Role of Conflict 1 The Liberating Role of Conflict in Group Creativity : A Cross Cultural Study

Researchers of group creativity have noted problems such as social loafing, “production blocking,” and especially, evaluation apprehension (Paulus, 2000). Thus, brainstorming techniques have specifically admonished people “not to criticize” their own and others’ ideas, a tenet that has gone unexamined. In contrast, there is research showing that dissen , debate and competing views have positive value, stimulating divergent and creative thought (Nemeth, 2002, in press). In this experimental study, traditional brainstorming instructions admonishing people not to criticize were compared with instruc tions encouraging people to debate and even criticize. A third condition offered no specific instructions. This study was conducted both in the United States and in France. Results show the value of both types of instructions, but, in general, debate instructions were superior to traditional brainstorming instructions. Further, these findings hold across both cultures. Results are discussed in terms of the positive value of encouraging debate and controversy for idea generation.

[1]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Minority dissent and team innovation: the importance of participation in decision making. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[2]  John D. Rogers,et al.  Devil's advocate versus authentic dissent: stimulating quantity and quality , 2001 .

[3]  T. Postmes,et al.  Quality of decision making and group norms. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  E. Mannix,et al.  The Dynamic Nature of Conflict: A Longitudinal Study of Intragroup Conflict and Group Performance. , 2001 .

[5]  Robin Martin,et al.  Minority influence and argument generation , 1996 .

[6]  R. Saavedra,et al.  A naturalistic minority influence experiment: Effects on divergent thinking, conflict and originality in work‐groups , 1996 .

[7]  Joseph Kasof,et al.  Explaining Creativity: The Attributional Perspective , 1995 .

[8]  C. Nemeth,et al.  Dissent as driving cognition, attitudes, and judgments. , 1995 .

[9]  C. Dreu,et al.  Numerical support, information processing and attitude change , 1993 .

[10]  M. Diehl,et al.  Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. , 1987 .

[11]  C. Nemeth,et al.  Minority Influence, Divergent Thinking and Detection of Correct Solutions , 1987 .

[12]  C. Nemeth,et al.  Originality of word associations as a function of majority vs. minority influence. , 1985 .

[13]  G. Stasser,et al.  Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion , 1985 .

[14]  T. M. Amabile.  The social psychology of creativity , 1984 .

[15]  S. J. W. Fulbright.  Foreign policy ‐ myth and reality: Speech in the United States Senate 25 March 1964 , 1964 .

[16]  John P. Campbell,et al.  The effect of group participation on brainstorming effectiveness for 2 industrial samples. , 1963 .

[17]  Donald W. Taylor,et al.  DOES GROUP PARTICIPATION WHEN USING BRAINSTORMING FACILITATE OR INHIBIT CREATIVE THINKING , 1958 .

[18]  Charlan Nemeth,et al.  Understanding the Creative Process: Management of the Knowledge Worker , 2001 .

[19]  D. Simonton.  Creativity. Cognitive, personal, developmental, and social aspects. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[20]  Fieke Harinck,et al.  Conflict and performance in groups and organizations , 1999 .

[21]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  Culture as social control: Corporations, cults, and commitment. , 1996 .

[22]  P. Paulus,et al.  The Role of Social Anxiousness in Group Brainstorming , 1995 .

[23]  Serge Moscovici,et al.  Toward A Theory of Conversion Behavior , 1980 .