Trading at prices above the fundamental value of an asset, i.e. a bubble, has been verified and replicated in laboratory asset markets for the past seven years. To date, only common group experience provides minimal conditions for common investor sentiment and trading at fundamental value. Rational expectations models do not predict the bubble and crash phenomena found in these experimental markets; such models yield only equilibrium predictions and do not articulate a dynamic process that converges to fundamental value with experience. The dynamic models proposed by Caginalp et al. do an excellent job of predicting price patterns after calibration with a previous experimental bubble, given the initial conditions for a new bubble and its controlled fundamental value. Several extensions of this basic laboratory asset market have recently been undertaken which allow for margin buying, short selling, futures contracting, limit price change rules and a host of other changes that could effect price formation in these assets markets. This paper reviews the results of 72 laboratory asset market experiments which include experimental treatments for dampening bubbles that are suggested by rational expectations theory or popular policy prescriptions.
[1]
V. Smith,et al.
Bubbles, Crashes, and Endogenous Expectations in Experimental Spot Asset Markets
,
1988
.
[2]
G. Ermentrout,et al.
A Kinetic Thermodynamics Approach to the Psychology of Fluctuations in Financial Markets
,
1990
.
[3]
R. Thaler,et al.
Investor Sentiment and the Closed-End Fund Puzzle
,
1990
.
[4]
Richard H. Day,et al.
Bulls, bears and market sheep
,
1990
.
[5]
G. Ermentrout,et al.
Numerical studies of differential equations related to theoretical financial markets
,
1991
.
[6]
Ronald R. King,et al.
The Robustness of Bubbles and Crashes in Experimental Stock Markets
,
1993
.
[7]
V. Smith,et al.
Futures Contracting and Dividend Uncertainty in Experimental Asset Markets
,
1995
.