Feedback approach to design for assembly by evaluation of assembly plan

Abstract One of the questions that intrigues many researchers is that of how a product can be designed that is good for assembly. A product which is assembly-oriented is easier and less costly to assemble. The benefits are many, but the ways of achieving it are certainly not unique. One way is the concurrent-engineering/design-for-assembly approach. In this approach, all the lifecycle issues are taken into consideration during the design phase. A different but complementary approach is that of allowing redesign as soon as specific information is made available during a later stage of the lifecycle, such as the planning stage. The paper adopts the second approach. It examines how information available from the planning stage can aid in identifying areas for redesign. Evaluation criteria are formulated that provide enough information to allow redesign suggestions to be generated. The effects of these redesign suggestions are simulated on screen via suitable geometric manipulation. Suggestions that cause the failure of some existing functions of the product are discarded. When all the suggestions have been processed, the simulated resultant product is shown to the designer. This allows the designer to view the redesigned product rather than having to imagine what it looks like.

[1]  C. S. George Lee,et al.  Uncertainty manipulation and propagation and verification of applicability of actions in assembly tasks , 1991, Proceedings. 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[2]  C. S. George Lee,et al.  Manipulation and propagation of uncertainty and verification of applicability of actions in assembly tasks , 1992, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[3]  K. G. Swift,et al.  Design for assembly , 1983 .

[4]  Lode Missiaen Localized abductive planning for robot assembly , 1991, Proceedings. 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[5]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  The synthesis of manipulator control programs from task-level specifications , 1976 .

[6]  C. S. George Lee,et al.  Precedence knowledge in feature mating operation assembly planning , 1989, Proceedings, 1989 International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[7]  Sukhan Lee,et al.  Assembly planning based on subassembly extraction , 1990, Proceedings., IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[8]  Arthur C. Sanderson,et al.  Task sequence planning for robotic assembly , 1989 .

[9]  Arthur C. Sanderson,et al.  AND/OR graph representation of assembly plans , 1986, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[10]  Thomas L. DeFazio,et al.  Simplified generation of all mechanical assembly sequences , 1987, IEEE Journal on Robotics and Automation.

[11]  Jan D. Wolter On the automatic generation of assembly plans , 1989, Proceedings, 1989 International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[12]  Rodney A. Brooks,et al.  Symbolic Error Analysis and Robot Planning , 1982 .

[13]  A. Gairola Design for assembly: A challenge for expert systems , 1986, Robotics.

[14]  C. S. George Lee,et al.  A framework of knowledge-based assembly planning , 1991, Proceedings. 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[15]  Rangasami L. Kashyap,et al.  Abstractions in Object-oriented Data Models: A Formalized Representation Scheme , 1989, SEKE.

[16]  B L Miles,et al.  Design for Assembly—A Key Element within Design for Manufacture , 1989 .

[17]  Donald Ervin Knuth,et al.  The Art of Computer Programming , 1968 .