An Evaluation of Depth and Size Perception on a Spherical Fish Tank Virtual Reality Display

Fish Tank Virtual Reality (FTVR) displays create a compelling 3D spatial effect by rendering to the perspective of the viewer with head-tracking. Combining FTVR with a spherical display enhances the 3D experience with unique properties of the spherical screen such as the enclosing shape, consistent curved surface, and borderless views from all angles around the display. The ability to generate a strong 3D effect on a spherical display with head-tracked rendering is promising for increasing user's performance in 3D tasks. An unanswered question is whether these natural affordances of spherical FTVR displays can improve spatial perception in comparison to traditional flat FTVR displays. To investigate this question, we conducted an experiment to see whether users can perceive the depth and size of virtual objects better on a spherical FTVR display compared to a flat FTVR display on two tasks. Using the spherical display, we found significantly that users had 1cm depth accuracy compared to 6.5cm accuracy using the flat display on a depth-ranking task. Likewise, their performance on a size-matching task was also significantly better with the size error of 2.3mm on the spherical display compared to 3.1mm on the flat display. Furthermore, the perception of size-constancy is stronger on the spherical display than the flat display. This study indicates that the natural affordances provided by the spherical form factor improve depth and size perception in 3D compared to a flat display. We believe that spherical FTVR displays have potential as a 3D virtual environment to provide better task performance for various 3D applications such as 3D designs, scientific visualizations, and virtual surgery.

[1]  Jonathan W. Kelly,et al.  More than just perception–action recalibration: Walking through a virtual environment causes rescaling of perceived space , 2013, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[2]  Christopher G. Healey,et al.  A comparison of immersive HMD, fish tank VR and fish tank with haptics displays for volume visualization , 2006, APGV '06.

[3]  Florian Vogt,et al.  Cubee: a cubic 3D display for physics-based interaction , 2006, SIGGRAPH '06.

[4]  Ian Stavness,et al.  Interactive Visual Calibration of Volumetric Head-Tracked 3D Displays , 2017, CHI.

[5]  Hrvoje Benko,et al.  Dyadic projected spatial augmented reality , 2014, UIST.

[6]  Eric Kolstad,et al.  The Effects of Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, and Motion Parallax on Egocentric Depth Perception , 2008, 2008 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference.

[7]  Ravin Balakrishnan,et al.  Sphere: multi-touch interactions on a spherical display , 2008, UIST '08.

[8]  Yichen Tang,et al.  A 3D cubic puzzle in pCubee , 2011, 3DUI.

[9]  Colin Ware,et al.  Information Visualization: Perception for Design , 2000 .

[10]  Helen Wright,et al.  Phenomenal regression to the real object in physical and virtual worlds , 2015, Virtual Reality.

[11]  Andrew Wilson,et al.  MirageTable: freehand interaction on a projected augmented reality tabletop , 2012, CHI.

[12]  Qian Zhou,et al.  Coglobe: a co-located multi-person FTVR experience , 2018, SIGGRAPH Emerging Technologies.

[13]  Roel Vertegaal,et al.  A comparison of competitive and cooperative task performance using spherical and flat displays , 2012, CSCW '12.

[14]  Sidney S. Fels,et al.  pCubee: a perspective-corrected handheld cubic display , 2010, CHI.

[15]  W. Brent Seales,et al.  Multi-projector displays using camera-based registration , 1999, Proceedings Visualization '99 (Cat. No.99CB37067).

[16]  Marcelo Knörich Zuffo,et al.  Spheree: An interactive perspective-corrected spherical 3D display , 2014, 2014 3DTV-Conference: The True Vision - Capture, Transmission and Display of 3D Video (3DTV-CON).

[17]  Roel Vertegaal,et al.  TeleHuman: effects of 3d perspective on gaze and pose estimation with a life-size cylindrical telepresence pod , 2012, CHI.

[18]  Sarah H Creem-Regehr,et al.  Evaluating the accuracy of size perception on screen-based displays: Displayed objects appear smaller than real objects. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[19]  Gregg E. Favalora.  Volumetric 3D displays and application infrastructure , 2005, Computer.

[20]  Roel Vertegaal,et al.  SnowGlobe: a spherical fish-tank VR display , 2011, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[21]  Thomas A. DeFanti,et al.  The Effects of Scene Complexity, Stereovision, and Motion Parallax on Size Constancy in a Virtual Environment , 2007, 2007 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference.

[22]  Mark Wagner,et al.  Sensory and Cognitive Explanations for a Century of Size Constancy Research , 2012 .

[23]  Tovi Grossman,et al.  An evaluation of depth perception on volumetric displays , 2006, AVI '06.

[24]  J. Andrade,et al.  Statistical comparison of the slopes of two regression lines: A tutorial. , 2014, Analytica chimica acta.

[25]  Boris M. Velichkovsky,et al.  The perception of egocentric distances in virtual environments - A review , 2013, ACM Comput. Surv..

[26]  Jonathan W. Kelly,et al.  Judgments of exocentric direction in large-scale space. , 2010, Perception.

[27]  Sidney S. Fels,et al.  Automatic Calibration of a Multiple-Projector Spherical Fish Tank VR Display , 2017, 2017 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV).

[28]  Jonathan W. Kelly,et al.  Rescaling of Perceived Space Transfers Across Virtual Environments , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  Gerd Bruder,et al.  CAVE Size Matters: Effects of Screen Distance and Parallax on Distance Estimation in Large Immersive Display Setups , 2016, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[30]  Sidney S. Fels,et al.  3DPS: An auto-calibrated three-dimensional perspective-corrected spherical display , 2017, 2017 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR).

[31]  Will Spijkers,et al.  Depth Perception in Virtual Reality: Distance Estimations in Peri- and Extrapersonal Space , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[32]  Sidney S. Fels,et al.  Calibration Methods for Effective Fish Tank VR in Multi-screen Displays , 2017, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[33]  Robert G. Eggleston,et al.  Virtual reality system effects on size-distance judgements in a virtual environment , 1996, Proceedings of the IEEE 1996 Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium.

[34]  Hyun Joon Shin,et al.  Perceptual Calibration for Immersive Display Environments , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[35]  Thomas A. DeFanti,et al.  Size-Constancy in the CAVE , 2007, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[36]  Sarah H. Creem-Regehr,et al.  Effect of viewing plane on perceived distances in real and virtual environments. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  Wang Hui-nan.  Multi-Finger Gestural Interaction with 3D Volumetric Displays , 2008 .

[38]  Jonathan W. Kelly,et al.  Perceived Space in the HTC Vive , 2017, ACM Trans. Appl. Percept..

[39]  Betty J. Mohler,et al.  The influence of feedback on egocentric distance judgments in real and virtual environments , 2006, APGV '06.

[40]  François Bérard,et al.  The Object Inside: Assessing 3D Examination with a Spherical Handheld Perspective-Corrected Display , 2017, CHI.

[41]  Anthony Steed,et al.  Preserving gaze direction in teleconferencing using a camera array and a spherical display , 2012, 2012 3DTV-Conference: The True Vision - Capture, Transmission and Display of 3D Video (3DTV-CON).

[42]  Kellogg S. Booth,et al.  Evaluating 3D task performance for fish tank virtual worlds , 1993, TOIS.

[43]  Sarah H. Creem-Regehr,et al.  Perceiving absolute scale in virtual environments: How theory and application have mutually informed the role of body-based perception , 2015 .

[44]  Colin Ware,et al.  Evaluating stereo and motion cues for visualizing information nets in three dimensions , 1996, TOGS.