Framing classroom climate for student learning and retention in computer science

Despite the best laid plans, counterproductive student behavior can interfere with faculty establishment of supportive classroom climates. This paper describes methods for framing the climate of the computer science classroom to minimize outspoken students' unwanted displays of intellectual prowess and engender co-learning behavior among students. Explicit framing of a supportive climate reduces student anxiety about their status among peers, leads them to expect to co-learn concepts, and reduces trepidations about speaking up in class. The framing is grounded by preemptively establishing expectations and addressing concerns through student discussion; asking students to go outside of their interaction style comfort zones for speaking in class; and explicitly describing teaching choices and classroom processes. The framing is reinforced by exposing wrong answers as useful rather than embarrassing, turn-taking techniques for equal student participation, and collaborative learning for assignments and in-class problem solving. Classroom-based retention techniques are important for retaining students who are less experienced with computer science and unsure how to interpret peers? public knowledge claims in relation to their own knowledge or faculty expectations.

[1]  Tanya McGill,et al.  What Students are Telling us about Why They Left Their ICT Course , 2011 .

[2]  A. Astin Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. , 1999 .

[3]  John H. Schuh The Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System , 2002 .

[4]  Nicole Fassbinder,et al.  Steps To An Ecology Of Mind Collected Essays In Anthropology Psychiatry Evolution And Epistemology , 2016 .

[5]  E. Goffman Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience , 1974 .

[6]  Zachary Dodds,et al.  Women in CS: an evaluation of three promising practices , 2010, SIGCSE.

[7]  Sandra Katz,et al.  Gender, achievement, and persistence in an undergraduate computer science program , 2006, DATB.

[8]  Doug Lemov,et al.  Teach like a champion: 49 techniques that put students on the path to college / Doug Lemov , 2010 .

[9]  Norman Jacobson,et al.  Pair programming in CS1: overcoming objections to its adoption , 2008, SGCS.

[10]  Michele H. Jackson,et al.  Defensive climate in the computer science classroom , 2002, SIGCSE '02.

[11]  B. Titsworth,et al.  Immediate and delayed effects of interest cues and engagement cues on students' affective learning , 2001 .

[12]  Robert G. Powell,et al.  Classroom Communication and Diversity: Enhancing Instructional Practice , 2004 .

[13]  P. Shefler The adult learner. , 1971, Washington State journal of nursing.

[14]  A. Astin What matters in college? : four critical years revisited , 1994 .

[15]  Michael W. Matier,et al.  Choosing and leaving science in highly selective institutions , 1994 .

[16]  Laurie A. Williams,et al.  Strengthening the Case for Pair Programming , 2000, IEEE Softw..

[17]  M. Knowles,et al.  The Adult Learner , 2020, The Department Chair.

[18]  Rodney D. Fulton,et al.  A conceptual model for understanding the physical attributes of learning environments , 1991 .

[19]  Robert W. Lent,et al.  Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis. , 2000 .

[20]  D. Sterling Classroom Management: Setting Up the Classroom for Learning. , 2009 .

[21]  Lecia Jane Barker,et al.  Exploring factors that influence computer science introductory course students to persist in the major , 2009, SIGCSE '09.

[22]  Ernest T. Pascarella,et al.  How college affects students : findings and insights from twenty years of research , 1992 .

[23]  Lecia Jane Barker,et al.  Making Visible the Behaviors that Influence Learning Environment: A Qualitative Exploration of Computer Science Classrooms , 2004, Comput. Sci. Educ..

[24]  Phyllis C. Blumenfeld,et al.  Task as a heuristic for understanding student learning and motivation , 1987 .

[25]  R. Schmuck,et al.  Group Processes in the Classroom , 1975 .

[26]  Filip Dochy,et al.  The effects of different learning environments on students' motivation for learning and their achievement. , 2013, The British journal of educational psychology.

[27]  Thomas L. Good,et al.  Looking in Classrooms , 1973 .

[28]  S. Lea,et al.  Higher Education Students' Attitudes to Student-centred Learning: Beyond 'educational bulimia'? , 2003 .

[29]  M. Hanrahan The effect of learning environment factors on students' motivation and learning , 1998 .

[30]  Ramindar S. Dhillon,et al.  In the adult , 1989 .

[31]  Viveca Ostberg Children in classrooms: peer status, status distribution and mental well-being. , 2003, Social science & medicine.

[32]  J. Gibb,et al.  Defensive Communication , 1982, The Journal of nursing administration.

[33]  Charles E. McDowell,et al.  The impact of pair programming on student performance, perception and persistence , 2003, 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, 2003. Proceedings..