Deep-tissue multiphoton fluorescence lifetime microscopy for intravital imaging of protein-protein interactions

Fluorescent lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) has proven to be a valuable tool in beating the Rayleigh criterion for light microscopy by measuring Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) between two fluorophores. Applying multiphoton FLIM, we previously showed in a human breast cancer cell line that recycling of a membrane receptorgreen fluorescent protein fusion is enhanced concomitantly with the formation of a receptor:protein kinase C α complex in the endosomal compartment. We have extended this established technique to probe direct protein-protein interactions also in vivo. Therefore, we used various expressible fluorescent tags fused to membrane receptor molecules in order to generate stable two-colour breast carcinoma cell lines via controlled retroviral infection. We used these cell lines for establishing a xenograft tumour model in immune-compromised Nude mice. Using this animal model in conjunction with scanning Ti:Sapphire laser-based two-photon excitation, we established deep-tissue multiphoton FLIM in vivo. For the first time, this novel technique enables us to directly assess donor fluorescence lifetime changes in vivo and we show the application of this method for intravital imaging of direct protein-protein interactions.

[1]  S. Ameer-Beg,et al.  Multiphoton time-domain fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy: practical application to protein–protein interactions using global analysis , 2009, Journal of the Royal Society Interface.

[2]  Borivoj Vojnovic,et al.  Global and pixel kinetic data analysis for FRET detection by multi-photon time-domain FLIM , 2005, SPIE BiOS.

[3]  Borivoj Vojnovic,et al.  Spatially Distinct Binding of Cdc42 to PAK1 and N-WASP in Breast Carcinoma Cells , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[4]  Borivoj Vojnovic,et al.  Dynamic imaging of protein-protein interactions by MP-FLIM , 2005, SPIE BiOS.

[5]  Peter J. Parker,et al.  Imaging Protein Kinase Cα Activation in Cells , 1999 .

[6]  W. Rostène,et al.  Chemokine Action in the Nervous System , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  C. Broder,et al.  Marked structural and functional heterogeneity in CXCR4: Separation of HIV‐1 and SDF‐1α responses , 2005, Immunology and cell biology.

[8]  E. Sahai,et al.  Imaging amoeboid cancer cell motility in vivo , 2008, Journal of microscopy.

[9]  R. B. Campbell,et al.  In vivo measurement of gene expression, angiogenesis and physiological function in tumors using multiphoton laser scanning microscopy , 2001, Nature Medicine.

[10]  D. Kleinfeld,et al.  Fluctuations and stimulus-induced changes in blood flow observed in individual capillaries in layers 2 through 4 of rat neocortex. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Borivoj Vojnovic,et al.  Application of multiphoton steady state and lifetime imaging to mapping of tumor vascular architecture in vivo , 2002, SPIE BiOS.

[12]  Borivoj Vojnovic,et al.  Intravital imaging of tumour vascular networks using multi-photon fluorescence microscopy. , 2005, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[13]  John White,et al.  Long-term two-photon fluorescence imaging of mammalian embryos without compromising viability , 1999, Nature Biotechnology.

[14]  Joachim Goedhart,et al.  Bright monomeric red fluorescent protein with an extended fluorescence lifetime , 2007, Nature Methods.

[15]  G. Nicolson.  Differential organ tissue adhesion, invasion, and growth properties of metastatic rat mammary adenocarcinoma cells , 1988, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[16]  B. Vojnovic,et al.  Multiphoton-FLIM quantification of the EGFP-mRFP1 FRET pair for localization of membrane receptor-kinase interactions. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[17]  Borivoj Vojnovic,et al.  Imaging protein-protein interactions by multiphoton FLIM , 2003, European Conference on Biomedical Optics.

[18]  W. Webb,et al.  Three‐dimensionally resolved NAD(P)H cellular metabolic redox imaging of the in situ cornea with two‐photon excitation laser scanning microscopy , 1995, Journal of microscopy.

[19]  F. Balkwill.  The significance of cancer cell expression of the chemokine receptor CXCR4. , 2004, Seminars in cancer biology.

[20]  W. Webb,et al.  Quantitative comparison of background rejection, signal-to-noise ratio, and resolution in confocal and full-field laser scanning microscopes. , 1995, Applied optics.

[21]  Erik Sahai,et al.  Illuminating the metastatic process , 2007, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[22]  Brian Seed,et al.  Dynamic imaging of collagen and its modulation in tumors in vivo using second-harmonic generation , 2003, Nature Medicine.

[23]  N. Ramanujam,et al.  In vivo multiphoton microscopy of NADH and FAD redox states, fluorescence lifetimes, and cellular morphology in precancerous epithelia , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  D. Piwnica-Worms,et al.  CXCR4 Regulates Growth of Both Primary and Metastatic Breast Cancer , 2004, Cancer Research.

[25]  K. Kedzierska,et al.  The influence of cytokines, chemokines and their receptors on HIV‐1 replication in monocytes and macrophages , 2003, Reviews in medical virology.

[26]  P. So,et al.  Title Optical biopsy of in vivo human skin : Multiphoton excitation microscopy , 1998 .

[27]  K. Svoboda,et al.  Photon Upmanship: Why Multiphoton Imaging Is More than a Gimmick , 1997, Neuron.

[28]  M. Ratajczak,et al.  Trafficking of Normal Stem Cells and Metastasis of Cancer Stem Cells Involve Similar Mechanisms: Pivotal Role of the SDF‐1–CXCR4 Axis , 2005, Stem cells.

[29]  Jens Eickhoff,et al.  In vivo multiphoton fluorescence lifetime imaging of protein-bound and free nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide in normal and precancerous epithelia. , 2007, Journal of biomedical optics.

[30]  George Diaz.  CXCR4 mutations in WHIM syndrome: a misguided immune system? , 2005, Immunological reviews.