Task-Based Information Interaction Evaluation

Evaluation is central in research and development of information retrieval (IR). In addition to designing and implementing new retrieval mechanisms, one must also show through rigorous evaluation that they are effective. A major focus in IR is IR mechanisms’ capability of ranking relevant documents optimally for the users, given a query. Searching for information in practice involves searchers, however, and is highly interactive. When human searchers have been incorporated in evaluation studies, the results have often suggested that better ranking does not necessarily lead to better search task, or work task, performance. Therefore, it is not clear which system or interface features should be developed to improve the effectiveness of human task performance. In the present article, we focus on the evaluation of task-based information interaction (TBII). We give special emphasis to learning tasks to discuss TBII in more concrete terms. Information interaction is here understood as behavioral and cognitive activities related to task planning, searching information items, selecting between them, working with them, and synthesizing and reporting. These five generic activities contribute to task performance and outcome and can be supported by information systems. In an attempt toward task-based evaluation, we introduce program theory as the evaluation framework. Such evaluation can investigate whether a program consisting of TBII activities and tools works and how it works and, further, provides a causal description of program (in)effectiveness. Our goal in the present article is to structure TBII on the basis of the five generic activities and consider the evaluation of each activity using the program theory framework. Finally, we combine these activity-based program theories in an overall evaluation framework for TBII. Such an evaluation is complex due to the large number of factors affecting information interaction. Instead of presenting tested program theories, we illustrate how the evaluation of TBII should be accomplished using the program theory framework in the evaluation of systems and behaviors, and their interactions, comprehensively in context.

[1]  Rachel Segev-Miller,et al.  Writing from Sources: The Effect of Explicit Instruction on College Students' Processes and Products , 2004 .

[2]  Yongyan Li,et al.  Two first-year students’ strategies for writing from sources: Patchwriting or plagiarism? , 2012 .

[3]  Sanna Kumpulainen,et al.  Task-based information access in molecular medicine: task performance, barriers, and searching within a heterogeneous information environment , 2013 .

[4]  Carol Collier Kuhlthau,et al.  Information search process of lawyers: a call for 'just for me' information services , 2001, J. Documentation.

[5]  David Mease,et al.  Measuring improvement in user search performance resulting from optimal search tips , 2011, SIGIR '11.

[6]  Peiling Wang,et al.  A Cognitive Model of Document Use During a Research Project. Study I. Document Selection , 1998, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[7]  Susan R. Goldman,et al.  Reading : from words to multiple texts , 2013 .

[8]  Eero Sormunen,et al.  Students' group work strategies in source‐based writing assignments , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[9]  Theresa Dirndorfer Anderson,et al.  Uncertainty in action: observing information seeking within the creative processes of scholarly research , 2006, Inf. Res..

[10]  Carol Collier Kuhlthau Inside the Search Process: Information Seeking from the User's Perspective. , 1991 .

[11]  Ian Ruthven,et al.  Interactive information retrieval , 2008, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[12]  Patricia J. Rogers,et al.  Program theory evaluation: Practice, promise, and problems , 2000 .

[13]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication (Learning in Doing: Social, , 1987 .

[14]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Distributed expert problem treatment as a model for information system analysis and design , 1982 .

[15]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  A faceted approach to conceptualizing tasks in information seeking , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[16]  Kalervo Järvelin,et al.  Task Complexity Affects Information Seeking and Use , 1995, Inf. Process. Manag..

[17]  M. de Rijke,et al.  A subjunctive exploratory search interface to support media studies researchers , 2012, SIGIR '12.

[18]  Barbara M. Wildemuth,et al.  Medical Students' Personal Knowledge, Searching Proficiency, and Database Use in Problem Solving , 1995, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[19]  Andrew Nurse Designing for Digital Reading, J. Pearson, G. Buchanan, H. Thimbleby, G. Marchiononi (Ed.), in: Part of Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services. Morgan and Claypool, San Rafael, CA (2014) , 2014, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[20]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  A theory of the task-based information retrieval process: a summary and generalisation of a longitudinal study , 2001, J. Documentation.

[21]  Kalervo Järvelin,et al.  Task complexity and information searching in administrative tasks revisited , 2012, IIiX.

[22]  Tetsuya Sakai,et al.  Summaries, ranked retrieval and sessions: a unified framework for information access evaluation , 2013, SIGIR.

[23]  Jaana Kekäläinen,et al.  Contextualization models for XML retrieval , 2011, Inf. Process. Manag..

[24]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  Where should the person stop and the information search interface start? , 1990, Inf. Process. Manag..

[25]  Falk Scholer,et al.  User performance versus precision measures for simple search tasks , 2006, SIGIR.

[26]  M. Scriven Evaluation thesaurus, 4th ed. , 1991 .

[27]  Gregory Schraw Promoting general metacognitive awareness , 1998 .

[28]  John Biggs,et al.  The Role of Metacognition in Enhancing Learning , 1988 .

[29]  Robert Z. Zheng,et al.  Do graphical search interfaces support effective search for and evaluation of digital library resources , 2011, JCDL '11.

[30]  Jannica Heinström,et al.  Fast surfing, broad scanning and deep diving: The influence of personality and study approach on students' information-seeking behavior , 2005, J. Documentation.

[31]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Evaluating computer-supported cooperative work: models and frameworks , 2004, CSCW.

[32]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Task complexity, problem structure and information actions - Integrating studies on information seeking and retrieval , 1999, Inf. Process. Manag..

[33]  Eero Sormunen,et al.  Video needs at the different stages of television program making process , 2006, IIiX.

[34]  J. Flavell Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive-Developmental Inquiry. , 1979 .

[35]  Miika Marttunen,et al.  Working on Understanding During Collaborative Online Reading , 2012 .

[36]  Eero Sormunen,et al.  Authoring Wikipedia articles as an information literacy assignment: copy-pasting or expressing new understanding in one's own words? , 2011, Inf. Res..

[37]  Abraham Bookstein,et al.  Information retrieval: A sequential learning process , 1983, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[38]  Chih-Ming Chen,et al.  Assessing effects of information architecture of digital libraries on supporting E-learning: A case study on the Digital Library of Nature & Culture , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[39]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Changes in relevance criteria and problem stages in task performance , 2000, J. Documentation.

[40]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  What is browsing - really? A model drawing from behavioural science research , 2007, Inf. Res..

[41]  Richard E. West,et al.  Mendeley: Creating Communities of Scholarly Inquiry Through Research Collaboration , 2011 .

[42]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Changes in Search Tactics and Relevance Judgements when Preparing a Research Proposal A Summary of the Findings of a Longitudinal Study , 2001, Information Retrieval.

[43]  Jean Tague-Sutcliffe,et al.  Some measures and procedures for evaluation of the user interface in an information retrieval system , 1988, SIGIR '88.

[44]  Tobias Zimmermann,et al.  Information architecture , 2004, Electron. Libr..

[45]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. , 1957 .

[46]  Eta S. Berner Clinical Decision Support Systems: Theory and Practice (Health Informatics) , 2006 .

[47]  N. Belkin,et al.  A classification of interactions with information , 2002 .

[48]  Mar Mateos,et al.  Synthesising information from various texts: A study of procedures and products at different educational levels , 2009 .

[49]  Catherine C. Marshall,et al.  Reading and Writing the Electronic Book , 2009, Reading and Writing the Electronic Book.

[50]  D. Krathwohl A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview , 2002 .

[51]  William R. Hersh,et al.  A task-oriented approach to information retrieval evaluation , 1996 .

[52]  Kalervo Järvelin,et al.  Information interaction in molecular medicine: integrated use of multiple channels , 2010, IIiX.

[53]  Elena Maceviciute Review of: Thelwall, Michael. Introduction to webometrics: quantitative web research for the social sciences. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool, 2009 , 2010, Inf. Res..

[54]  Mark Sanderson,et al.  Test Collection Based Evaluation of Information Retrieval Systems , 2010, Found. Trends Inf. Retr..

[55]  Duen-Ren Liu,et al.  Toward incorporating a task-stage identification technique into the long-term document support process , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[56]  Jean-François Rouet,et al.  The Skills of Document Use: From Text Comprehension to Web-Based Learning , 2006 .

[57]  Jaana Kekäläinen,et al.  Browsing patterns in retrieved documents , 2014, IIiX.

[58]  Carol L. Barry,et al.  Users' Criteria for Relevance Evaluation: A Cross-situational Comparison , 1998, Inf. Process. Manag..

[59]  Eero Sormunen,et al.  A critical review of research on information behavior in assigned learning tasks , 2008, J. Documentation.

[60]  Barbara M. Wildemuth,et al.  The effects of domain knowledge on search tactic formulation , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[61]  Ian Ruthven,et al.  Grieving online: the use of search engines in times of grief and bereavement , 2012, IIiX.

[62]  Jannica Heinström,et al.  Fast surfing for availability or deep diving into quality - motivation and information seeking among middle and high school students , 2006, Inf. Res..

[63]  Marshall G. Jones,et al.  Using Metacognitive Theories to Design User Interfaces for Computer-Based Learning. , 1995 .

[64]  George W. Furnas,et al.  Model-driven formative evaluation of exploratory search: A study under a sensemaking framework , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[65]  Christina Wodtke,et al.  Information Architecture , 2002 .

[66]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface , 1989 .

[67]  Dan R. Olsen,et al.  Interacting with Information , 1995, DSV-IS.

[68]  Kalervo Järvelin,et al.  Assessing learning outcomes in two information retrieval learning environments , 2005, Inf. Process. Manag..

[69]  Leanne Bowler,et al.  A taxonomy of adolescent metacognitive knowledge during the information search process , 2010 .

[70]  Chris L. S. Coryn,et al.  A Systematic Review of Theory-Driven Evaluation Practice From 1990 to 2009 , 2011 .

[71]  K. Järvelin,et al.  EVALUATING INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS UNDER THE CHALLENGES OF INTERACTION AND MULTIDIMENSIONAL DYNAMIC RELEVANCE , 2002 .

[72]  J. Hayes,et al.  A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing , 1981, College Composition & Communication.

[73]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Relevance and contributing information types of searched documents in task performance , 2000, SIGIR '00.

[74]  Jennifer Pearson,et al.  Designing for Digital Reading , 2013, Designing for Digital Reading.

[75]  Don R. Swanson,et al.  Information Retrieval as a Trial-And-Error Process , 1977, The Library Quarterly.

[76]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  Dimensions of relevance , 2000, Inf. Process. Manag..

[77]  Rebecca Moore Howard,et al.  Writing from Sources, Writing from Sentences , 2010 .

[78]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  On the evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems , 2010 .

[79]  Susan R. Goldman,et al.  Research and Development of Multiple Source Comprehension Assessment , 2012 .

[80]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Changes of search terms and tactics while writing a research proposal: A longitudinal case study , 2003, Inf. Process. Manag..

[81]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Task-based information searching , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[82]  Tefko Saracevic,et al.  RELEVANCE: A review of and a framework for the thinking on the notion in information science , 1997, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[83]  Fabrizio Silvestri,et al.  Identifying task-based sessions in search engine query logs , 2011, WSDM '11.

[84]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  The Turn - Integration of Information Seeking and Retrieval in Context , 2005, The Kluwer International Series on Information Retrieval.

[85]  John Dowell,et al.  Information seeking and use by newspaper journalists , 2003, J. Documentation.

[86]  Sanna Kumpulainen,et al.  Trails across the heterogeneous information environment: Manual integration patterns of search systems in molecular medicine , 2014, J. Documentation.

[87]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  An exploration of the relationships between work task and interactive information search behavior , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[88]  Christine L. Borgman,et al.  The user's mental model of an information retrieval system , 1999, SIGIR '85.

[89]  Pia Borlund,et al.  Experimental components for the evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems , 2000, J. Documentation.

[90]  Preben Hansen,et al.  Conceptual framework for tasks in information studies: Book Reviews , 2005 .

[91]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Exploratory search , 2006, Commun. ACM.

[92]  William R. Hersh,et al.  Relevance and Retrieval Evaluation: Perspectives from Medicine , 1994, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[93]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Exploratory Searching As Conceptual Exploration , 2010 .

[94]  Susan De La Paz,et al.  Using Writing Tasks to Elicit Adolescents’ Historical Reasoning , 2012 .

[95]  P. Checkland,et al.  Action Research: Its Nature and Validity , 1998 .

[96]  Kalervo Järvelin,et al.  Barriers to task-based information access in molecular medicine , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[97]  C. Achilles,et al.  Evaluation: A Systematic Approach , 1980 .

[98]  D. Bates,et al.  Clinical Decision Support Systems , 1999, Health Informatics.

[99]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Searching vs. writing: Factors affecting information use task performance , 2012, ASIST.

[100]  Luanne Freund,et al.  Supporting semantic navigation , 2010, IIiX.

[101]  Chirag Shah,et al.  Collaborative Information Seeking: The Art and Science of Making the Whole Greater than the Sum of All , 2012 .

[102]  Kalervo Järvelin,et al.  Explaining User Performance in Information Retrieval: Challenges to IR Evaluation , 2009, ICTIR.

[103]  Nancy Nelson Spivey,et al.  The Constructivist Metaphor: Reading, Writing, and the Making of Meaning , 1996 .

[104]  Pia Borlund,et al.  The concept of relevance in IR , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[105]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  A diary study of work-related reading: design implications for digital reading devices , 1998, CHI.

[106]  Preben Hansen,et al.  Conceptual framework for tasks in information studies , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[107]  Catherine L. Smith,et al.  User adaptation: good results from poor systems , 2008, SIGIR '08.

[108]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Search effort degrades search output but improves task outcome , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[109]  Charles L. A. Clarke,et al.  Modeling task-genre relationships for IR in the workplace , 2005, SIGIR '05.

[110]  Preben Hansen,et al.  Task-based Information Seeking and Retrieval in the Patent Domain: Processes and Relationships , 2011 .

[111]  Tefko Saracevic,et al.  Modeling Interaction in Information Retrieval (IR): A Review and Proposal. , 1996 .

[112]  Ross J. Todd From information to knowledge: charting and measuring changes in students' knowledge of a curriculum topic , 2006, Inf. Res..

[113]  Aldo de Moor,et al.  Argumentation support , 2006 .

[114]  Eero Sormunen,et al.  A method for the analysis of information use in source-based writing , 2012, Inf. Res..

[115]  Jaana Kekäläinen,et al.  Expected reading effort in focused retrieval evaluation , 2010, Information Retrieval.

[116]  M. Carr,et al.  Strategy Acquisition and Transfer Among American and German Children: Environmental Influences on Metacognitive Development , 1989 .

[117]  Bradford Lee Eden Interactive Information Retrieval in Digital Environments , 2009 .

[118]  Douglas W. Oard,et al.  Modeling Information Content Using Observable Behavior , 2001 .

[119]  Bernard J. Jansen,et al.  Almighty Twitter, what are people asking for? , 2012, ASIST.

[120]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Client information system as an everyday information tool in child protection work , 2010, IIiX.

[121]  Carol Collier Kuhlthau,et al.  The Role of Experience in the Information Search Process of an Early Career Information Worker: Perceptions of Uncertainty, Complexity Construction, and Sources , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..