The evaluation of qualitative methods selection in the field of design and emotion

The aim of this paper is to aid researchers in selecting appropriate qualitative methods in order to develop and improve future studies in the field of emotional design. These include observations, think-aloud protocols, questionnaires, diaries and interviews. Based on the authors’ experiences, it is proposed that the methods under review can be successfully used for collecting data on emotional responses to evaluate user product relationships. This paper reviews the methods; discusses the suitability, advantages and challenges in relation to design and emotion studies. Furthermore, the paper outlines the potential impact of technology on the application of these methods, discusses the implications of these methods for emotion research and concludes with recommendations for future work in this area.

[1]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Emotional design , 2004, UBIQ.

[2]  Henry Been-Lirn Duh,et al.  The marketing implications of affective product design. , 2007, Applied ergonomics.

[3]  Vesna Popovic,et al.  Emotional driving experiences , 2008 .

[4]  Jennifer L Branch Investigating the Information-Seeking Processes of Adolescents: The Value of Using Think Alouds and Think Afters , 2000 .

[5]  Monique W. M. Jaspers,et al.  The think aloud method: a guide to user interface design , 2004, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[6]  Robert Gillham,et al.  Diary Studies as a Tool for Efficient Cross-Cultural Design , 2005, IWIPS.

[7]  Janice Redish,et al.  User and task analysis for interface design , 1998 .

[8]  J. Hughes,et al.  Designing with Care: Adapting Cultural Probes to Inform Design in Sensitive Settings , 2003 .

[9]  C. Robson,et al.  Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers , 1993 .

[10]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data, Rev. ed. , 1993 .

[11]  N. Bolger,et al.  Diary methods: capturing life as it is lived. , 2003, Annual review of psychology.

[12]  D. Dillman,et al.  Mail and telephone surveys , 1978 .

[13]  Maarten van Someren,et al.  The Think Aloud Method: A Practical Guide to Modelling Cognitive Processes , 1994 .

[14]  Vesna Popovic Product Evaluation Methods and their Importance in Designing Interactive Artifacts , 1999 .

[15]  Patrick W. Jordan,et al.  An Introduction to Usability , 1998 .

[16]  H. Simon,et al.  How to Study Thinking in Everyday Life: Contrasting Think-Aloud Protocols With Descriptions and Explanations of Thinking , 1998 .

[17]  John Rieman,et al.  The diary study: a workplace-oriented research tool to guide laboratory efforts , 1993, INTERCHI.

[18]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability engineering , 1997, The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook.

[19]  Craig A. Smith,et al.  Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  William W. Gaver,et al.  Design: Cultural probes , 1999, INTR.

[21]  P. Jordan Human factors for pleasure in product use. , 1998, Applied ergonomics.

[22]  Pieter Desmet,et al.  Designing Products with Added Emotional Value: Development and Appllcation of an Approach for Research through Design , 2001 .

[23]  James A. Holstein,et al.  Handbook of Interview Research: Context and Method , 2001 .

[24]  Stephan Wensveen,et al.  Touch me, hit me and I know how you feel: a design approach to emotionally rich interaction , 2000, DIS '00.

[25]  Minna Isomursu,et al.  Experimental evaluation of five methods for collecting emotions in field settings with mobile applications , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[26]  Tuuli Mattelmäki,et al.  Observing and probing , 2003, DPPI '03.

[27]  James D. Hollan,et al.  A diary study of mobile information needs , 2008, CHI.

[28]  J. Russell Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. , 2003, Psychological review.

[29]  Marianella Chamorro-Koc,et al.  A methodological approach to visceral hedonic rhetoric , 2009 .

[30]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction , 2002 .