Perceptual attenuation of nonfocused auditory streams

The aim of this study was to measure the perceptual attenuation, measured in decibels, resulting from the focusing of attention on one stream within a multistream auditory sequence. The intensity of a nonfocused stream was increased until the accuracy of detecting a temporal irregularity in this stream was the same as in a focused stream. Eight subjects were required to detect a temporal irregularity created by delaying or advancing one tone which could be situated in one of three temporally regular streams played simultaneously to create a multistream sequence. The three streams differed in tempo and frequency. Subjects’ attention was focused on one of the streams by preceding the multistream sequence with one of the single streams (a cue). We first established the size of temporal irregularity detected at a 90% level in cued streams, confirming that subjects were able to focus on one particular stream. Second, an irregularity of this size was not detected above chance level in noncued streams, demonstrating that listeners focus only on the cued stream. Third, for 5 subjects, a 15-dB increase in the level of one of the noncued streams was necessary to bring detection up to that found in the cued streams. This gain provides an equivalent measure of the perceptual attenuation of nonfocused streams. For 3 other subjects, detection in the noncued stream remained at chance performance whatever the level. For all subjects, detection in the cued stream decreased slightly as the level of the noncued stream increased. We conclude that the attenuation of nonfocused auditory streams can attain as much as 15 dB, at least for some subjects.

[1]  W. Dowling,et al.  Aiming attention in pitch and time in the perception of interleaved melodies , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  W. Larkin,et al.  Frequency-response characteristic of auditory observers detecting signals of a single frequency in noise: the probe-signal method. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  M. R. Jones,et al.  Time, our lost dimension: toward a new theory of perception, attention, and memory. , 1976, Psychological review.

[5]  E. Hafter,et al.  Listening bandwidths and frequency uncertainty in pure-tone signal detection. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  B. Scharf,et al.  Deceptive Psychophysics: The Probe-Signal Method and Focused Attention , 1989 .

[7]  Stephen McAdams,et al.  The Auditory Image: A Metaphor for Musical and Psychological Research on Auditory Organization , 1984 .

[8]  S. Buus,et al.  Effective attenuation of signals in noise under focused attention. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  A. Treisman Strategies and models of selective attention. , 1969, Psychological review.

[10]  A S Bregman,et al.  Allocating attention to frequency regions , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  L. V. Noorden Temporal coherence in the perception of tone sequences , 1975 .

[12]  Albert S. Bregman,et al.  The Auditory Scene. (Book Reviews: Auditory Scene Analysis. The Perceptual Organization of Sound.) , 1990 .

[13]  I J Hirsh,et al.  Studies in auditory timing: 2. Rhythm patterns , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  C J Darwin,et al.  Duration discrimination in a series of rhythmic events , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  I J Hirsh,et al.  Studies in auditory timing: 1. Simple patterns , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  D. M. Green,et al.  Attention bands in absolute identification , 1976 .