On the Measurement and Conceptualization of Flow

This chapter introduces in chronological order the three main measurement methods–the flow questionnaire, the experience sampling method, and the standardized scales of the componential approach–that researchers developed and used in conducting research on the flow state. Each measurement method and underlying conceptualization is explained, and its strengths and limitations are then discussed in relation to the other measurement methods and associated conceptualizations. The analysis reveals that, although the concept of flow remained stable since its inception, the models of flow that researchers developed in conjunction with the measurement methods changed substantially over time. Moreover, the findings obtained by applying the various measurement methods led to corroborations and disconfirmations of the underlying models and hence provided indications on how to interpret and possibly modify flow theory. The final section outlines new directions for developing more valid and useful measurement methods that can help to advance the understanding of flow, its antecedents, and its consequences.

[1]  H. Bless,et al.  Bulletin Personality and Social Psychology Flow and Regulatory Compatibility: an Experimental Approach to the Flow Model of Intrinsic Motivation on Behalf Of: Society for Personality and Social Psychology , 2022 .

[2]  A. Delle Fave,et al.  The quality of experience in adolescents' daily lives: developmental perspectives. , 2000, Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs.

[3]  Lucia Ceja,et al.  Dynamic patterns of flow in the workplace: Characterizing within-individual variability using a complexity science approach , 2011 .

[4]  A. D. Fave,et al.  The investigation of optimal experience and apathy : developmental and psychosocial implications , 2005 .

[5]  A. D. Fave,et al.  Optimal experience: The quality of experience in the flow channels: comparison of Italian and U.S. students , 1988 .

[6]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Validity and Reliability of the Experience‐Sampling Method , 1987, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[7]  H. Goldstein Multilevel Statistical Models , 2006 .

[8]  G. Ellis,et al.  Measurement and Analysis Issues with Explanation of Variance in Daily Experience Using the Flow Model , 1994 .

[9]  A. Maslow Religions, Values, and Peak Experiences , 1965 .

[10]  Giovanni B. Moneta,et al.  The Flow Experience Across Cultures , 2004 .

[11]  Kenneth S. Pope,et al.  The Stream of Consciousness , 1978 .

[12]  G. Moneta The Flow Model of Intrinsic Motivation in Chinese: Cultural and Personal Moderators , 2004 .

[13]  J. Haworth,et al.  Challenge, skill and positive subjective states in the! daily life of a sample of YTS students , 1995 .

[14]  R. Conti,et al.  Time flies: investigating the connection between intrinsic motivation and the experience of time. , 2001, Journal of personality.

[15]  G. Privette,et al.  Peak experience, peak performance, and flow: A comparative analysis of positive human experiences. , 1983 .

[16]  H. Marsh,et al.  Development and Validation of a Scale to Measure Optimal Experience: The Flow State Scale , 1996 .

[17]  M. Csíkszentmihályi Attention and the Holistic Approach to Behavior , 2014 .

[18]  J. Schüler,et al.  Achievement incentives determine the effects of achievement-motive incongruence on flow experience , 2010 .

[19]  J. Flavell Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive-Developmental Inquiry. , 1979 .

[20]  S. Engeser,et al.  Flow, performance and moderators of challenge-skill balance , 2008 .

[21]  Giovanni B. Moneta,et al.  Construct and concurrent validity of the Positive Metacognitions and Positive Meta-Emotions Questionnaire , 2010 .

[22]  F. Massimini,et al.  The systematic assessment of flow in daily experience , 1988 .

[23]  A. Elliot,et al.  Handbook of Competence and Motivation , 2013 .

[24]  Regina Vollmeyer,et al.  Flow bei der Arbeit, doch Glück in der Freizeit , 2007 .

[25]  J. W. Atkinson Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. , 1957, Psychological review.

[26]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  The monitoring of optimal experience. A tool for psychiatric rehabilitation. , 1987 .

[27]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Optimal experience in work and leisure. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Experience Sampling Method: Measuring the Quality of Everyday Life , 2006 .

[29]  Clifford J. Mallett,et al.  The Flow State Scale-2 and Dispositional Flow Scale-2: Examination of factorial validity and reliability for Japanese adults , 2008 .

[30]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  The experience of psychopathology: Investigating mental disorders in their natural settings. , 1992 .

[31]  Giovanni B. Moneta,et al.  Flow in Work as a Function of Trait Intrinsic Motivation, Opportunity for Creativity in the Job, and Work Engagement , 2010 .

[32]  R. Larson,et al.  The Experience of Psychopathology: Analyzing Experience Sampling data: a guide book for the perplexed , 1992 .

[33]  Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi,et al.  Models of Concentration in Natural Environments: A Comparative Approach Based on Streams of Experiential Data , 1999 .

[34]  M. Csíkszentmihályi Finding Flow: The Psychology of Engagement with Everyday Life , 1997 .

[35]  D. Kahneman,et al.  A Survey Method for Characterizing Daily Life Experience: The Day Reconstruction Method , 2004, Science.

[36]  M. Csíkszentmihályi Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience , 1990 .

[37]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  The effect of perceived challenges and skills on the quality of subjective experience. , 1996, Journal of personality.

[38]  S. West,et al.  The investigation of personality structure: Statistical models , 1997 .

[39]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. , 1988 .

[40]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  The ecology of adolescent activity and experience , 1977, Journal of youth and adolescence.

[41]  Andrew D. Lawrence,et al.  Individual Differences in the Modulation of Fear-Related Brain Activation by Attentional Control , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[42]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Flow in sports: The keys to optimal experiences and performances. , 1999 .

[43]  K. Asakawa Flow Experience and Autotelic Personality in Japanese College Students: How do they Experience Challenges in Daily Life? , 2004 .

[44]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[45]  Joel M. Hektner,et al.  Experience sampling method , 2007 .

[46]  Simon L. Albrecht,et al.  Handbook of Employee Engagement: Perspectives, Issues, Research and Practice , 2012 .

[47]  R. Eklund,et al.  Assessing Flow in Physical Activity: The Flow State Scale-2 and Dispositional Flow Scale-2 , 2002 .