A dimensional model for describing and differentiating project teams

Abstract Most of the existing studies focus on using taxonomic structures to define different project team types; however, little consensus has been reached on the classification. This paper holds that greater consensus could be achieved by using a dimensional scaling approach to describe project teams. Based on the last 35 years of project team research, a conceptual model is presented for describing and differentiating project teams according to seven dimensions: skill differentiation, interdependence, authority differentiation, team size, team longevity, virtuality, and sharedness. In addition, we illustrate the interrelationships among the dimensions. By using this model, we further explain how the 18 types of project teams discussed in the literature could be more effectively presented. Implications of the model as well as its limitations and possible future research directions are also explored.

[1]  Irem Dikmen,et al.  Capturing Knowledge in Construction Projects: Knowledge Platform for Contractors , 2008 .

[2]  Daan van Knippenberg,et al.  Teams in Pursuit of Radical Innovation: A Goal Orientation Perspective , 2014 .

[3]  William H. Glick,et al.  Typologies As a Unique Form Of Theory Building: Toward Improved Understanding and Modeling , 1994 .

[4]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  A Typology of Virtual Teams , 2002 .

[5]  Babak Memarian,et al.  Team Processes and Safety of Workers: Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Processes of Construction Crews , 2012 .

[6]  Gonzalo Lizarralde,et al.  Sustainable Development in the Building Sector: A Canadian Case Study on the Alignment of Strategic and Tactical Management , 2012 .

[7]  Justin Weidman,et al.  Effects of CM/GC Project Delivery on Managing Process Risk in Transportation Construction , 2016 .

[8]  R. Keller,et al.  Cross-Functional Project Groups in Research and New Product Development: Diversity, Communications, Job Stress, and Outcomes , 2001 .

[9]  David R. Riley,et al.  Piloting Evaluation Metrics for Sustainable High-Performance Building Project Delivery , 2010 .

[10]  George B. Graen,et al.  Self-Management and Team-Making in Cross-Functional Work Teams: Discovering the Keys to Becoming an Integrated Team , 1992 .

[11]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  The Dimensions and Antecedents of Team Virtuality , 2005 .

[12]  Andrew R.J. Dainty,et al.  The extent of team integration within construction projects , 2006 .

[13]  Claus W. Langfred.  Too Much of a Good Thing? Negative Effects of High Trust and Individual Autonomy in Self-Managing Teams , 2004 .

[14]  Ofer Zwikael,et al.  What impacts the performance of large-scale government projects? , 2016 .

[15]  Liz Lee-Kelley,et al.  Locus of control and attitudes to working in virtual teams , 2006 .

[16]  Hamzah Abdul-Rahman,et al.  Knowledge Utilization Process in Highway Construction Projects , 2016 .

[17]  John R. Hollenbeck,et al.  Beyond Team Types and Taxonomies: A Dimensional Scaling Conceptualization for Team Description , 2012 .

[18]  A. Majchrzak,et al.  Leading Virtual Teams , 2007 .

[19]  L. Dyer,et al.  Right from the Start: Exploring the Effects of Early Team Events on Subsequent Project Team Development and Performance , 2004 .

[20]  J. C. Henderson,et al.  Managing I/S Design Teams: A Control Theories Perspective , 1992 .

[21]  Weng Tat Chan,et al.  Interface Management for China’s Build – Operate – Transfer Projects , 2005 .

[22]  Chris Procter,et al.  Florence Duomo project (1420–1436): Learning best project management practice from history , 2014 .

[23]  Paul Blessner,et al.  Self-Organization and Sense-Making in Architect–Engineer Design Teams: Leveraging Health Care’s Approach to Managing Complex Adaptive Systems , 2016 .

[24]  Amjad El-Tayeh,et al.  Using Digital Socialization to Support Geographically Dispersed AEC Project Teams , 2007 .

[25]  Martin Hoegl,et al.  Smaller teams–better teamwork: How to keep project teams small , 2005 .

[26]  Avan R. Jassawalla,et al.  Building collaborative cross-functional new product teams , 1999 .

[27]  Hamzah Abdul-Rahman,et al.  Applying Risk Management Workshop for a Public Construction Project: Case Study , 2013 .

[28]  Willow A. Sheremata.  Centrifugal and Centripetal Forces in Radical New Product Development Under Time Pressure , 2000 .

[29]  David Grau,et al.  Benefits of On-Site Design to Project Performance Measures , 2012 .

[30]  Charles M. Slem,et al.  Team work in research and development organizations: The characteristics of successful teams , 1995 .

[31]  R. Wageman.  Interdependence and Group Effectiveness , 1995 .

[32]  Sy-Jye Guo,et al.  Owner-Controlled Insurance Program and Construction Project Management for Taiwan High Speed Rail Project , 2010 .

[33]  Tammy L. Rapp,et al.  Something(s) old and something(s) new: Modeling drivers of global virtual team effectiveness , 2012 .

[34]  B. Rosen,et al.  Managing the life cycle of virtual teams , 2004 .

[35]  Karlos Artto,et al.  Inter-Team Coordination Patterns and Outcomes in Multi-Team Projects , 2013 .

[36]  Ingrid M. Nembhard,et al.  Product Development and Learning in Project Teams: The Challenges Are the Benefits* , 2009 .

[37]  S. G. Cohen,et al.  What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite , 1997 .

[38]  M. Tushman.  Work Characteristics and Subunit Communication Structure: A Contingency Analysis. , 1979 .

[39]  Luís Fernando Magnanini de Almeida,et al.  Can Agile Project Management be Adopted by Industries Other than Software Development? , 2014 .

[40]  David R. Riley,et al.  Lean Processes for Sustainable Project Delivery , 2006 .

[41]  Teppo Felin,et al.  Organizational routines and capabilities: Historical drift and a course-correction toward microfoundations , 2009 .

[42]  Edwin Hutchins,et al.  The technology of team navigation , 1990 .

[43]  Gerard George,et al.  Bridging the Mutual Knowledge Gap: Coordination and the Commercialization of University Science , 2013 .

[44]  L. Weingart,et al.  Representational gaps, information processing, and conflict in functionally diverse teams , 2007 .

[45]  Peter J. Byrne,et al.  Complex project management as complex problem solving: A distributed knowledge management perspective , 2014 .

[46]  Patrick S. W. Fong,et al.  Knowledge creation in multidisciplinary project teams: an empirical study of the processes and their dynamic interrelationships , 2003 .

[47]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. , 1989 .

[48]  David Bryde,et al.  The project benefits of Building Information Modelling (BIM) , 2013 .

[49]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Group Heterogeneity Increases the Risks of Large Group Size , 2013, Psychological science.

[50]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[51]  Jimmy C. Huang,et al.  Social Capital and Knowledge Integration in an ERP Project Team: The Importance of Bridging and Bonding , 2004 .

[52]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Organizational Demography: The Differential Effects of Age and Tenure Distributions on Technical Communication , 1989 .

[53]  Bryan Franz,et al.  Project Impacts of Specialty Mechanical Contractor Design Involvement in the Health Care Industry: Comparative Case Study , 2013 .

[54]  Douglas D. Gransberg,et al.  Communicating Design Quality Requirements for Public Sector Design/Build Projects , 2008 .

[55]  Yi Peng,et al.  Demystifying Construction Project Time-Effort Distribution Curves: BIM and Non-BIM Comparison , 2015 .

[56]  Douglas D. Gransberg,et al.  Project Complexity Mapping in Five Dimensions for Complex Transportation Projects , 2013 .

[57]  Gwendolyn E. Campbell,et al.  Measuring teamwork mental models to support training needs assessment, development, and evaluation: two empirical studies† , 2001 .

[58]  Kathy Brittain White,et al.  Information Systems Development Success: Perspectives from Project Team Participants , 1986, MIS Q..

[59]  Yong-Woo Kim,et al.  Integration Evaluation Framework for Integrated Design Teams of Green Buildings: Development and Validation , 2016 .

[60]  H. Greve,et al.  Superman or the Fantastic Four? Knowledge Combination and Experience in Innovative Teams , 2006 .

[61]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Bridging the Boundary: External Activity and Performance in Organizational Teams. , 1992 .

[62]  S. Wilkinson,et al.  Effects of project governance structures on the management of risks in major infrastructure projects: A comparative analysis , 2014 .

[63]  Iris D. Tommelein,et al.  Design of an Infrastructure Project Using a Point-Based Methodology , 2012 .

[64]  Blake Ives,et al.  Virtual teams: a review of current literature and directions for future research , 2004, DATB.

[65]  Peter A. Bamberger,et al.  Can Surgical Teams Ever Learn? The Role of Coordination, Complexity, and Transitivity in Action Team Learning , 2013 .

[66]  Xianbo Zhao,et al.  Applying a Fuzzy Consensus Scheme to Enhance the Group Decision Making of a Building Envelope Design Team , 2016 .

[67]  Le Chen,et al.  Validation of an Instrument to Measure Governance and Performance on Collaborative Infrastructure Projects , 2014 .

[68]  Peihua Zhang,et al.  Explaining Knowledge-Sharing Intention in Construction Teams in Hong Kong , 2013 .

[69]  Martine R. Haas,et al.  Acquiring and Applying Knowledge in Transnational Teams: The Roles of Cosmopolitans and Locals , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[70]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999 .

[71]  Tammy L. Rapp,et al.  Team Effectiveness 1997-2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse Into the Future , 2008 .

[72]  John E. Taylor,et al.  Emergence and Role of Cultural Boundary Spanners in Global Engineering Project Networks , 2010 .

[73]  Lois Peters,et al.  Managing Interdisciplinary, Longitudinal Research Teams: Extending Grounded Theory-Building Methodologies , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[74]  Awad S. Hanna,et al.  Quantitative Methods for Design-Build Team Selection , 2009 .

[75]  François Chiocchio,et al.  Cohesion and Performance , 2009 .

[76]  Andrew Davies,et al.  Project Complexity and Systems Integration: Constructing the London 2012 Olympics and Paralympics Games , 2014 .

[77]  Daniel Castro-Lacouture,et al.  Unified Framework for Construction Project Integration , 2016 .

[78]  Cathy van Dyck,et al.  Project risk as identity threat: explaining the development and consequences of risk discourse in an infrastructure project , 2015 .

[79]  Walter O. Einstein,et al.  Strategic performance appraisal in team-based organizations: One size does not fit all , 2001 .

[80]  Vittal S. Anantatmula,et al.  Greening Project Management Practices for Sustainable Construction , 2011 .

[81]  Aaron J. Shenhar,et al.  From theory to practice: toward a typology of project-management styles , 1998 .

[82]  Katherine L. Milkman,et al.  The team scaling fallacy: Underestimating the declining efficiency of larger teams , 2012 .

[83]  Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al.  How to Make the Team: Social Networks vs. Demography as Criteria for Designing Effective Teams , 2004 .

[84]  R. Katz.  The Effects of Group Longevity on Project Communication and Performance. , 1982 .

[85]  Peter Baloh,et al.  A three-step design science approach to develop a novel human resource-planning framework in projects: the cases of construction projects in USA, Europe, and Iran , 2015 .

[86]  M. Maznevski,et al.  Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness , 2000 .

[87]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Demography and Design: Predictors of New Product Team Performance , 1992 .

[88]  Bradley R. Staats,et al.  Dynamically Integrating Knowledge in Teams: Transforming Resources into Performance , 2011 .

[89]  C. Gibson,et al.  Team Implicit Coordination Processes: A Team Knowledge–Based Approach , 2008 .

[90]  Vernon D. Miller,et al.  Communication Behaviors to Implement Innovations: How Do AEC Teams Communicate in IPD Projects? , 2015 .

[91]  Richard M. Burton,et al.  The Effect of Task Uncertainty and Decentralization on Project Team Performance , 2002, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[92]  Andrew Davies,et al.  Managing Structural and Dynamic Complexity: A Tale of Two Projects , 2014 .

[93]  J. Pinto,et al.  Project team communication and cross-functional cooperation in new program development , 1990 .

[94]  Marte Pettersen Buvik,et al.  Prior ties and trust development in project teams – A case study from the construction industry , 2015 .

[95]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Dynamics of Rework in Complex Offshore Hydrocarbon Projects , 2011 .

[96]  Young Hoon Kwak,et al.  What can we learn from the Hoover Dam project that influenced modern project management , 2014 .

[97]  Li Liu,et al.  Simultaneous Pursuit of Innovation and Efficiency in Complex Engineering Projects—A Study of the Antecedents and Impacts of Ambidexterity in Project Teams , 2012 .

[98]  Jiajia Cheng,et al.  Effect of Knowledge Leadership on Knowledge Sharing in Engineering Project Design Teams: The Role of Social Capital , 2015 .

[99]  E. Sundstrom,et al.  Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. , 1990 .

[100]  Deborah Dougherty,et al.  New products in old organizations : the myth of the better mousetrap in search of the beaten path , 1987 .

[101]  James D. Herbsleb,et al.  Familiarity, Complexity, and Team Performance in Geographically Distributed Software Development , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[102]  Xiaolong Xue,et al.  Critical Review of Collaborative Working in Construction Projects: Business Environment and Human Behaviors , 2010 .

[103]  Mario Bourgault,et al.  Decision Making within Distributed Project Teams: An Exploration of Formalization and Autonomy as Determinants of Success , 2008 .

[104]  Stuart Tennant,et al.  Construction Site Management Team Working: A Serendipitous Event , 2011 .

[105]  Raja R. A. Issa,et al.  BIM Execution Planning in Green Building Projects: LEED as a Use Case , 2015 .

[106]  Edward Ochieng,et al.  Managing Cross-Cultural Communication in Multicultural Construction Project Teams: The Case of Kenya and UK , 2010 .