Fairness Comparisons between TCP Reno and TCP Vegas for Future Deployment of TCP Vegas
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] W. Richard Stevens,et al. TCP/IP Illustrated, Volume 1: The Protocols , 1994 .
[2] Matthew Mathis,et al. Forward acknowledgement: refining TCP congestion control , 1996, SIGCOMM 1996.
[3] Michael Perloff,et al. Improvements to TCP performance in high-speed ATM networks , 1995, CACM.
[4] Sally Floyd,et al. Simulation-based comparisons of Tahoe, Reno and SACK TCP , 1996, CCRV.
[5] Jon Crowcroft,et al. Eliminating periodic packet losses in the 4.3-Tahoe BSD TCP congestion control algorithm , 1992, CCRV.
[6] QUTdN QeO,et al. Random early detection gateways for congestion avoidance , 1993, TNET.
[7] Masayuki Murata,et al. Fairness and stability of congestion control mechanisms of TCP , 2000, Telecommun. Syst..
[8] Larry Peterson,et al. TCP Vegas: new techniques for congestion detection and avoidance , 1994, SIGCOMM 1994.
[9] Matthew Mathis,et al. Forward acknowledgement: refining TCP congestion control , 1996, SIGCOMM '96.
[10] Larry L. Peterson,et al. TCP Vegas: End to End Congestion Avoidance on a Global Internet , 1995, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..
[11] T. V. Lakshman,et al. Performance Analysis of Window-based Flow Control Using TCP/IP: Effect of High Bandwidth-Delay Products and Random Loss , 1994, High Performance Networking.
[12] Jean C. Walrand,et al. Analysis and comparison of TCP Reno and Vegas , 1999, IEEE INFOCOM '99. Conference on Computer Communications. Proceedings. Eighteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. The Future is Now (Cat. No.99CH36320).