Robotics applications grounded in learning theories on tertiary education: A systematic review

Abstract Empirical evidence suggests the effectiveness of robotics as a learning complementary tool in tertiary education. In this context, some experiences benefited from the link between educational practice and theory. However, a comprehensive survey on initiatives that explores this link in universities and colleges is missing. This work systematically reviews quantitatively assessed robots applications, grounded in learning theories, in tertiary institutions. By applying a protocol review in different bibliographic databases, 15 papers were selected for synthesis. As a result, experiences developing non-robotic concepts and skills in universities and colleges were found. In most of the cases, Computer Science and Engineering undergraduate courses were involved. In addition, empirical results reported by the selected publications suggest that some literature proposals can be useful in practice. Based on the panorama obtained, this work also points out future directions for practitioners and researchers in education.

[1]  Emanuele Menegatti,et al.  Robots in education: New trends and challenges from the Japanese market , 2013 .

[2]  Min Jou,et al.  CREATING INTERACTIVE WEB-BASED ENVIRONMENTS TO SCAFFOLD CREATIVE REASONING AND MEANINGFUL LEARNING: FROM PHYSICS TO PRODUCTS , 2010 .

[3]  Elva J. Jones,et al.  Using Robotics to Achieve Meaningfully Engaged Learning , 2011 .

[4]  I. Gaudiello,et al.  La robotique éducationnelle : état des lieux et perspectives , 2013 .

[5]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  LEGO® Therapy and the Social Use of Language Programme: An Evaluation of Two Social Skills Interventions for Children with High Functioning Autism and Asperger Syndrome , 2008, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[6]  J. Nelson,et al.  Living WITH the Lab - a freshman curriculum to boost hands-on learning, student confidence and innovation , 2008, 2008 38th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference.

[7]  K. Patricia Cross,et al.  Collaborative Learning Techniques: A Handbook for College Faculty , 2004 .

[8]  Emanuele Menegatti,et al.  Representative examples of implementing educational robotics in school based on the constructivist appr oach , 2008 .

[9]  Fernando Torres Medina,et al.  Hands-on experiences of undergraduate students in Automatics and Robotics using a virtual and remote laboratory , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[10]  Tobias Meisen,et al.  Enhancing the Learning Success of Engineering Students by Virtual Experiments , 2015, HCI.

[11]  Til Aach,et al.  MATLAB Meets LEGO Mindstorms—A Freshman Introduction Course Into Practical Engineering , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[12]  T. Greenhalgh How to Read a Paper: The Basics of Evidence-Based Medicine , 1997 .

[13]  Robertas Damasevicius,et al.  Educational Robots for Internet-of-Things Supported Collaborative Learning , 2014, ICIST.

[14]  Matthew I. Campbell Teaching Machine Design Through Product Emulation , 2002 .

[15]  Dimitris Alimisis,et al.  Educational robotics: Open questions and new challenges , 2013 .

[16]  M. Robinson,et al.  Teaching Evolution to Non-English Proficient Students by Using Lego Robotics , 2007 .

[17]  María José Rodriguez-Conde,et al.  Using Robotics as a Learning Tool in Latin America and Spain , 2014, IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje.

[18]  Paula Gomes Mian,et al.  Systematic Review in Software Engineering , 2005 .

[19]  Mohamed Hamada,et al.  A Learning System for a Computational Science Related Topic , 2012, ICCS.

[20]  Catherine J. Stevens,et al.  A review of the applicability of robots in education , 2013 .

[21]  Francesco Mondada,et al.  IniRobot : a pedagogical kit to initiate children to concepts of robotics and computer science , 2015 .

[22]  Stanislav Kurkovsky,et al.  Interdisciplinary connections in a mobile computing and robotics course , 2014, ITiCSE '14.

[23]  Guilherme Horta Travassos,et al.  A systematic review of cross- vs. within- company cost estimation studies , 2006 .

[24]  Hironobu Fujiyoshi,et al.  A framework for designing and improving learning environments fostering creativity , 2007 .

[25]  D. Garrison,et al.  Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education , 2004, Internet High. Educ..

[26]  Attila Pásztor,et al.  Effects of using model robots in the education of programming , 2010, Informatics Educ..

[27]  Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al.  Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning , 1991 .

[28]  Kenji Sakata,et al.  Robotics: a Case Study of Contextualization in Engineering Education , 2011 .

[29]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  New Pathways into Robotics: Strategies for Broadening Participation , 2008 .

[30]  Seymour Papert,et al.  Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas , 1981 .

[31]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide , 2005 .

[32]  Jörgen Lindh,et al.  Does lego training stimulate pupils' ability to solve logical problems? , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[33]  R. Hanneman Introduction to Social Network Methods , 2001 .

[34]  Pearl Brereton,et al.  Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain , 2007, J. Syst. Softw..

[35]  Miguel Nussbaum,et al.  An autonomous educational mobile robot mediator , 2008, Auton. Robots.

[36]  Bruce Lincoln,et al.  Constructivism, Technology, and the Future of Classroom Learning , 1992 .

[37]  Marsette Vona,et al.  Teaching Robotics Software With the Open Hardware Mobile Manipulator , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[38]  M. Aken,et al.  The causal ordering of academic achievement and self-concept of ability during elementary school: A longitudinal study , 1995 .

[39]  Ghazi Shukur,et al.  The Effect of LEGO Training on Pupils' School Performance in Mathematics, Problem Solving Ability and Attitude: Swedish Data , 2006, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[40]  J. Johnson,et al.  Children, robotics, and education , 2003, Artificial Life and Robotics.

[41]  Sabariah Sharif,et al.  A Review on Educational Robotics as Assistive Tools For Learning Mathematics and Science , 2014 .

[42]  L. Cronbach Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[43]  Mehmet Sahin,et al.  The impact of problem-based learning on engineering students’ beliefs about physics and conceptual understanding of energy and momentum , 2010 .

[44]  Jerry B. Weinberg,et al.  From Grade School to Grad School: An Integrated STEM Pipeline Model through Robotics , 2012 .

[45]  William M. K. Trochim,et al.  Research methods knowledge base , 2001 .

[46]  Fabiane Barreto Vavassori Benitti,et al.  Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[47]  Monica McGill,et al.  Learning to Program with Personal Robots: Influences on Student Motivation , 2012, TOCE.

[48]  R. Cedazo,et al.  The Montegancedo astronomical observatory: The first free remote observatory for learning astronomy , 2010, IEEE EDUCON 2010 Conference.