KNOWLEDGE OF NONVERBAL CUES, GENDER, AND NONVERBAL DECODING ACCURACY

ABSTRACT:The Test of Nonverbal Cue Knowledge (TONCK), a paper and pencil test measuring explicit knowledge of nonverbal cue meanings and uses, was developed and found to be reliable and to have predictive ability. In four studies, participants were given the TONCK and one or more tests of accuracy in decoding nonverbal cues the adult faces and voices tests of the Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Accuracy 2 (DANVA) and the video and audio tests of the Profile of Nonverbal Sensitivity (PONS), as well as a test of general cognitive ability (the Wonderlic Personnel Test). Results are reported for the four studies individually and also in a meta-analytic summary. Females scored higher than males on the TONCK and on the PONS, and the TONCK predicted accuracy on the PONS and DANVA. Knowledge of nonverbal cues did not account for the gender difference in decoding ability on the PONS. Cognitive ability was related to the TONCK but did not compromise relations with other variables. The future utility of the TONCK, content specificity of tests, as well as the automaticity of judging cues are discussed.

[1]  S. Shields,et al.  Gender and Emotion , 2006 .

[2]  L. F. Barrett,et al.  Handbook of Emotions , 1993 .

[3]  Judith A. Hall.  Nonverbal sex differences : communication accuracy and expressive style , 1984 .

[4]  A. Fischer.  Gender and emotion: Social psychological perspectives , 2000 .

[5]  Judith A. Hall.  Gender Effects in Decoding Nonverbal Cues , 1978 .

[6]  Sara D. Hodges,et al.  Gender Differences, Motivation, and Empathic Accuracy: When it Pays to Understand , 2001 .

[7]  Judith A. Hall,et al.  Beliefs about female and male nonverbal communication , 1995 .

[8]  S. Nowicki,et al.  Individual differences in the nonverbal communication of affect: The diagnostic analysis of nonverbal accuracy scale , 1994 .

[9]  R. E. Walker,et al.  Social Intelligence: Its History and Measurement , 1973 .

[10]  Patricia Noller,et al.  Sex differences in nonverbal communication: Advantage lost or supremacy regained? , 1986 .

[11]  R. Gibson,et al.  What the Face Reveals , 2002 .

[12]  Frank J. Bernieri,et al.  Interpersonal Sensitivity : Theory and Measurement , 2001 .

[13]  Frank J. Bernieri,et al.  Coordinated movement and rapport in teacher-student interactions , 1988 .

[14]  R. Rosenthal.  Sensitivity to Nonverbal Communication: The PONS Test , 1979 .

[15]  W. Ickes,et al.  Gender differences in empathic accuracy: Differential ability or differential motivation? , 2000 .

[16]  R. Rosenthal.  Meta-analytic procedures for social research , 1984 .

[17]  M. Knapp,et al.  Nonverbal communication in human interaction , 1972 .

[18]  Frank J. Bernieri,et al.  Toward a histology of social behavior: Judgmental accuracy from thin slices of the behavioral stream , 2000 .

[19]  Judith A. Hall,et al.  Gender differences in nonverbal communication of emotion , 2000 .

[20]  R. Riggio,et al.  Self-Report Measurement of Interpersonal Sensitivity , 2001 .

[21]  Jeroen Jansz,et al.  Masculine identity and restrictive emotionality. , 2000 .

[22]  S. McKelvie.  The Wonderlic Personnel Test: Reliability and Validity in an Academic Setting , 1989 .

[23]  J. Burgoon,et al.  Nonverbal Communication: The Unspoken Dialogue , 1988 .

[24]  Frank J. Bernieri,et al.  Nonverbal Receptivity: The Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Accuracy (DANVA) , 2001 .

[25]  Gün R. Semin,et al.  Lie experts' beliefs about nonverbal indicators of deception , 1996 .

[26]  S. Nowicki,et al.  Perception of Emotion: Measuring Decoding Accuracy of Adult Prosodic Cues Varying in Intensity , 1998 .