Attention-Situation Awareness (A-SA) Model of Pilot Error

We describe three applications of an attention-situation awareness model to predicting pilot performance in high fidelity flight simulations. The model incorporates the SEEV model of selective attention, in which eye movements are driven by salience, expectancy and value, and are inhibited by the effort required to move the eyes over longer distance and of concurrent tasks. In application 1, we predict the taxi-way errors made in a simulation in which commercial airline pilots navigate the airport surface at Chicago O'Hare airport. In application 2, we predict the scanning behavior of three commercial pilots flying a simulated approach to Santa Barbara Airport, using a synthetic vision system display, and responding to occasional unexpected events. In application 3, we predict scanning behavior and performance of 8 general aviation pilots flying a simulated landing approach to a terrain challenged airport. Various forms of the computational model are evaluated to predict scanning performance, off-normal event detection and, in application 3, multi-task performance of flight path control and traffic detection. The model is shown to be quite valid, accounting for around 85% of the variance in scanning across different areas of interest in the pilots' visual field. The model fit is not improved by including the effort-inhibition parameter. The degree to which pilots conform to the expected value (optimal) version of the model is shown to positively predict the indices of multi-task performance. The role of redundancy is also addressed.

[1]  M R Endsley,et al.  Sources of situation awareness errors in aviation. , 1996, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[2]  Nadine B. Sarter,et al.  Team Play with a Powerful and Independent Agent: A Full-Mission Simulation Study , 2000, Hum. Factors.

[3]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Workload and Reliability of Predictor Displays in Aircraft Traffic Avoidance , 2000 .

[4]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Pilot Task Management : Testing an Attentional Expected Value Model of Visual Scanning , 2001 .

[5]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1984 .

[6]  R L Klatzky When to inspect? Recurrent inspection decisions in a simulated risky environment. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[7]  C D Wickens,et al.  Compatibility and Resource Competition between Modalities of Input, Central Processing, and Output , 1983, Human factors.

[8]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior , 1959 .

[9]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  Nadine B. Sarter,et al.  Good Vibrations: Tactile Feedback in Support of Attention Allocation and Human-Automation Coordination in Event-Driven Domains , 1999, Hum. Factors.

[11]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Traffic and Flight Guidance Depiction on a Synthetic Vision System Display: The Effects of Clutter on Performance and Visual Attention Allocation , 2004 .

[12]  C D Wickens,et al.  Codes and Modalities in Multiple Resources: A Success and a Qualification , 1988, Human factors.

[13]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Attention-Situation Awareness (A-SA) Model , 2003 .

[14]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Synthetic Vision Systems: The Effects of Guidance Symbology, Display Size, and Field of View , 2005, Hum. Factors.

[15]  C. Wickens,et al.  Visual scanning and pilot expertise: the role of attentional flexibility and mental model development. , 1997, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[16]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Eye-tracking and Individual Differences in off-Normal Event Detection when Flying with a Synthetic Vision System Display , 2004 .

[17]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Monitoring Behavior and Supervisory Control , 1976 .

[18]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Pilot Maneuver Choice and Workload in Free Flight , 2002, Hum. Factors.

[19]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Situation Awareness and Workload in Aviation , 2002 .

[20]  C. Bundesen A theory of visual attention. , 1990, Psychological review.

[21]  Daniel J. Garland,et al.  Situation Awareness Analysis and Measurement , 2009 .

[22]  Nadine B. Sarter,et al.  How in the World Did We Ever Get into That Mode? Mode Error and Awareness in Supervisory Control , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[23]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  ATTENTIONAL TUNNELING AND TASK MANAGEMENT , 2005 .

[24]  David Woods,et al.  Behind human error : cognitive systems, computers, and hindsight : state-of-the-art report , 1994 .

[25]  Becky L. Hooey,et al.  Characterizing Visual Performance During Approach and Landing With and Without a Synthetic Vision Display: A Part Task Study , 2003 .

[26]  Scott A. Shappell,et al.  Human Factors Analysis of Postaccident Data: Applying Theoretical Taxonomies of Human Error , 1997 .

[27]  Jaime R. Carbonell,et al.  A Queueing Model of Visual Sampling Experimental Validation , 1968 .

[28]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Handbook of perception and human performance , 1986 .

[29]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  The Structure of Attentional Resources , 1980 .

[30]  Becky L. Hooey,et al.  A Post-Hoc Analysis of Navigation Errors During Surface Operations: Identification of Contributing Factors and Mitigating Solutions , 2002 .

[31]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[32]  L. R. Peterson,et al.  Short-term retention of individual verbal items. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[33]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Modeling of Situation Awareness Supported by Advanced Flight Deck Displays , 2007 .

[34]  Neville Moray,et al.  Monitoring behavior and supervisory control , 1986 .

[35]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Long-term working memory. , 1995, Psychological review.

[36]  Marilyn Jager Adams,et al.  Situation Awareness and the Cognitive Management of Complex Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[37]  Becky L. Hooey,et al.  Pilot Navigation Errors on the Airport Surface: Identifying Contributing Factors and Mitigating Solutions , 2006 .

[38]  Jarvis J. Arthur,et al.  The Efficacy of Head-Down and Head-Up Synthetic Vision Display Concepts for Retro- and Forward-Fit of Commercial Aircraft , 2004 .

[39]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Attentional Models of Multitask Pilot Performance Using Advanced Display Technology , 2003, Hum. Factors.

[40]  D. Norman Categorization of action slips. , 1981 .

[41]  J. Shaoul Human Error , 1973, Nature.

[42]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[43]  William J Horrey,et al.  Modeling drivers' visual attention allocation while interacting with in-vehicle technologies. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[44]  Becky L. Hooey,et al.  IMPROVING EVALUATION AND SYSTEM DESIGN THROUGH THE USE OF OFF-NOMINAL TESTING: A METHODOLOGY FOR SCENARIO DEVELOPMENT , 2003 .