination.

[1]  Rainer Brüggemann,et al.  An algebraic/graphical tool to compare ecosystems with respect to their pollution. The German River Elbe as an example. I : Hasse-diagrams , 1994 .

[2]  M. Tysklind,et al.  Biological and Chemical Determination of Dioxin-like Compounds in Sediments by Means of a Sediment Triad Approach in the Catchment Area of the River Neckar , 2002, Ecotoxicology.

[3]  P. Montagna,et al.  Implications for monitoring: study designs and interpretation of results , 1996 .

[4]  D. Chapman,et al.  Sediment quality triad assessment survey of the Galveston Bay, Texas system , 1996, Ecotoxicology.

[5]  R. Brüggemann,et al.  An algebraic/graphical tool to compare ecosystems with respect to their pollution V: cluster analysis and Hasse diagrams. , 2000, Chemosphere.

[6]  A. Hendriks,et al.  Ecological and ecotoxicological surveys of moderately contaminated floodplain ecosystems in The Netherlands , 1999 .

[7]  D. Wolfe,et al.  Sediment quality assessment studies of Tampa bay, Florida , 1996 .

[8]  K. Rönnpagel,et al.  Asking for the indicator function of bioassays evaluating soil contamination: are bioassay results reasonable surrogates of effects on soil microflora? , 1998, Chemosphere.

[9]  Rainer Bruggemann,et al.  Comparative analysis of nearshore contaminated sites in lake Ontario: Ranking for environmental hazard , 1997 .

[11]  A. Hendriks Monitoring and Estimating Concentrations and Effects of Microcontaminants in the Rhine-Delta: Chemical Analysis, Biological Laboratory Assays and Field Observations , 1994 .

[12]  G. Linder,et al.  Characterization of ecological risks at the milltown reservoir‐clark fork river sediments superfund site, montana , 1994 .

[13]  Dag Broman,et al.  Toxic potencies of lipophilic extracts from sediments and settling particulate matter (SPM) collected in a PCB-contaminated river system , 1996 .

[14]  Abelardo Gómez-Parra,et al.  Determining contamination sources in marine sediments using multivariate analysis , 1998 .

[15]  H. Leslie,et al.  Triad Assessment of the Impact of Chromium Contamination on Benthic Macroinvertebrates in the Chusovaya River (Urals, Russia) , 1999, Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[16]  Abelardo Gómez-Parra,et al.  Integrative assessment of sediment quality in two littoral ecosystems from the Gulf of Cádiz, Spain , 1998 .

[17]  F. J. Dwyer,et al.  Use of benthic invertebrate community structure and the sediment quality triad to evaluate metal‐contaminated sediment in the upper clark fork river, montana , 1994 .

[18]  J. A. Camargo Performance of a new ecotoxicological index to assess environmental impacts on freshwater communities , 1990, Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[19]  B. Ames,et al.  Revised methods for the Salmonella mutagenicity test. , 1983, Mutation research.

[20]  T. Braunbeck,et al.  Induction of cytochrome P450 1A and DNA damage in isolated rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) hepatocytes by 2,3,7,8 tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. , 1999 .

[21]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[22]  Peter M. Chapman,et al.  THE SEDIMENT QUALITY TRIAD: THEN, NOW AND TOMORROW , 2000 .

[23]  R. Brüggemann,et al.  Ranking of aquatic effect tests using hasse diagrams , 1997 .

[24]  P M Chapman,et al.  Presentation and interpretation of Sediment Quality Triad data , 1996, Ecotoxicology.

[25]  C. Heip,et al.  Overall summary and some conclusions from the Bremerhaven workshop. , 1992 .

[26]  G. A. Burton,et al.  Assessing the toxicity of freshwater sediments , 1991 .

[27]  A. Salski,et al.  Fuzzy clustering of existing chemicals according to their ecotoxicological properties , 1996 .

[28]  T. A. DelValls,et al.  The use of multivariate analysis to link sediment contamination and toxicity data to establish sediment quality guidelines an Example in the Gulf of Cádiz (Spain) , 1998 .

[29]  T. Braunbeck,et al.  Cytotoxicity of settling particulate matter and sediments of the Neckar River (Germany) during a winter flood , 2000 .

[30]  T. Braunbeck,et al.  Measurement of vitellogenin-mRNA expression in primary cultures of rainbow trout hepatocytes in a non-radioactive dot blot/RNAse protection-assay. , 1999, The Science of the total environment.

[31]  P. Shin,et al.  Multiple Discriminant Analysis of Marine Sediment Data , 1999 .