On the impact of deploying optical transport networks using disaggregated line systems

Based on fundamental software-defined networking principles, disaggregated solutions have recently been proposed for optical transport networks. The first solution of such type takes the form of disaggregated line systems, which allow network operators to build networks using add/drop multiplexers from multiple vendors. In addition, these line systems allow any specification-compliant optical transponder to be freely connected, independent of their manufacturer. By removing the single-vendor dependency from line systems, traditional business models, based on vertically integrated solutions, are challenged and need to be rethought. Furthermore, competition between vendors is expected to increase, leading to higher innovation and differentiation. However, the development of interoperable line systems sharing a common set of specifications and capabilities may only be able to deliver suboptimal optical transmission performances when compared with proprietary solutions where line systems are fine-tuned. Hence, this paper evaluates the routing performance between disaggregated and proprietary optical line systems. Network simulations are carried out considering two different topologies with single- and multidomain proprietary deployments. The results obtained show that while proprietary line systems keep the capability of achieving the best optical performance, disaggregated solutions cannot be ignored since they have the potential to reduce the optical-electrical-optical interface count with respect to multivendor deployments while still guaranteeing minimal demand blocking.

[1]  Joao Santos On the impact of deploying federated SDN controllers in optical transport networks , 2016, 2016 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC).

[2]  Ratul Mahajan,et al.  Elastic Optical Networking in the Microsoft Cloud , 2016 .

[3]  Miquel Garrich,et al.  SDN-enabled EDFA gain adjustment cognitive methodology for dynamic optical networks , 2015, 2015 European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC).

[4]  Ratul Mahajan,et al.  Elastic optical networking in the microsoft cloud [Invited] , 2016, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[5]  R. Cigliutti,et al.  The LOGON strategy for low-complexity control plane implementation in new-generation flexible networks , 2013, 2013 Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exposition and the National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference (OFC/NFOEC).

[6]  Daniel Müllner,et al.  Modern hierarchical, agglomerative clustering algorithms , 2011, ArXiv.

[7]  João Pedro,et al.  Cost-effectiveness assessment of transport networks based on disaggregated optical platforms , 2017, 2017 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC).

[8]  S. J. B. Yoo,et al.  OpenFlow-assisted online defragmentation in single-/multi-domain software-defined elastic optical networks [invited] , 2015, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[9]  Maxim Kuschnerov,et al.  Networking aspects for next-generation elastic optical interfaces , 2016, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[10]  Meral Shirazipour,et al.  Realizing packet-optical integration with SDN and OpenFlow 1.1 extensions , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[11]  P. Poggiolini The GN Model of Non-Linear Propagation in Uncompensated Coherent Optical Systems , 2012, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[12]  Marc Bohn,et al.  Vendor-interoperable elastic optical interfaces: Standards, experiments, and challenges [Invited] , 2015, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[13]  Juan P. Fernández Palacios,et al.  Demonstration of SDN orchestration in optical multi-vendor scenarios , 2015, 2015 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC).

[14]  Nabil Bitar,et al.  Extending software defined network principles to include optical transport , 2013, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[15]  H. Wu,et al.  Multi-layer SDN on a commercial network control platform for packet optical networks , 2014, OFC 2014.